Case File Materials re Kenneth W. Starr
3 November 1992


                    | Request for Hearing on Case Re
                    | Solicitor General Kenneth W. Starr
                    | Pursuant to 29 CFR 1614.108(f)
TO D. Diane Weaver        FROM Leroy J. Pletten       3 Nov 1992
   Ofc of Eql Opp                       

1. Your predecessor, Kenneth Adler, refused me view of this case. I believe he was pressured by high officials.

2. I have complained of the refusal of review. Recently, A. William Schukar, District Director of EEOC, told me that a new rule adds to the emphasis against an agency refusing or stalling review. That new rule is 29 CFR 1614.108(f) (hearing once six months is up).

3. Pursuant to that rule, this requests a hearing. I request that all parties, including but not limited to Mr. Starr, be made available at the hearing as witnesses to what they have done.

                                        Sincerely yours,
                                        /s/Leroy J. Pletten
                                        Leroy J. Pletten

DA FORM 2496

Other Materials in Case File

Appellant's 19 Nov 1976 Appointment
as Crime Prevention Officer

The 7 Jan 1992 Attempt
To Get Review to Begin

The 28 May 1993 Attempt To Get Review to Begin
Citing Violation of Due Process: NO NOTICE OF CHARGES

The 17 Apr 1996 Attempt To Get Review to Begin After
Being Obstructed 1991-1996: Citing Legal Principles With
Respect To Some of The Crimes Being Aided and Abetted

The 19 Apr 1996 List Of Rules of Professional Practice
for Attorneys Being Violated And Attempting To Get
Review To Begin After Being Obstructed 1991-1996

The 6 March 1998 Correspondence
Citing Starr's Apparent Coverup
of Falsehood In Another Case and
My Attempting to Get Review
To Begin After Being Obstructed 1991-1998

The 25 August 1998 Correspondence Citing a
Published Analysis of Starr's Apparent Sexual Fantasies
and Again Attempting to Get Review to Begin After
Being Obstructed 1991-1998, Correspondence
That Combined With This Material Inspired the Agency
to Suddenly Fight Harder to Prevent Review
as It Clearly Must Be Striking Close to The Truth

The 15 Sep 1998 Petition for An EEOC Order Directing
Review Pursuant to the 1991 Agency Settlement To Do So

The 9 Dec 1998 Motion To Strike the
Untimely Agency Response Attempting to
Continue to Obstruct Review

The 20 April 1999 Brief On Merits Pursuant
To Agency Refusal to Allow Review on Merits

The Website Promoting Justice For This Situation

A Private Citizen's Analysis of Kenneth W. Starr

         While decision is pending on whether to even allow review on the merits to begin, the petitioner will continue to post additional materials from the case file, including issues on the merits, as able.

         Your assistance is requested. Please write to the President asking him to order a genuine investigation, and when he verifies that no notice of charges was issued me (unlike what is provided to others accused of genuine wrongdoing), to reinstate me.


Email@Crime Victim