1830 - 2008
Citing "Cigarettes," "Smoking, or "Tobacco"
|
1. Parsons v Armor, 28 US 413; 7 L Ed 724 (ED La, Jan 1830) (t) (bad debt case) 2. Dred Scott v Sandford, 60 US 393; 15 L Ed 691 (1857) (tobacco farmer activity) 3. The Cherokee Tobacco, 78 US 616; 20 L Ed 227 (WD Ark, Dec 1870) (t) (tax exemption case) 4. United States v Henderson's Tobacco, 78 US 652; 20 L Ed 235 (Dec 1870) (tax case) 5. Pace v Burgess, 92 US 372; 23 L Ed 657 (ED Va, Oct 1875) (s, t) (tax case precedent still valid) 6. Lilienthal's Tobacco v United States, 97 US 237; 24 L Ed 901 (21 Jan 1878) 7. Burgess v Salmon, 97 US 381; 24 L Ed 1104 (ED Va, Oct 1878) (t) (tax case) 8. Turner v State of Maryland, 107 US 38; 2 S Ct 44; 27 L Ed 370 (Md, 5 Feb 1883) (t) (business practices case, affirming constitutionality of state tobacco inspection law; conviction in state court upheld) 9. Snyder v Marks, 109 US 189; 3 S Ct 157; 27 L Ed 901 (La, 2 Nov 1883) (t) (tax case) 10. Snyder v U.S., 112 US 216; 5 S Ct 118; 28 L Ed 697 (La, 17 Nov 1884) (tax case) 11. Turpin v Burgess, 117 US 504; 6 S Ct 835; 29 L Ed 988 (Va, 5 April 1886) (s, t) (tax case, alleging tax on tobacco manufacture was on exports, banned by the constitution) 12. Field v Clark, 143 US 649; 12 S Ct 495; 36 L Ed 294 (29 Feb 1892) (s) (tax case, constitutional challenge, alleging it didn't pass as text was not in congressional journal) 13. Isaacs v Jonas, 148 US 648; 13 S Ct 677; 37 L Ed 596 (La, 10 April 1893) (c, s, t) (tax case) 14. U.S. v Isaacs, 148 US 654; 13 S Ct 679; 37 L Ed 598 (La, 10 April 1893) (c, t) (tax case) 15. U S v Snyder, 149 US 210; 13 S Ct 846; 37 L Ed 705 (La, 1 May 1893) (t) (tax case) 16. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v Lowell, 151 US 209; 14 S Ct 281; 38 L Ed 131 (8 Jan 1894) (s) (a passenger rights case; smoker injury case, injured while ignoring a warning sign posted by railroad) 17. Seeberger v Castro, 153 US 32; 14 S Ct 766; 38 L Ed 624 (Ill, 16 April 1894) (s, t) (tax case). SCB: 40 F 531 18. Spalding v Castro, 153 US 38; 14 S Ct 768; 38 L Ed 626 (16 April 1894) (t) (tax case) 19. Erhardt v Schroeder, 155 US 124; 15 S Ct 325; 39 L Ed 94 (NY, 12 Nov 1894) (t) (tax case) 20. Dunbar v U.S., 156 US 185; 15 S Ct 325; 39 L Ed 390 (Oregon, 28 Jan 1895) (s) (opium smuggling case, of concern as later North Dakota's Supreme Court cited fear of opium being mixed into tobacco) 21. U.S. v American Tobacco Co, 166 US 468; 17 S Ct 619; 41 L Ed 1081 (12 April 1897) (t) (tax stamps refund case) 22. Richmond & A. R. Co v R. A. Patterson Tobacco Co, 169 US 311; 18 S Ct 335; 42 L Ed 759 (21 Feb 1898) (t) (business practices case; issue of responsibility for tobacco lost in shipment). SCB: 92 Va 670; 24 SE 261 23. U.S. v Lies, 170 US 628; 18 S Ct 780; 42 L Ed 1170 (NY, 23 May 1898) (t) (tax case). SCB: 38 US App 655; 20 CCA 651; 74 F 546 24. Keck v U S, 172 US 434; 19 S Ct 254; 43 L Ed 505 (ED Pa, 9 Jan 1899) (s) (diamond smuggling, quash indictment for lack of specificity) 25. Gundling v Chicago, 177 US 183; 20 S Ct 633; 44 L Ed 725 (9 April 1900). SCB: 176 Ill 340; 52 NE 44 (See "Medicolegal: Power to Regulate Sale of Cigarettes," 35 J Am Med Ass'n 298-299 [4 Aug 1900]) 26. John Bad Elk v U.S., 177 US 529; 20 S Ct 729; 44 L Ed 874 (SD, 30 April 1900) (s) 27. Austin v State of Tennessee, 179 US 343; 21 S Ct 132; 45 L Ed 224 (Tenn, 19 Nov 1900). SCB: 101 Tenn 563; 48 SW 305; 70 Am St Rep 703 (c) (issue of whether commerce clause preempts state cigarette ban based on tobacco hazardessness and addictiveness; it does not) 28. Chesapeake & O R Co v Com. of Kentucky, 179 US 388; 21 S Ct 101; 45 L Ed 244 (3 Dec 1900) (s) (post-slavery segregation era railroad passengers case; Kentucky law ordered railroad to provide segregated cars; blacks were forced into the "smoking car . . . alleged to be small, badly ventilated, unclean, and fitted with greatly inferior accommodations") 29. Rothschild & Bro v U.S., 179 US 463; 21 S Ct 197; 45 L Ed 277 (NY, 17 Dec 1900) (t) (tax case). SCB: 87 F 798 30. Barker v Harvey, 181 US 481; 21 S Ct 690; 45 L Ed 963 (13 May 1901) (s) (citing The Cherokee Tobacco case, supra, as still valid precedent) 31. De Lima v Bidwell, 182 US 1; 21 S Ct 743; 45 L Ed 1041 (NY, 27 May 1901) (s) 32. Downes v Bidwell, 182 US 244; 21 S Ct 770; 45 L Ed 1088 (NY, 27 May 1901) (s) 33. Louisville & N R Co v Eubank, 184 US 27; 22 S Ct 277; 46 L Ed 416 (27 Jan 1902) (t) (shipping charges case) 34. Patton v Brady, 184 US 608; 22 S Ct 493; 46 L Ed 713 (ED Va, 17 March 1902) (s, t) (tax case) 35. U.S. v Lee Yen Tai, 185 US 213; 22 S Ct 629; 46 L Ed 878 (21 April 1902) (s) again affirming validity of The Cherokee Tobacco decision, supra) 36. Felsenheld / Merry World Tobacco v U S, 186 US 126; 22 S Ct 740; 46 L Ed 1085 (19 May 1902) (s, t) (confiscated tobacco, banned for containing anything other than tobacco therein) 37. Lone Wolf v Hitchcock, 187 US 553; 23 S Ct 216; 47 L Ed 299 (5 Jan 1903) (s) (necessity confers power) 38. Cornell v Coyne, 192 US 418; 24 S Ct 383; 48 L Ed 504 (23 Feb 1904) (t) (tax case, citing tobacco precedents and issues back to the Civil War) 39. Northern Pac Ry Co v Adams, 192 US 440; 24 S Ct 408; 48 L Ed 513 (Wash, 23 Feb 1904) (s) (smoker killed by fall from train). SCB: 54 CCA 196; 116 F 324 40. Cook v Marshall County, 196 US 261; 25 S Ct 233; 49 L Ed 471 (Iowa, 16 Jan 1905). SCB: 119 Iowa 384; 93 NW 372; 104 Am St Rep 283 (s, t) (tax case) 41. Hodge v Muscatine County, 196 US 276; 25 S Ct 237; 49 L Ed 477 (Iowa, 16 Jan 1905). SCB: 121 Iowa 482; 96 NW 968; 104 Am St Rep 383 (c) (tax case) 42. Hale v Henkel, 201 US 43; 26 S Ct 370; 50 L Ed 652 (SD NY, 12 March 1906) (t) (anti-trust case subpoena during investigation) 43. McAlister, Dir, Am Tobacco Co v Henkel, 201 US 90; 26 S Ct 385; 50 L Ed 671 (12 March 1906) (t) (anti-trust case, subpoena during investigation) 44. U.S. v G Falk & Bro, 204 US 143; 27 S Ct 191; 51 L Ed 411 (7 Dec 1907) (t) (tax case). SCB: GA 4124, T.D. 19715; 145 F 475; 146 F 484 45. Perovich v U S, 205 US 86; 27 S Ct 456; 51 L Ed 722 (Alaska, 11 March 1907) (s) (i) 46. American Tobacco Co v Werckmeister, 207 US 284; 28 S Ct 72; 52 L Ed 208; 12 Ann Cas 595 (2 Dec 1907) (copyright infringement case). SCB: 76 CCA 647; 146 F 375 47. Werckmeister v American Tobacco Co, 207 US 375; 28 S Ct 124; 52 L Ed 254 (CA 2, 16 Dec 1907) (t) (copyright infringement case). SCB: 138 F 162; 74 CCA 682; 144 F 1023 48. Strauss v Com of Massachusetts, 207 US 599; 28 S Ct 253; 52 L Ed 358 (15 Oct 1907) (conspiracy in restraint of trade case). SCB: 188 Mass 229, 74 NE 308; 191 Mass 545, 78 NE 136, 11 LNS 968 49. Hairston v Danville & W R Co, 208 US 598; 28 S Ct 331; 52 L Ed 637 (Va, 24 Feb 1908) (t) (eminent domain case, taking private land over owner objection, to aid tobacco company transport) 50. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry Co v Calhoun, 213 US 1; 29 S Ct 321; 53 L Ed 671 (Okla, 23 Feb 1909) (s) (i) 51. Simmons v Steamship Jefferson, 215 US 130; 30 S Ct 54; 54 L Ed 125 (29 Nov 1909) (s) 52. Southwestern Oil Co v State of Texas, 217 US 114; 30 S Ct 496; 54 L Ed 688 (2 March 1910) (c) (preemption issue in tax case) 53. Flint v Stone Tracy Co, 220 US 107; 31 S Ct 342; 55 L Ed 389 (13 March 1911) (c) (i) 54. Hills & Co v Hoover, 220 US 329; 31 S Ct 402; 55 L Ed 485 (Pa, 3 April 1911) (t) (copyright infringement case applying Werckmeister single action doctrine) (i) 55. US v American Tobacco Co, 221 US 106; 31 S Ct 632; 55 L Ed 663 (29 May 1911) (c, s, t) (unlawful business practices, cigarette monopoly case) 56. Fifth Ave Coach Co v City of New York, 221 US 467; 31 S Ct 709; 55 L Ed 815 (29 May 1911) (s) (case upholding City authority to regulate tobacco advertising). SCB: 126 App Div 658; 110 NYS 1037; 58 Misc 405, 111 NYS 759 57. In re Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade of the City of New York, 222 US 578; 32 S Ct 833; 56 L Ed 323 (11 Dec 1911) (t) (jurisdictional technicalities) 58. Latimer v U S, 223 US 501; 32 S Ct 242; 56 L Ed 526 (PR, 19 Feb 1912) (t) (trade case, re tax on sweepings used in cigarettes) 59. Athanasaw v U S, 227 US 326; 33 S Ct 285; 57 L Ed 528 (24 Feb 1913) (s) (crime case, white slave issue, girl recruited for debauchery by smokers, reminiscent of pre-Civil War slavery) 60. Texas & P R. Co v Stewart, 228 US 357; 33 S Ct 548; 57 L Ed 875 (Texas, 21 April 1913) (s) (passenger injured leaving smoking car) 61. Norfolk & W.R. Co v Dixie Tobacco Co, 228 US 593; 33 S Ct 609; 57 L Ed 980 (12 May 1913) (t) (business practices case; issue of damage to tobacco in shipment). SCB: 111 Va 813; 69 SE 1106 62. U S v Shelley, 229 US 239; 33 S Ct 635; 57 L Ed 1167 (26 May 1913) (s) (tax on opium used for smoking) 63. International Harvester Co of America v Com. of Kentucky, 234 US 216; 34 S Ct 853; 58 L Ed 1284 (8 June 1914) (t) (business practices case; Kentucky law allowed tobacco growers to market in combination, but banned manufacturers from doing so; IHC appealed on constitutional grounds including vagueness, and prevailed) 64. Collins v Com. of Kentucky, 234 US 634; 34 S Ct 924; 58 L Ed 1510 (22 June 1914) (t) (farmer vs tobacco pool case). SCB: 141 Ky 565; 133 SW 233 65. Malone v Com. of Kentucky, 234 US 639; 34 S Ct 926; 58 L Ed 1512 (22 June 1914) (t) (farmer vs tobacco pool case). SCB: 141 Ky 570; 133 SW 235 66. Louis DeJonge & Co v Breuker & Kessler Co, 235 US 33; 35 S Ct 6; 59 L Ed 113 (9 Nov 1914) (t) (i) (aff'g Werckmeister, 207 US 284) 67. McCabe v Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co, 235 US 151; 35 S Ct 69; 59 L Ed 169 (Oklahoma, 30 Nov 1914) (s) (injunction requested to enjoin state law requiring RR segregation, denying equal accommodations) 68. Dodge v Osborn, Comm'r of Int Rev, 240 US 118; 36 S Ct 275; 60 L Ed 557 (DC, 21 Feb 1916) (t) (tax case) 69. Olson v State of North Dakota, 245 US 676; 38 S Ct 13; 62 L Ed 542 (17 Oct 1917) (anti-snuff law upheld in era of concern about tobacco adulteration). SCB: 26 ND 304; 144 NW 661 70. People's Tobacco Co v American Tobacco Co, 246 US 79; 38 S Ct 233; 62 L Ed 587; Ann Cas 1918C, 537 (4 March 1918) (c, t) (business practices case; anti-trust violation case seeking treble damages; issue of processing-serving technicality arose) 71. Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v Alhambra Cigar, 249 US 72; 39 S Ct 224; 63 L Ed 484 (Philippines, 3 March 1919) (c, t) (trade-name infringement case) 72. Board of Public Utility Com'rs v Manila Electric R & Light Co , 249 US 262; 39 S Ct 272; 63 L Ed 596 (24 March 1919) (c) (issue of free rides for police detectives, referencing Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v Alhambra Cigar, 249 US 72, supra 73. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co v Houston Ice & Brewing Co, 250 US 28; 39 S Ct 401; 63 L Ed 822 (19 May 1919) (t) (trademark deception case citing tobacco precedent) 74. Chipman Limited v Thomas B Jeffrey Co, 251 US 373; 40 S Ct 172; 64 L Ed 314 (19 Jan 1920) (t) (affirming People's Tobacco Co, 246 US 79) 75. Pierce v U S, 252 US 239; 40 S Ct 205; 64 L Ed 542 (8 March 1920) (s) (cites anti-war message depicting troops smoking, then a sign: "Less than 20 per cent. of these soldiers were alive at the close of the day") 76. C. C. Taft Co v State of Iowa, 252 US 569; 40 S Ct 345; 64 L Ed 720 (15 March 1920). SCB: 183 Iowa 548; 167 NW 467; 9 ALR 390 (institutionalizing the right to fresh and pure air via an 1897 cigarette ban) 77. City of New York v Consolidated Gas Co of New York, 253 US 219; 40 S Ct 511; 64 L Ed 870 (1 June 1920) (t) (jurisdictional issue citing precedents such as In re Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade, 222 US 578, supra) 78. Berlin Mills Co v Procter & Gamble Co, 254 US 156; 41 S Ct 75; 65 L Ed 196 (6 Dec 1920) (s) (i) 79. Nossaman v State of Kansas, 258 US 633; 42 S Ct 314; 66 L Ed 802 (20 Mar 1922). SCB: 107 Kan 715; 193 P 347 80. Rosenberg Bros & Co v Curtis Brown Co, 260 US 516; 43 S Ct 170; 67 L Ed 372 (2 Jan 1923) (t) (i) (technicality issue citing e.g., People's Tobacco Co v American Tobacco Co, 246 US 79, supra) 81. Minnesota Commercial Men's Assoc'n v Benn, 261 US 140; 43 S Ct 293; 67 L Ed 573 (1923) (t) (i) 82. US v Sischo, 262 US 165; 43 S Ct 511; 67 L Ed 925 (7 May 1923) (s) (opium tax case, as illegal, finding of no value, reversed). SCB: 262 F 1001; 270 F 958 83. Jones v Union Guano Co, 264 US 171; 44 S Ct 280; 68 L Ed 623 (NC, 18 Feb 1924) (t) (tobacco farmer case saying deleterious ingredients in fertilizer injured tobacco crop). SCB: 183 NC 338; 111 SE 612 84. Federal Trade Commission v American Tobacco Co, 264 US 298; 44 S Ct 336; 68 L Ed 696 (17 March 1924) (t) (business practices case; issue of discovery subpoena to ascertain any unfair competition) 85. Cannon Mfg Co v Cudahy Packing Co, 267 US 333; 45 S Ct 250; 69 L Ed 634 (2 March 1925) (t) (i) 86. Yee Hem v U. S., 268 US 178; 45 S Ct 470; 69 L Ed 904 (27 April 1925) (s) (smoking opium case) 87. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co v Doughton, 270 US 69; 46 S Ct 256; 70 L Ed 475 (1 March 1926) (t) (tax case) 88. U. S. v Swift & Co, 270 US 124; 46 S Ct 308; 70 L Ed 497 (1 March 1926) (s) (i) (bacon case) 89. Liberty Warehouse Co v Grannis, 273 US 70; 47 S Ct 282; 71 L Ed 541 (Ky, 3 Jan 1927) (t) (trade case) 90. Wong Tai v U.S., 273 US 77; 47 S Ct 300; 71 L Ed 545 (3 Jan 1927) (s) (i) (opium case) 91. Beech-Nut Packing Co v P. Lorillard Co, 273 US 629; 47 S Ct 481; 71 L Ed 810 (11 April 1927). SCB: 299 F 834; 7 F2d 967 (t) (business practices case; issues of unfair competition and trademark infringement) 92. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v U.S., 274 US 215; 47 S Ct 581; 71 L Ed 1006 (2 May 1927) (t) (eminent domain, cigarettes for Navy and Marines) 93. Phelps v U.S., 274 US 341; 47 S Ct 611; 71 L Ed 1083 (16 May 1927) (t) (i) (make whole, read laws to follow Constitution, per Fifth Amendment, pay interest)
95. Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v Collector of Internal Rev, 275 US 87; 48 S Ct 100; 72 L Ed 177 (21 Nov 1927) (t) (tax case) 96. Liberty Warehouse Co v Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-op Marketing, 276 US 71; 48 S Ct 291; 72 L Ed 473 (20 Feb 1928) (t) (unlawful trade practices) 97. Nigro v U.S., 276 US 332; 48 S Ct 388; 72 L Ed 600 (9 April 1928) (s) (narcotics case with dissent saying tobacco is treated differently) 98. Exchange Drug Co v State Tax Commission, 278 US 577; 49 S Ct 176; 73 L Ed 515 (2 Jan 1929). SCB: 218 Alabama 115; 117 So 673 (tax case) 99. Gilchrist v Interborough Rapid Transit Co, 279 US 159; 49 S Ct 282; 73 L Ed 652 (NY, 8 April 1929) (s) (rapid transit rate case, referencing ban on having more than one smoking car per train) 100. Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas, 279 US 306; 49 S Ct 304; 73 L Ed 704 (8 April 1929) (t) SCB: 26 Philippines Official Gazette #65 p 1712 101. American Tobacco Co v Porto Rican-American Tobacco Co, 279 US 858; 49 S Ct 353; 73 L Ed 999 (29 April 1929). SCB 30 F2d 234 102. Waite v U. S., 282 US 508; 51 S Ct 227; 75 L Ed 494 (24 Feb 1931) (t) (i) (interest) 103. Packer Corp v State of Utah, 285 US 105; 52 S Ct 273; 76 L Ed 643 (23 Feb 1932) (c, s, t) (advertising ban case). SCB: 78 Utah 177; 2 P2d 114 104. Capone v U.S., 286 US 553; 52 S Ct 503; 76 L Ed 1288 (2 May 1932) (smoker pattern of crime case). SCB: 56 F2d 927; 30 STC 885 105. Burnet, Comm'r of Int Revenue v Commonwealth Improvement Co, 287 US 415; 53 S Ct 198; 77 L Ed 399 (12 Dec 1932). SCB: 57 F2d 47 (t) (tax case) 106. Rogers v Guaranty Trust Co of New York and American Tobacco Co, 288 US 123; 57 S Ct 295; 77 L Ed 652 (23 Jan 1933) (t) (stockholder case). SCB: 60 F2d 106 aff'd 60 F2d 114 107. Consolidated Textile Corp. v Gregory, 289 US 85; 53 S Ct 529; 77 L Ed 1047 (10 April 1933) (t) (i) (service) 108. Rogers v Hill, Goeorge, President, American Tobacco Co, 289 US 582; 53 S Ct 731; 77 L Ed 1385 (19 May 1933) (s, t) (stockholder case). SCB: 62 F2d 1079 109. British-American Tobacco Co v Helvering, Com'r of Internal Revenue, 293 US 95; 55 S Ct 55; 79 L Ed 218 (5 Nov 1934) (t) (tax case) 110. Bayside Fish Flour Co v Gentry, 297 US 422; 56 S Ct 513; 80 L Ed 772 (2 March 1936) (s) (police power v commerce clause, citing anti-feigning precedent) 111. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v U.S., 299 US 383; 57 S Ct 239; 81 L Ed 294 (4 Jan 1937) (s, t) (tax case) 112. Musser v Sheppard, 299 US 513; 57 S Ct 121; 78 L Ed 379 (9 Nov 1936). SCB: 127 Tex 193; 92 SW 2d 219 113. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v United States, 300 US 686; 57 S Ct 28; 81 L Ed (1937). SCB: 299 US 383 114. Townsend v Yeomans, Attorney General of Georgia, 301 US 441; 57 S Ct 842; 81 L Ed 1210 (MD Ga, 24 May 1937) (c, t) (warehousemen fees case) 115. Carmichael v Southern Coal & Coke Co, 301 US 495; 57 S Ct 868; 81 L Ed 1245 (MD Alabama, 24 May 1937) (c) (case citing use of cigarette and tobacco taxes in Georgia for pensions for Confederate soldiers) 116. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co v Robertson, Com'r of Internal Revenue, 304 US 563; 58 S Ct 944; 82 L Ed 1530 (25 April 1938) (t) SCB: 22 F Supp 187; 94 F2d 167 (tax case) 117. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co v Robertson, Com'r of Internal Revenue, 304 US 589; 58 S Ct 1045; 82 L Ed 1549 (23 May 1938) (t) SCB: 22 F Supp 187; 94 F2d 167 (tax case) 118. Helvering, Com'r of Internal Revenue v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 305 US 587; 59 S Ct 101 (17 Oct 1938). SCB: 97 F2d 302; 35 BTA 949 (tax case) 119. Currin v Wallace, Sec'y of Agriculture, 306 US 1; 59 S Ct 379; 83 L Ed 441 (NC, 30 Jan 1939) (t). SCB: 19 F Supp 211; 95 F2d 856 (case of opposition to Tobacco Inspection Act) 120. Helvering, Com'r of Internal Revenue v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 306 US 110; 59 S Ct 423; 83 L Ed 536 (30 Jan 1939) (t) SCB: 97 F2d 302; 35 BTA 949 (tax case) 121. First Chrold Corp v Com'r of Internal Revenue, 306 US 117; 59 S Ct 427; 83 L Ed 542 (6 Jan 1939) (t) 122. Mulford v Smith, 307 US 38; 59 S Ct 648; 83 L Ed 1092 (Ga, 17 April 1939) (t) SCB: 24 F Supp 919 (tobacco quota case) 123. Rasquin v Humphreys, 308 US 54; 60 S Ct 560; 84 L Ed 77 (6 Nov 1939) (t) (i) (tax case) 124. National Labor Relations Board v Bradford Dyeing Assoc'n, 310 US 318; 60 US 918; 84 L Ed 1226 (20 May 1940) (s) SCB: 106 F2d 119 (issues including discharge for smoking) 125. Cuno Engineering Corp v Automatic Devices Corp, 314 US 84; 62 S Ct 37; 86 L Ed 58 (10 Nov 1941) (c) (patent infringement case). SCB: 34 F Supp 146; 117 F2d 361 126. Lisenba v People of State of California, 314 US 219; 62 S Ct 280; 86 L Ed 166 (8 Dec 1941) (smoker murdered his wives, 1932-1935, using hammer blows, snake bite, drowning, for accidental death insurance). SCB: 89 P2d 39 reh den 14 Cal 2d 403, 94 P2d 569 127. National Labor Relations Board v P. Lorillard Co, 314 US 512; 62 S Ct 397; 86 L Ed 380 (5 Jan 1942) (t) (unfair labor practices, ordered to obey NLRB decision) 128. Ward v State of Texas, 316 US 547; 62 S Ct 1139; 86 L Ed 1663 (1 June 1942) (c) (issues including burning suspect with cigarettes to extort confession to crime) SCB: 158 SW2d 516 129. Tot v U.S., 319 US 463; 63 S Ct 1241; 87 L Ed 1519 (7 June 1943) (s) (i) (unwarranted presumption) 130. Ashcraft v State of Tennessee, 322 US 143; 64 S Ct 921; 88 L Ed 1192 (1 May 1944) (c) (smoker confession of crime case) 131. International Shoe Co v Washington, 326 US 310; 66 S Ct 154; 90 L Ed 95 (3 Dec 1945) (t) (i)
(unemployment compensation)
133. Kotteakos v U.S, 328 US 750; 66 S Ct 1239; 90 L Ed 1557 (10 June 1946) (c) (issues including crime by cigarette and pinball machine business opeators) 134. American, Liggett & Myers, and R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Cos v US, 328 US 781; 66 S Ct 1125; 90 L Ed 1575 (10 June 1946) (c, s, t) (unlawful business practices case). SCB: 39 F Supp 957; 147 F2d 93 135. Haupt v U.S., 330 US 631; 67 S Ct 874; 91 L Ed 1145 (31 March 1947) (s) (i) (disregard fantasy exceptions) 136. Johnson v U. S., 333 US 10; 68 S Ct 367; 92 L Ed 436 (2 Feb 1948) (s) (opium smoking search warrant case, atty James Skelley Wright) 137. US v Scophony Corp of America, 333 US 795; 68 S Ct 855; 92 L Ed 1091 (26 April 1948) (t) (i)
(jurisdiction/service issues)
139. U.S. v Rabinowitz, 339 US 56; 70 S Ct 430; 94 L Ed 653 (20 Feb 1950) (s) (i) (smoking gun) 140. Flickinger v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 340 US 843; 71 S Ct 33; 95 L Ed 618 (9 Oct 1950). SCB: 365 Pa 59; 73 A2d 652 141. Jordan v De George, 341 US 223; 71 S Ct 703; 95 L Ed 886 (7 May 1951) (c) (moral turpitude, deportation, example: cheating on cigarette tax) 142. Dalehite v U.S., 346 US 15; 73 S Ct 956; 97 L Ed 1427 (8 June 1953) (s). SCB: 197 F2d 771 (issue of smoking-caused fire case, with large explosion killing 560 and injuring 3,000 people) 143. Moore v Mead's Fine Bread Co, 348 US 115; 75 S Ct 148; 99 L Ed 145 (6 Dec 1954) (t) (unfair competition case) 144. General Drivers, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v American Tobacco Co, 348 US 978; 75 S Ct 569; 99 L Ed 762 (4 April 1955). SCB: 264 SW2d 250 145. Mitchell, Sec'y of Labor v May Tobacco Co, Budd & Co, et al, 350 US 473; 76 S Ct 527; 100 L Ed 565 (Fla, 26 March 1956) (t) (tobacco mfg employees pay case) SCB: 114 F Supp 865; 221 F2d 406 146. U.S. v du Pont & Co, 351 US 377; 76 S Ct 527; 100 L Ed 565 (11 June 1956) (c) (tobacco wrapper monopoly case) 147. Kremen v U.S., 353 US 346; 77 S Ct 828; 1 L Ed 2d 876 (13 May 1957) (c, s, t) (i) (illegal search) 148. Black v Magnolia Liquor Co, 355 US 24; 78 S Ct 106; 2 L Ed 2d 5 (12 Nov 1957) (t) (i) 149. Crooker v State of California, 357 US 433; 78 S Ct 1287; 2 L Ed 2d 1448 (30 June 1958) (smoker murder case, murder of his paramour on her leaving him). SCB: 47 Cal 2d 348; 303 P2d 753 150. Cooper v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 358 US 875; 79 S Ct 112; 3 L Ed 2d 105 (27 Oct 1958) (product liability case). SCB: 158 F Supp 22; 256 F2d 464 151. Huron Cement Co v Detroit, 362 US 440 (25 April 1960). SCB 355 Mich 227; 93 NW2d 888 (pure air case) 152. Times Film Corp v Chicago, 365 US 43; 81 S Ct 391; 5 L Ed 2d 403 (23 Jan 1961) (c) (movie censorship case noting that "An early version of Carmen was condemned on several different grounds. The Ohio censor objected because cigarette-girls smoked cigarettes in public.") 153. Chapman v U.S., 365 US 610; 81 S Ct 776; 5 L Ed 2d 828 (3 April 1961) (s) (cites law to summarily destroy items leading to alcohol use) 154. Campbell, Comm'r of Agriculture of Georgia, et al v Hussey, et al, 368 US 297; 82 S Ct 327; 7 L Ed 2d 299 (18 Dec 1961). SCB: 189 F Supp 54 (t) (business practices case, Federal Tobacco Inspection Act labeling clause pre-empts Georgia's) 155. United States v Republic of France, 369 US 804; 82 S Ct 644; 7 L Ed 2d 550 (26 Feb 1962) (fire case). SCB: 171 F Supp 497; 290 F2d 395 156. Robinson v California, 370 US 660; 82 S Ct 1417; 8 L Ed 2d 758 (25 June 1962) (c) (jailing sick people, e.g., drug addicts, violates the 8th Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment; we know that "[t]he first step toward addiction may be as innocent as a boy's puff on a cigarette in an alleyway" so the better approach is to ban the gateway drug, as per the Tennessee and Michigan examples, hence prevent drug use as it is a problem disproportionately among smokers. The now rampant disregard of this constitutional principle is due to some amount of bribery of legislators and judges.) 157. Giles v Maryland, 372 US 767; 83 S Ct 1102; 10 L Ed 2d 137 (22 April 1963) SCB: 229 Md 370; 183 A2d 359 (rape-by-smokers case) 158. Wong Sun v U.S., 371 US 471; 83 S Ct 407; 9 L Ed 2d 441 (14 June 1963) (c) (heroin for 5-6 cigarettes) 159. US v Philadelphia Nat. Bank, 374 US 321; 83 S Ct 1715; 10 L Ed 2d 915 (17 June 1963) (c) (cites monopoly overview) 160. Head dba Lea County Publishing Co v New Mexico Bd of Examiners, 374 US 424; 83 S Ct 1759; 10 L Ed 2d 983 (17 June 1963) (c) (advertising ban case, upheld citing a long line of "police power" cases) 161. Dresner v City of Tallahassee, 375 US 136; 84 S Ct 235; 11 L Ed 2d 208 (2 Dec 1963) (c) SCB: 134 So 2d 228 (cigarette machine prices doubled when "Freedom Riders" came) 162. Lartique v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 375 US 865; 84 S Ct 137; 11 L Ed 2d 92 (14 Oct 1963). SCB: 317 F2d 19 163. American Tobacco Co v Green, 377 US 943; 84 S Ct 1349; 12 L Ed 2d 306 (25 May 1964). SCB: 325 F2d 673 164. Henry v Mississippi, 379 US 443; 85 S Ct 564; 13 L Ed 2d 408 (18 Jan 1965) (c) SCB: 154 So 2d 289 (cigarette lighter evidence) 165. U.S. v Ventresca, 380 US 102; 85 S Ct 741; 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1 March 1965) (t) SCB: 324 F2d 864 (Alcohol & Tobacco Tax Division, IRS, illegal distillery case) (i) 166. Morton Salt Co v U.S., 382 US 44; 86 S Ct 181; 15 L Ed 2d 36 (25 Oct 1965) (t) (citing American Tobacco Co, 328 US 781, anti-trust case) 167. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v Pritchard, 382 US 987; 86 S Ct 549; 15 L Ed 2d 475 (17 Jan 1966). SCB: 350 F2d 479 168. Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375; 86 S Ct 836; 15 L Ed 2d 815 (7 March 1966) SCB: 22 Ill 2d 162, 174 NE2d 820; 368 U.S. 995; 345 F2d 691 (c) (brain-damaged suicidal smoker murdered his wife and child) 169. Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (13 June 1966) (c) (the famous case ordering police to read suspects their rights, citing as an example, an incident/case wherein "the police brutally beat, kicked and placed lighted cigarette butts on the back of a potential witness under interrogation for the purpose of securing a statement incriminating a third party") (see subsequent prison cases) 170. Giles v Maryland, 386 US 66; 87 S Ct 793; 17 L Ed 2d 737 (20 Feb 1967) (c) SCB: 239 Md 458, 212 A2d 101; 231 Md 387, 190 A2d 627; 372 US 767, 83 S Ct 1102, 10 L Ed 2d 137; 229 Md 370, 183 A2d 359 (rape-by-smokers case) 171. McCray v Illinois, 386 US 300; 87 S Ct 1056; 18 L Ed 2d 62 (20 March 1967) (c) SCB: 33 Ill 2d 66; 210 NE2d 161 (heroin in cigarette package) 172. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v Pritchard, 386 US 1009; 87 S Ct 1350; 18 L Ed 2d 436 (17 April 1967). SCB: 370 F2d 95 173. Lordi v Epstein dba Stratford International Tobacco Co, 389 US 29; 88 S Ct 106; 19 L Ed 2d 29 (NJ, 16 Oct 1967) (t) SCB: 261 F Supp 921 (licensing case) 174. Leary v U.S., 395 US 6; 89 S Ct 1532; 23 L Ed 2d 57 (19 May 1969). SCB: 383 F2d 851, 392 F2d 220 (c, s) (marijuana case, p 41 tracing history to near-exclusive use solely by poverty-stricken minorities) 175. Russell v U.S., 395 US 928; 89 S Ct 1786; 23 L Ed 2d 245 (26 May 1969). SCB: 133 App DC 77; 408 F2d 1280 (stolen cigarettes case) 176. Turner v U.S., 396 US 398; 90 S Ct 642; 24 L Ed 2d 610 (20 Jan 1969) (s) SCB: 404 F2d 782 (narcotics case, using "presumptions" and "inferences" to convict) 177. Tobacco Institute, Inc, National Association of Broadcasters, and American Broadcasting Co v Federal Communications Commission, 396 US 842; 90 S Ct 50; 24 L Ed 2d 93 (13 Oct 1969). SCB: 132 US App DC 14; 405 F2d 1082 (upholding the equal time rule, applying it to tobacco ads, allowing rebuttals of advertiser claims, as the real truth is, tobacco is hazardous) 178. National Broadcasting Co v Federal Communications Commission, 396 US 842; 90 S Ct 51; 24 L Ed 2d 93 (13 Oct 1969). SCB: 132 US App DC 14; 405 F2d 1082 (upholding the equal time rule, applying it to tobacco, allowing rebuttals of its claims) 179. U.S. v Kordel, 397 US 1; 90 S Ct 763; 25 L Ed 2d 1 (24 Feb 1970) (c) (i) 180. Green v American Tobacco Co, 397 US 911; 90 S Ct 912; 25 L Ed 2d 93 (24 Feb 1970) (product liability case).
181. Durham v U.S., 401 US 481; 91 S Ct 858; 28 L Ed 2d 200 (8 March 1971) (t) (i) 182. McGautha v California and Crampton v Ohio, 402 US 183; 91 S Ct 1454; 28 L Ed 2d 711 (3 May 1971) (c) (i). SCB: 70 Cal 2d 770, 452 P2d 650; 18 Ohio St 2d 182, 248 NE2d 614
(jury nullification history; typical denial of responsibility)
184. Lemon v Kurtzman, 403 US 602; 91 S Ct 2105, 2125, 2135; 29 L Ed 2d 745 (28 June 1971) (c) (Pennsylvania school subsidy from cigarette tax) 185. Richard Speck v People, 403 US 946; 91 S Ct 2279; 29 L Ed 2d 855 (28 June 1971). SCB: 41 Ill 2d 177; 242 NE2d 208 (smoker crime case) 186. Donaldson v California, 404 US 968; 92 S Ct 332; 30 L Ed 2d 288 (22 Nov 1971) (c, s) (i) 187. Federal Trade Commission v Sperry & Hutchinson Co, 405 US 233; 92 S Ct 898; 31 L Ed 2d 170 (1 March 1972) (s) (unfair trade practices case, citing FTC criteria used on tobacco) 188. Lauchli v US, 405 US 965; 92 S Ct 1182; 31 L Ed 2d 241 (CA 7, 28 Feb 1972) (t) (BATF civil rights violation case) 189. Capital Broadcasting Co v Kleindienst, Attorney General, 405 US 1000; 92 S Ct 1289; 31 L Ed 2d 472 (27 March 1972). SCB: 333 F Supp 582 (summarily affirming district court decision sustaining the constitutionality of the 15 USC § 1335 law prohibiting electronic media from carrying cigarette advertisements) 190. Joseph v US, 405 US 1006; 92 S Ct 1274; 31 L Ed 473 (27 March 1972) (s) (confession of error). SCB: 438 F2d 1233 191. Branzburg v Hayes, 408 US 665; 92 S Ct 2646, 2686; 33 L Ed 2d 626 (29 June 1972) (s) (reporter must testify to post-gateway drug use observed in source) 192. Preiser v Rodriguez, 411 US 475; 93 S Ct 1827; 36 L Ed 2d 439 (NY, 7 May 1973) (s) SCB: 456 F2d 79 (issue of specific v general law, in the "cigar-smoking S. O. B." case) 193. Columbia Broadcasting v Democratic Comm, 412 US 94; 93 S Ct 2080; 36 L Ed 2d 772 (29 May 1973) (c) (citing ubiquitous nature of broadcast ads, and referencing Banzhaf precedent on cigarette advertising) 194. Pittsburgh Press Co v Human Rel. Comm'n, 413 US 376; 93 S Ct 2553; 37 L Ed 2d 669 (21 June 1973) (c) ("purely commercial advertising" [here, sex-discriminating job ads] lack First Amendment protection, citing Capital Broadcasting, supra, example of banning cigareatte ads) 195. Sloan v Lemon, 413 US 825; 93 S Ct 2982; 37 L Ed 2d 939 (25 June 1973) (c) (Pennsylvania school subsidy from cigarette tax) 196. U.S. v Robinson, 414 US 218; 94 S Ct 467, 494; 38 L Ed 2d 427 (DC, 11 Dec 1973) (c) SCB: 145 US App DC 46; 447 F2d 1215 (search and seizure case, finding heroin in cigarette package) 197. Gustafson v Florida, 414 US 260; 94 S Ct 488; 38 L Ed 2d 456 (11 Dec 1973) (c) SCB: 258 So 2d 1 (post-gateway drug search and seizure case, expanding the right to do pursuant to the that-day-announced Robinson cigarette case) 198. Calero-Toledo v Pearson Yacht Leasing Co, 416 US 663; 94 S Ct 2080; 40 L Ed 2d 452 (PR, 15 May 1974) (c) SCB: 363 F Supp 1337 (seizure of innocent owner's rental boat used for post-gateway drug transport) 199. Albright v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 416 US 951; 94 S Ct 961; 40 L Ed 2d 301 (15 April 1974). SCB: 350 F Supp 341; 485 F2d 678 200. Lehman v City of Shaker Heights, 418 US 298; 94 S Ct 2714; 41 L Ed 2d 770 (Ohio, 25 June 1974) (c, s) SCB: 34 Ohio St 2d 143; 296 NE2d 683 (issue of law allowing pro-cigarette advertising but not political candidate advertising) 201. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v Conrad, 420 US 546; 95 S Ct 1239; 43 L Ed 2d 448 (Tenn, 18 March 1975) (s) (i) 202. Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590; 95 S Ct 2254; 45 L Ed 2d 416 (26 June 1975) (s) SCB: 56 Ill 2d 312; 307 NE2d 356 (marijuana smoker murder case) 203. U.S. v Watson, 423 US 411; 96 S Ct 820; 46 L Ed 2d 598 (CA 9, 26 Jan 1976) (c) SCB: 504 F2d 849 (cigarette signal of stolen property, with narrative on common law arrest process) 204. Moe v Salish & Kootenai Tribes, 425 US 463; 96 S Ct 1634; 48 L Ed 2d 96 (Montana, 27 April 1976) (c) SCB: 392 F Supp 1297 and 1325 (Indian reservation cigarette sales tax case) 205. Albright v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 426 US 907; 96 S Ct 2229; 48 L Ed 2d 832 (Penn, 1 June 1976). SCB: 463 F Supp 1220; 531 F2d 132 (smokers' rights case) 206a. Hankerson v North Carolina, 432 US 233; 97 S Ct 2339; 53 L Ed 2d 306 (17 June 1977) (c) SCB: 288 NC 632; 220 SE2d 575 (smoker murder case) 206b. Pons v Lorillard, 434 US 575; 98 S Ct 866; 55 L Ed 2d 40 (NC, 22 Feb 1978). SCB: 69 FRD 576; 549 F2d 950 (employee age discrimination case, jury trial issue) 206c. U. S. v Frumento, 434 US 1072; 98 S Ct 1256; 55 L Ed 2d 775, 46 U.S.L.W. 1042 (20 Sep 1977) cert den 434 US 1072; 98 S Ct 1258; 55 L Ed 2d 776. SCB: 409 F Supp 136 (ED Pa, 1976), 563 F2d 1083. 207. Carey v Piphus, 435 US 247; 98 S Ct 1042; 55 L Ed 2d 252 (Ill, 21 March 1978) (c, s) SCB: 545 F2d 30 (student smoker case; procedural due process is "absolute" constitutional right) 208. Holt Civic Club v Tuscaloosa, 439 US 60; 99 S Ct 383; 58 L Ed 2d 292 (Alabama, 28 Nov 1978) (c, s) (city authority, cigarette tax and bus smoking ban) 209. New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Calif. v Orrin W. Fox Co, 439 US 96; 99 S Ct 403; 58 L Ed 2d 361 (Cal, 5 Dec 1978) (c) (license case, citing precedents such as Gundling, supra) 210. Gasper v Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District, 439 US 1073; 99 S Ct 846; 59 L Ed 2d 40 (8 Jan 1979). SCB: 418 F Supp 716; 577 F2d 897; 581 F2d 267 211. Michigan v DeFillippo, 443 US 31; 99 S Ct 2627; 61 L Ed 2d 343 (25 June 1979) (c) SCB: 80 Mich App 197; 262 NW2d 921 (marijuana in cigarette package) 212. Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85; 100 S Ct 338; 62 L Ed 238 (28 Nov 1979) (c) SCB: 58 Ill App 3d 57; 373 NE2d 1013 (cigarette pack containing heroin) 213. Federal Employees for Nonsmokers' Rights v U.S., 444 US 926; 100 S Ct 265; 62 L Ed 2d 182 (29 Oct 1979). SCB: 446 F Supp 181; 194 US App DC 391; 598 F2d 310 214. Rhode Island v Innis, 446 US 291; 100 S Ct 1682; 64 L Ed 2d 297 (RI, 12 May 1980) (c) SCB: 120 RI; 391 A2d 1158 (smoker robbery, kidnapping, murder case) 215. Washington v Confederated Tribes, 447 US 134; 100 S Ct 2069; 65 L Ed 2d 10 (10 June 1980) (c) (tax case). SCB: 446 F Supp 1339 216. Carson v American Brands, Inc, 450 US 79; 101 S Ct 993; 67 L Ed 2d 59 (25 Feb 1981). SCB: 606 F2d 420; 446 F Supp 780 217. Albernaz et al. v U.S., 450 US 333; 101 S Ct 1137; 67 L Ed 2d 275 (1981) (t) 218. New York v Belton, 453 US 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) (c) 219. Citizens Against Rent Control v Berkeley, 454 US 290; 102 S Ct 434; 70 L Ed 2d 492 (1981) (s) 220. Hoffman Estates v Flipside, Hoffman Estates, 455 US 489; 102 S Ct 1186; 71 L Ed 2d 362 (1982) (c,s) 221. American Tobacco Co v Patterson, 456 US 63; 102 S Ct 1534; 71 L Ed 2d 748 (5 April 1982) (t) (issue of racial discrimination on the job). SCB: 634 F2d 744 222. Ramah Navajo School Bd. v Bureau of Revenue, 458 US 832; 102 S Ct 3394; 73 L Ed 2d 1174 (2 July 1982) (c) (i) 223. Diefenthal v Civil Aeronautics Board, 459 US 1107; 103 S Ct 732; 74 L Ed 2d 956 (10 Jan 1983). SCB: 681 F2d 1039 224. New Mexico v Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 US 324; 103 S Ct 2378; 76 L Ed 2d 64 (13 June 1983) (c) (i) 225. Illinois v Lafayette, 462 US 640; 103 S Ct 2605; 77 L Ed 2d 65 (1983) (c) 226. Rice v Rehner, 463 US 713; 103 S Ct 3291; 77 L Ed 2d 961 (1983) (c) 227. Arizona Governing Committee v Norris, 463 US 1073; 103 S Ct 3492; 77 L Ed 2d 1236 (1983) (s) 228. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp v Federal Trade Commission, 465 US 1100; 104 S Ct 595; 80 L Ed 2d 127 (19 March 1984). SCB: 710 F2d 1165; 717 F2d 963 229. Berkemer v McCarty, 468 US 420; 104 S Ct 3138; 82 L Ed 2d 317 (1984) (s) 230. New Jersey v T. L. O, 469 US 325; 105 S Ct 733; 83 L Ed 2d 720 (1985). SCB: 94 NJ 331; 463 A2d 934 (c, s) 231. John Wayne Gacy v People, 470 US 1037; 105 S Ct 1410; 84 L Ed 2d 799 (4 March 1985). SCB: 103 Ill 2d 1; 82 Ill Dec 391; 468 NE2d 1171 (smoker crime case) 232. Harper & Row v Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539; 105 S Ct 2218; 85 L Ed 2d 588 (1985) (s) 233. California Bd. of Equalization v Chemehuevi Tribe, 474 US 9; 106 S Ct 289; 88 L Ed 2d 9 (1985). SCB: 492 F Supp 55; 757 F2d 1047 (c) 234. Malley v Briggs, 475 US 335; 106 S Ct 1092; 89 L Ed 2d 271 (1986) (c, s) 235. Sorenson v Secretary of Treasury, 475 US 851; 106 S Ct 1092; 89 L Ed 2d 271 (1986) (s) 236. Memphis Community School Dist. v Stachura, 477 US 299; 106 S Ct 2537; 91 L Ed 2d 249 (1986) (s) 237. Dept of Treasury v Galioto, 477 US 556; 106 S Ct 2683; 91 L Ed 2d 459 (1986) (t) 238. Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc'n v Tourism Co, 478 US 328; 106 S Ct 2968; 92 L Ed 2d 266 (1986) (c, s) 239. Bundy v State of Florida, 479 US 894; 107 S Ct 295; 93 L Ed 2d 269 (14 Oct 1986). SCB: 471 So 2d 9 (smoker crime case) 240. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co v Durham County, 479 US 130; 107 S Ct 499; 93 L Ed 2d 449 (9 Dec 1986) (tax case). SCB: 314 NC 540; 335 SE 2d 21 (t) 241. California v Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 US 202; 107 S Ct 1083; 94 L Ed 2d 244 (1987) (c) 242. Tanner v U.S., 483 US 107; 107 S Ct 2739; 97 L Ed 2d 90 (1987) (s) 243. Bundy v Dugger, 484 US 870; 108 S Ct 198; 98 L Ed 2d 149 (5 Oct 1987). SCB: 816 F2d 564 (smoker crime case) 244. Paperworkers v Misco, Inc, 484 US 29; 108 S Ct 364; 98 L Ed 2d 286 (CA 5, 1 Dec 1987) (c) (job marijuana cigarette smoke case) 245. Liggett Group, Inc v Cipollone, 484 US 976; 108 S Ct 487; 98 L Ed 2d 485 (7 Dec 1987). SCB: 593 F Supp 1146; 785 F2d 1108; 113 FRD 86; 822 F2d 335 246. Hustler Magazine v Falwell, 485 US 46; 108 S Ct 876; 99 L Ed 2d 41 (1988) (c) 247. Traynor v Turnage, 485 US 535; 108 S Ct 1372; 99 L Ed 2d 618 (1988) (s) 248. Employment Division v Smith, 485 US 660; 108 S Ct 1444; 99 L Ed 2d 753 (1988) (c) 249. CBS, Inc and Jacobson v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co, 485 US 993; 108 S Ct 1302; 99 L Ed 2d 512 (4 April 1988). SCB: 713 F2d 262; 644 F Supp 1240; 827 F2d 1119 (tobacco taboo case) 250. Liggett Group, Inc v Public Citizen, 488 US 1030; 109 S Ct 838; 102 L Ed 2d 970 (17 Jan 1989). SCB: 858 F2d 775; 15 Media Law Rev 2129; 12 FR Serv 3d 1099 251. Bundy v Dugger, 488 US 1036; 109 S Ct 887; 102 L Ed 2d 1009 (23 Jan 1989) (smoker crime case) 252. Cotton Petroleum Corp v New Mexico, 490 US 163; 109 S Ct 1698; 104 L Ed 2d 209 (25 April 1989) (c) (Indian tax case)/ SCB: 106 NM 517, 745 P2d 1170; 106 NM 511, 745 P2d 1159 253. John Wayne Gacy v People, 490 US 1085; 109 S Ct 2111; 104 L Ed 671 (22 May 1989). SCB: 125 Ill 2d 117; 125 Ill Dec 770; 530 NE2d 1340 (post-conviction smoker crime case issues) 254. Brendale, Wilkison and County of Yakima v Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, 492 US 408; 109 S Ct 2994; 106 L Ed 2d 343 (29 June 1989) (c) Indian rights case). SCB: 617 F Supp 735; 617 F Supp 750; 828 F2d 529 255. Wilkerson v Texas, 493 US 924; 110 S Ct 292; 107 L Ed 2d 272 (16 Oct 1989) (s) (death penalty case, cert den) 256. Wilson v Lynaugh, Dir, Texas Dept of Corrections, 493 US 969; 110 S Ct 417; 107 L Ed 2d 382 (13 Nov 1989). SCB: 878 F2d 846 257. University of Pennsylvania v EEOC, 493 US 182; 110 S Ct 577; 107 L Ed 2d 571 (9 Jan 1990) (s) (discrimination case, with "smoking gun" evidence) 258a. Tafflin v Levitt, 493 US 455; 110 S Ct 792; 107 L Ed 2d 887 (22 Jan 1990) (s) (RICO case, RICO is enforceable in all courts). SCB: 865 F2d 595 258b.Thomas J. Kline, Inc v Lorillard, Inc, 493 US 1073; 110 S Ct 1120; 107 L Ed 2d 1027 (20 Feb 1990). SCB: 674 F Supp 183; 878 F2d 791 SCB (business practices case) 259. Michigan v Harvey, 494 US 344; 106 S Ct 1176; 108 L Ed 2d 293 (5 March 1990) (s) (cocaine smoker case; statements secured by unlawful police conduct may nonetheless be used against the individual for impeachment purposes) 260. Florida v Wells, 495 US 1; 110 S Ct 1632; 109 L Ed 2d 1 (18 April 1990) (c) (marijuana smoker case, issue of searching impounded vehicle for incriminating evidence, during "inventory"). SCB: 539 So 2d 464 261. McKesson Corp v Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 496 US 18l; 110 S Ct 2238; 110 L Ed 2d 17 (4 June 1990) (t) (tax case, under the commerce clause). SCB: 524 So 2d 1000 262. U.S. v Eichman, 496 US 310; 110 S Ct 2404; 110 L Ed 2d 287 (11 June 1990) (c) (flag-burning case, dissent said, "In today's marketplace of ideas, the public burning of a Vietnam draft card is probably less provocative than lighting a cigarette"). SCB: 731 F Supp 415; 713 F Supp 1123 263. Pletten v Newman, 498 US 805; 111 S Ct 36; 112 L Ed 2d 13 (1 October 1990). SCB: 891 F2d 292 264. Pletten v Newman, 498 US 966; 111 S Ct 427; 112 L Ed 2d 411 (13 November 1990) 265. Pletten v Merit Systems Protection Bd, 498 US 1053; 111 S Ct 768; 112 L Ed 2d 787; 59 USLW 3482 (14 January 1991) (No. 90-5961). SCB: 908 F2d 973 266. Lamb v Philip Morris, Inc, 498 US 1086; 111 S Ct 961; 112 L Ed 2d 1048 (19 Feb 1991) (domestic growers vs importers case). SCB: 915 F2d 1024 267. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Oklahoma, 498 US 505; 111 S Ct 905; 112 L Ed 2d 1112 (26 Feb 1991) (c) SCB: 888 F2d 1303 (tax case) 268. Automobile Workers v Johnson Controls, Inc, 499 US 187; 111 S Ct 1196; 113 L Ed 2d 158 (1991) (c, s) 269. Pletten v Merit Systems Protection Bd, 499 US 913; 111 S Ct 1124; 113 L Ed 2d 232 (4 March 1991) (No. 90-5961). SCB: 891 F2d 292 270. Cipollone v Liggett Group, 499 US 935; 111 S Ct 1386; 113 L Ed 2d 443 (25 March 1991). SCB: 693 F Supp 208; 893 F2d 541 271. Pletten v Marsh, 501 US 1221; 111 S Ct 2836; 115 L Ed 2d 1005; 59 USLW 3838 (17 June 1991) (No. 90-7944). SCB: 920 F2d 933 272. Pauley v Bethenergy Mines, 501 US 680; 111 S Ct 2524; 115 L Ed 2d 604 (24 June 1991) (c, s) (black lung case) 273. Pletten v Marsh, 501 US 1221; 111 S Ct 2836; 115 L Ed 2d 1005; 59 USLW 3838 (Mich, 17 June 1991). SCB: 920 F2d 933 274. Pletten v Marsh, 501 US 1280; 112 S Ct 35; 115 L Ed 2d 1116 (Mich, 20 September 1991) 275. Yakima v Confederated Tribes, 502 US 251; 112 S Ct 683; 116 L Ed 2d 687 (14 Jan 1992) (c) 276. Hall v Turnage, 504 US 958; 112 S Ct 2310; 119 L Ed 2d 231 (1 June 1992). SCB: 693 F Supp 208; 893 F2d 541 277. Dept of Taxation & Fin. v Milhelm Attea & Bros, 502 US 1053; 112 S Ct 926; 117 L Ed 2d 99 (21 Jan 1992) (c) SCB: 164 App Div 2d 300, 564 NYS2d 491; 77 NY2d 989, 571 NYS2d 914, 575 NE2d 400; 78 NY2d 858; 575 NYS2d 454; 580 NE2d 1057 278. Sawyer v Whitley, 505 US 333; 112 S Ct 2514; 120 L Ed 2d 269 (22 June 1992) (c) ("actual innocence" exception in habeas corpus cases) 279. Cipollone v Liggett Group, Inc, 505 US 504; 112 S Ct 2608; 120 L Ed 2d 407 (24 June 1992). SCB: 693 F Supp 208; 893 F2d 541 (c, s) (issue of whether federal cigarette law preempts state law damage claims) 280. R.A.V. v St. Paul, 505 US 377; 112 S Ct 2538; 120 L Ed 2d 305 (27 June 1992) (c) (First Amendment case; symbol ban invalid as overbroad; contains reference by Justice Harry Blackmun to two things not really protected by the First Amendment, cigarette advertising and child pornography; of course, cigarettes are worse, as they directly injure the unborn, kill them, and kill infants 281. Pletten v Department of Army, 506 US 895; 113 S Ct 273; 121 L Ed 2d 201; 61 USLW 3263 (5 October 1992). SCB: 960 F2d 156 282. Brooke Group Ltd. v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 506 US 984; 113 S Ct 490; 121 L Ed 2d 428 (1993) (c) 283. City of Cincinnati v Discovery Network, Inc, et al, 507 US 410; 113 S Ct 1505; 123 L Ed 2d 99 (24 March 1993) (c) (1st Amendment case re free-standing newsracks; contains renewed reference by Justice Harry Blackmun to two things not really protected by the First Amendment, cigarette advertising and child pornography; of course, cigarettes are worse, as they directly injure the unborn, kill them, and kill infants). SCB: 946 F2d 464 284. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v Sac & Fox Nation, 508 US 114; 113 S Ct 1985; 124 L Ed 2d 30 (7 May 1993) (c) (states can't tax Indian tribes without prior Congressional approval) 285. Minnesota v Dickerson, 508 US 366; 113 S Ct 2130; 124 L Ed 2d 334 (7 June 1993) (c) (a cocaine search is invalid if the contraband decision is made after the search) 286. Helling v McKinney, 509 US 25; 113 S Ct 2475; 125 L Ed 2d 22 (18 June 1993) (c, s) (the TTS health risk is an 8th Amendment issue; cigarette smoking as cruel and unusal punishment violating Constitution) 287. Brooke Group Ltd. v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US 209; 113 S Ct 2578; 125 L Ed 2d 168 (21 June 1993) (c) (allegation of conspiracy to undercut prices reflecting predatory practices). SCB: 964 F2d 335 288. Johnson v Texas, 509 US 350; 113 S Ct 2658; 125 L Ed 2d 290 (24 June 1993) (s) (mitigate capital punishment sentencing per youth) 289. Brooke Group Ltd. v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US 940; 114 S Ct 13;125 L Ed 2d 765 (9 Aug 1993) (c) (reh den) 290. Gacy v Welborn, 510 US 899; 114 S Ct 269; 126 L Ed 2d 220 (3 Oct 1993). SCB: 1992 WL 211018 aff'd 994 F2d 305 (CA 7, Ill) (habeas corpus issues in smoker crime case) 291. Posters `n' Things, Ltd v U.S., 511 US 513; 114 S Ct 1747; 128 L Ed 2d 539 (23 May 1994) (c, s, t) (scienter and vagueness issues in FCSA drug paraphernalia case; all aspects impacting the body are covered, except the No. 1 killer, tobacco). SCB: 969 F2d 652 292. Dept of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, 511 US 767; 114 S Ct 1937; 128 L Ed 2d 767 (6 June 1994) (c) (drug case, with "double jeopardy" issue; discussion included reference to "customer demand" for cigarettes, showing a lack of awareness of the meaning of the simple legal concept of "informed consent" meaning that no nonsmoker-child-turned-smoker by tobacco company fraudulent business practices and advertising, has made an informed choice to create a "demand"; and citing cigarettes' supposed "benefits" to society, showing less awareness than children of a century ago on the subject). SCB: 145 BR 61; 986 F2d 1308 293. Dept of Taxation & Fin. v Milhelm Attea & Bros, Case 93-377, 512 US 61; 114 S Ct 2028; 129 L Ed 2d 52 (13 June 1994) (c) SCB: 164 App Div 2d 300, 564 NYS2d 491; 181 App Div 2d 210, 585 NYS; 81 NY2d 417, 615 NE2d 994 294. Gupton v Commonwealth of Virginia et al., 513 US 810; 115 S Ct 59; 130 L Ed 2d 17 (3 Oct 1994). SCB: 63 EPD (CCH) ¶ 42,768; 14 F3d 203 (job smoking case; details at ASH) 295. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co v Mangini, 513 US 1016; 115 S Ct 577; 130 L Ed 2d 493; 1994 US LEXIS 8361 (28 Nov 1994). SCB: 793 F Supp 925; 21 Cal Rptr 2d 232; 23 Cal Rptr 2d 592, 859 P2d 672; 7 Cal 4th 1057, 31 Cal Rptr 2d 358, 875 P2d 73 (injunction case concerning "Joe Camel" advertising re children) 296. Smith v Fruin, et al, 513 US 1083; 115 S Ct 735; 130 L Ed 2d 638 (9 Jan 1995). SCB: 28 F3d 646; 9 IER (BNA) Cases 1202 297. American Airlines, Inc. v Wolens, 513 US 219; 115 S Ct 817; 130 L Ed 2d 715 (Iowa, 18 Jan 1995) (c) (issue of whether fed law preempts state anti-fraud and breach-of-contract law) 298. Arizona v Evans, 514 US 1; 115 S Ct 1185; 131 L Ed 2d 34 (1 March 1995) (c) (4th Amendment evidence suppression case) 299. Freightliner Corp v Myrick, 514 US 280; 115 S Ct 1483; 131 L Ed 2d 385 (4 April 1995) (c) (preemption case re 15 USC § 1381) 300. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v Chickasaw Nation, 515 US 450; 115 S Ct 2214; 132 L Ed 2d 400 (14 June 1995) (c) (tax case) 301. Sandin v Conner, 515 US 472; 115 S Ct 2293; 132 L Ed 2d 418 (19 June 1995) (s) (regulations not prisoner liberty interest) 302. Vernonia School Dist. 47J v Acton, 515 US 646; 115 S Ct 2386; 132 L Ed 2d 564 (26 June 1995) (s) (school drug testing scam case vs 4th Amendment) 303. Michael v Shiley, Inc, 516 US 815; 116 S Ct 67; 133 L Ed 2d 29 (2 Oct 1995). SCB: Case 94-0959, 46 F3d 1316 (CA 3, ED Pennsylvania, 24 Oct 1994) (c) (preemption with cigarette law 15 § 1331, et seq., compared, claim of fraudulent promotion of product not preempted) 304. Kurtz v City of North Miami, 516 US 1043; 116 S Ct 701; 133 L Ed 2d 658 (8 Jan 1996). SCB: 625 So 2d 899; 653 So 2d 1025; 10 IER Cases (BNA) 865; 10.3 TPLR 2.73 (smoker job application case) 305. Bennis v Michigan, 516 US 442; 116 S Ct 994; 134 L Ed 2d 68 (4 March 1996) (c) (forfeiture case vs 5th and 14th Amendments) 306. BMW of North America, Inc v Gore, 517 US 559; 116 S Ct 1589; 134 L Ed 2d 809 (20 May 1996) (c) (issue of excessive punitive damages) 307. Gov. Romer v Evans, 517 US 620; 116 S Ct 1620; 134 L Ed 2d 855 (20 May 1996) (s) (issue of Colorado sex discrimination ban law vs 14th Amendment) 308. Philip Morris, Inc v CIR, 517 US 1220; 116 S Ct 1849; 134 L Ed 2d 949 (28 May 1996). SCB: 71 F3d 1040 309. Rosen v Ciga-Geigy Corp, 519 US 819; 117 S Ct 73; 136 L Ed 2d 33 (7 Oct 1996). SCB: 78 F3d 316 310. Michael Jenner v Warden Joe Class, 519 US 874; 117 S Ct 194; 136 L Ed 2d 131 (7 Oct 1996). SCB: 434 NW2d 276; 521 NW2d 422; 79 F3d 736 311. Allgood v R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, 519 US 930; 117 S Ct 300; 136 L Ed 2d 218 (15 Oct 1996) (product liability dangerous tobacco case). SCB: 80 F3d 168; CCH Prod Liab Rep ¶ 14656; 29 UCCRS 2d 496 312. Braun v Lorillard Inc, 519 US 992; 117 S Ct 480; 136 L Ed 2d 375 (18 Nov 1996) (product liability case). SCB: 84 F3d 230 313. Strate, Associate Tribal Judge, Tribal Court of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, et al. v A-1 Contractors et al, Case Num. 95-1872, 520 US 438; 117 S Ct 1404; 137 L Ed 2d 661 (28 April 1997) (c) (i) 314. Women Prisoners of District of Columbia Dep't of Corrections v District of Columbia, 520 US 1196; 117 S Ct 1552; 137 L Ed 2d 701; 1997 US LEXIS 2686 (28 April 1997). SCB: 877 F Supp 634, 98 Ed Law Rep 681; 899 F Supp 659, 104 Ed Law Rep 213; 320 US App DC 247, 93 F3d 910, 113 Ed Law Rep 30 315. Anheuser Busch Inc v Schmoke, Mayor of Baltimore, 520 US 1204; 117 S Ct 1569; 137 L Ed 2d 714 (28 January 1997). SCB: 855 F Supp 811; 63 F3d 1305; 101 F3d 325 316. Penn Advertising v Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 520 US 1204; 117 S Ct 1569; 137 L Ed 2d 715 (1997). SCB: 862 F Supp 1401; 63 F3d 1318; 518 US 1030, 116 S Ct 2575, 135 L Ed 2d 1090; 101 F3d 332 (advertising case) 316. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co v Buckley, 521 US 438; 117 S Ct 2113; 137 L Ed 2d 661 (23 June 1997) (s) (lawsuit by 15 year smoker, alleging that re asbestos, "the exposure created an added risk of death due to cancer, or to other asbestos related diseases of either 1% to 5% (in the view of one of plaintiff's experts), or 1% to 3% (in the view of another)" whereas cigarettes were reported in 1938 to increase risk of death, and are such that 37,000,000, 1/6 of the total U.S. population, is killed thereby!—a genuinely significant increase!!). SCB: 1992 WL 666051; 79 F3d 1337. 317. Amchem Products, Inc, et al. v Windsor, Case Num. 96-270; 521 US 591; 117 S Ct 2231; 138 L Ed 2d 689 (25 June 1997) (c, s) (asbestos case, class action). SCB: 771 F Supp 415; 834 F Supp 1437; 157 FRD 246; 158 FRD 314; 83 F3d 610 318. General Electric Co, et al. v Joiner, Case Num. 96-188; 522 US 136; 118 S Ct 512; 139 L Ed 2d 508 (15 Dec 1997) (c, s) (smoker lung cancer case with expert witness issue). SCB: 864 F Supp 1310; 78 F3d 524 319. US v US Shoe Corp, Case Num. 97-372; 523 US 360; 118 S Ct 1290; 140 L Ed 2d 453 (t) (31 March 1998) (tax case saying Pace v Burgess (1875), supra, is still a current good precedent). SCB: 907 F Supp 408; 114 F3d 1564 320. Philip Morris, Inc v Minnesota, 523 US 1056; 118 S Ct 1384; 140 L 643 (6 April 1998) 321. Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v Manufacturing Technologies, Inc, Case Num. 96-1037; 523 US 751; 118 S Ct 1700; 140 L Ed 2d 981 (26 May 1998) (c) (Indian rights case, essentially immune to state control, like any foreign country) 322. Faragher v City of Boca Raton, 524 US 775; 118 S Ct 2275; 141 L Ed 2d 981; 1998 WL 336322; Case Num. 97-282 (CA 11, Fla, 26 June 1998) (s) (on-job sexual harassment case, employer vicariously liable, comparable to smoking-on-job as courts develop more understanding). SCB: 864 F Supp 1552; 76 F3d 1155; 111 F3d 1530 323. Barnes v American Tobacco Co, 526 US 1114; 119 S Ct 1760; 143 L Ed 2d 791; 1999 US LEXIS 3264 (17 May 1999). SCB: 161 F3d 127 324. Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund, et al v Philip Morris, Inc, et al, 528 US 1080; 120 S Ct 799; 145 L Ed 2d 673; 2000 US LEXIS 185 (10 Jan 2000). SCB: 7 F Supp 2d 277; 191 F3d 229 (cost recovery case) 325. Yakama Indian Nation v Washington Dept of Revenue, 528 US 1116; 120 S Ct 935; 145 L Ed 2d 813 (18 Jan 2000). SCB: 873 F Supp 404; 78 F3d 1400; 955 F Supp 1229; 176 F3d 1241 (cigarette tax exemption allegation case) 326. FDA v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, Case No 98-1152; 529 US 120; 120 S Ct 1291; 146 L Ed 2d 121 (21 March 2000). SCB: 966 F Supp 1374; 153 F3d 155 (vote was 5-4; the three smokers [Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas] voting en bloc, nonsmokers splitting 4-2) 327. Thomas, Albert v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, Case No. 99-8229, 529 US 1073; 120 S Ct 1686; 146 L Ed 2d 493 (CA 11, 17 April 2000) 328. Buchanan v John Doe of Buglar and Brown & Williamson Cigarette Tobacco Corp, 529 US 1126; 120 S Ct 2025; 146 L Ed 2d 953 (22 May 2000). SCB: 198 F3d 244 329. Philip Morris, Inc, et al v Engle, 529 US 1144; 120 S Ct 2025; 146 L Ed 2d 975 (22 May 2000). SCB: 672 So 2d 39; 682 So 2d 1000 (smokers' rights class action case) 330. Sklaroff v Com of Pennsylvania by D. Michael Fisher, 531 US 917; 121 S Ct 276; 148 LEd 2d 201; 2000 US LEXIS 6515 (Pennsylvania certiorari denial, 2 Oct 2000). SCB: 736 A2d 693; 736 A2d 705 Pa A2d (Sklaroff intervention) 331. Hise v Philip Morris, Inc, 531 US 959; 121 S Ct 384; 148 L Ed 2d 96 (30 Oct 2000). SCB: 46 F Supp 2d 1201; 208 F3d 226 (smokers challenging the states' case settlement under anti-trust law) 332. Northwest Airlines v Duncan, 531 US 1058; 121 S Ct 650; 148 L Ed 2d 571 (10 Dec 2000) (6-3: Rehnquist, Scalia, O'Connor) (flight attendant second hand smoke pulmonary injury case). SCB: 208 F3d 1112 333. Lorillard Tobacco Co, et al v Thomas Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, 531 US 1068; 121 S Ct 755; 148 L Ed 2d 659; 2001 US LEXIS 42 (8 Jan 2001) SCB: 84 F Supp 2d 180; 218 F3d 30 (upholding Mass. tobacco law, certiorari granted) 334. Lorillard Tobacco Co v Thomas Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, 533 US 525; 121 S Ct 2404; 150 L Ed 2d 532 (28 June 2001) SCB: 218 F3d 30; 84 F Supp 2d 180; 76 F Supp 3d 124 (advertising regulation case; p 2430 says "tobacco use, particularly among children and adolescents, poses perhaps the single most significant threat to public health in the United States"). 335. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp v Grady Carter, 533 US 950; 121 S Ct 2593; 150 L Ed 2d 751 (29 June 2001). (smoker's rights lung cancer case). SCB: 778 So 2d 932; 723 So 2d 833 336. Abid M. Husain Estate v Olympic Airways, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (12 March 2003) (stay issued). SCB: 110 F Supp 2d 1234 (context) 337. Philip Morris v Williams, 02-1553; ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (Oregon, 7 October 2003) (more info). 338. Olympic Airways v Abid M. Husain Estate, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (24 Feb 2004) (travelers' rights case on pure air rights) 339. Philip Morris v Boeken, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (20 March 2006) (leaving intact $50 million punitive damages award). SCB ___ Cal ___; ___ Cal Rptr ___; ___ P3d ___ 340. Price, et al. v Philip Morris, 06-465, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (27 November 2006) (Article). SCB 341. Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (Florida, 1 Oct 2007) SCB (Article) 342. G. Steven Rowe, Attorney General of Maine v New Hampshire Motor Transport Association, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (20 February 2008). SCB: 448 F3d 66, 301 F Supp 2d 38. 343. California vs Philip Morris, ___ US ___; ___ S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (17 March 2008) SCB: ___ Cal Rptr ___; ___ P3d ___ 344. United States v Philip Morris USA, Inc., 130 S. Ct. 3501 (2010). SCB: 449 F.Supp.2d 1, (D.D.C. 2006), aff'd 556 F.3d 1095 (CA DC, 2010) 345. Gallagher v City of Clayton, Missouri, Docket 12-1122, ___ US ___; ___S Ct ___; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (14 May 2013). SCB: CA 8 (rejecting smoker claim that smoking is a right) |
For More Cases
|
Federal Legal Documents Research Site
Justice Tom C. Clark Papers |
