Case File Materials re Kenneth W. Starr
14 October 1999

Office of Federal Operations
P. O. Box 19848
Washington, D.C. 20036

Leroy J. Pletten,
          v.                                                                                  Docket No. 01990657

Kenneth W. Starr, et al.,                                      



Petitioner Leroy J. Pletten hereby notifies EEOC of the discovery of new evidence, a 22 Sep 1999 lawsuit by the Department of Justice against Starr's tobacco company client Brown & Williamson, and accomplices, pursuant to the Anti-Racketeering Act, 18 USC § 1961 et seq. The filing of the lawsuit is a matter of public domain knowledge, having appeared in the media, and posted worldwide at, with an appendix,, and an accompanying press release,

Starr was involved in aiding and abetting activities against another whistleblower, Jeffrey Wigand, in another Brown & Williamson lawsuit, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co v Rep. Henry A. Waxman, et al., DC Circuit Court No. 94-5171 (1995), copy on the Internet at Now his client has been identified by the U.S. government as long having engaged in a pattern of racketeering.

The newly discovered data corroborates my position, to be developed once merits review (investigation and hearing such as others normally receive) begins, of Starr's unethical activity (adversely impacting me in a discriminatory manner, using his then official position for private gain, thereby treating me differently than others similarly situated) including aiding and abetting a long-term pattern of racketeering, including in my case, violations of state and federal law, forgery, bribery, obstruction of justice, deaths, and other egregious crimes and misconduct, as alleged in the record.

                                                          Leroy J. Pletten;
14 Oct 1999                                       Leroy J. Pletten
                                                           Personnel Office Crime Prevention Officer/Petitioner
                                                            8401 18 Mile Road #29
                                                            Sterling Heights MI 48313-3042
                                                            (810) 739-8343

Copy to:
Louis Caldera, Secretary
And Anti-Discrimination Office
Department of the Army
The Pentagon
Washington DC 20310-1500

Other Materials in Case File

Appellant's 19 Nov 1976 Appointment
as Crime Prevention Officer

The 7 Jan 1992 Attempt
To Get Review to Begin
The 3 Nov 1992 Attempt
To Get Review to Begin

The 28 May 1993 Attempt To Get Review to Begin
Citing Violation of Due Process: NO NOTICE OF CHARGES

The 17 Apr 1996 Attempt To Get Review to Begin After
Being Obstructed 1991-1996: Citing Legal Principles With
Respect To Some of The Crimes Being Aided and Abetted

The 19 Apr 1996 List Of Rules of Professional Practice
for Attorneys Being Violated And Attempting To Get
Review To Begin After Being Obstructed 1991-1996

The 6 March 1998 Correspondence
Citing Starr's Apparent Coverup
of Falsehood In Another Case and
My Attempting to Get Review
To Begin After Being Obstructed 1991-1998

The 25 August 1998 Correspondence Citing a
Published Analysis of Starr's Apparent Sexual Fantasies
and Again Attempting to Get Review to Begin After
Being Obstructed 1991-1998, Correspondence
That Combined With This Material Inspired the Agency
to Sudddenly Fight Harder to Prevent Review
as It Clearly Must Be Striking Close to The Truth

The 15 Sep 1998 Petition for An EEOC Order Directing
Review Pursuant to the 1991 Agency Settlement To Do So

The 20 April 1999 Brief On Merits Pursuant
To Agency Refusal to Allow Review on Merits

The Website Promoting Justice For This Situation

A Private Citizen's Analysis of Kenneth W. Starr

         While decision is pending on whether to even allow review on the merits to begin, the petitioner will continue to post additional materials from the case file, including issues on the merits, as able.

         Your assistance is requested. Please write to the President asking him to order a genuine investigation, and when he verifies that no notice of charges was issued me (unlike what is provided to others accused of genuine wrongdoing), to reinstate me.


Email@Crime Victim