Brief to OSC, 30 March 1982, in Continued Effort to Secure Notification of Specificity and of Rights to Review of the TACOM Decision to Terminate, Retaliating Against Pletten's Whistleblowing.
See also other Briefs in the series, e.g., 21 March 1983, 27 July 1983, 25 Nov 1983, and 2 Jan 1985, as per Pletten's working full-time+ developing every evidence for seeking his reinstatement, and recording his position, for anticipated use in the EEOC forum, which TACOM was obstructing. The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) forum is notoriously both hostile and under perverted leadership. See, e.g., Julia Davis, "Office of Special Counsel (OSC) - The Dark Legacy" (The Examiner, 23 July 2010). So appeal to it was to no avail. More briefs in the series of efforts to obtain review on merits to begin will be posted as scanned. The volume is enormous, takes some time. |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Office of Special Counsel
Page 7 of ___8__ pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |
Page 8 of __8_____ pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |
Page 10 of 67? pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |
Page 11 of 67 pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |
“1. A false representation made by the defendant. In the ordinary case, this representation must be one of fact. 2. Knowledge or belief on the part of the defendant that the representation is false—or, what is regarded as equivalent, that he has not a sufficient basis of information to make it. This element often is given the technical name of ‘scienter.’” |
The elements of fraudulent misrepresentation go on to provide more data. In Cormack v. Am. Underwriters Corp, 94 Mich. App. 379, 288 N.W.2d 634, the Prosser “definition is supported by Michigan case law. See, Graham v. Myers, 333 Mich. 111, 52 N.W.2d 621 (1952), Michael v. Jones, 333 Mich. 476, 53 N.W.2d 342 (1952) . . . Rose v. Wertheimer, 11 Mich.App. 401, 161 N.W.2d 406 (1968).”
Page 39 of 67 pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |
Page 50 of ___67____ pages. | Affiant's initials _________ |