Welcome to the book, The Tobacco Habit: Its History and Pathology: A Study in Birth-Rates: Smokers Compared With Non-Smokers, by Herbert H. Tidswell, M.D. (1912).
It includes data on what is now a modern concern, the issue of abortion, showing the tobacco role in 53% of overall abortions,
Tobacco pushers and their accessories conceal the breadth of tobacco effects, the enormity of the tobacco holocaust, and the long record of documentation.
The concealment process is called the "tobacco taboo." Other pertinent words are "disinformation" and "censorship."
Here is the text by Herbert H. Tidswell, M.D. (who entered medical school in 1873), of an early exposé (1912) of tobacco dangers. It cites facts (including generational impact facts) you don't normally ever see, due to the "tobacco taboo."
The phrase "tobacco taboo" is the term for the pro-tobacco censorship policy—to not report most effects of tobacco.
As you will see, information about the tobacco danger was already being circulated in 1912, 52 years before the famous 1964 Surgeon General Report. Be prepared.
For example, women were often being blamed for sterility. But this data shows that the real culprit was tobacco, causing
  • a loss of 509 infants per 1,000 married men,
  • 53% of overall abortions,
  • in a 1:7 ratio to live-born,
  • and second-hand-smoke-caused involuntary abortions.
    In that era, the word "abortion" had not yet been politicized to exclude tobacco-caused fetal deaths to evade/obstruct counting and preventing them.
    Now tobacco-caused fetal deaths are pretended to be "spontaneous," a word to conceal the tobacco-causation!
    In that more honest 1912 era, the words "abortion and miscarriage were synonymous."
    As an overview, prior to reading this book, please read our sites on tobacco's ingredients and on tobacco-caused abortion.
  • The Tobacco Habit:
    Its History and Pathology:
    A Study in Birth-Rates: Smokers
    Compared With Non-Smokers
    ,

    by Herbert H. Tidswell, M.D.
    (London: J. & A. Churchill, 1912)


    Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, England;
    Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians, London;
    Late House-Surgeon to St. George's Hospital
    And Northampton Infirmary

    An Appeal to Medical Students
    And all Members of the Medical Professions who are
    true Christians and zealous in promoting true
    Hygiene and Temperance


    DEDICATION

    In Loving Memory of
    A GOOD FATHER AND A GOOD MOTHER.

    TO WHOM I AM INDEBTED, UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE,
    FOR ALL MY SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL BLESSINGS. TO
    MY MOTHER'S WISDOM AND MORAL COURAGE I OWE MY
    EMANCIPATION FROM THE SLAVERY OF THE TOBACCO
    HABIT, WHICH I UNHAPPILY ACQUIRED IN THE MEDICAL
    SCHOOL OF ST. GEORGE'S HOSPITAL, LONDON.

    -iv-

    Consider the words of the prophet Jeremiah:

    "Is there no physician there? Why then is not the
    health of the daughter of My people recovered?"

    Jeremiah viii. 22.

    -v-

    PREFACE

    The Author's aim is to call attention to the ill effects of Tobacco on all the functions of the body, but chiefly on those of the generative functions. The causes of sterility, abortion, still-birth, and other diseases of pregnancy are dealt with in detail. The causes of the falling birth-rates are discussed briefly, in simple language, so as to be intelligible to any educated person.

    H.H.T.

    KHARTOUM,
    TORQUAY.

    -vii-

    CONTENTS
    Dedicationiv
    Prefacevii
    I.—An Appeal to Medical Students and all Members of the Medical Profession who are true Christians and zealous in the cause of Hygiene 1-11
    II.—The History and Antiquity of the Tobacco Habit 12-18
    III.—A List of the Names of the Medical Men who contributed Letters to The Lancet, to be found in Vol I, 1857, condemning the use of Tobacco 19-24
    IV.—On "The Use and Abuse of Tobacco," by Wm. Marsden, M.D., living in Quebec in 1860, Fellow of the Medical Society of London 25-30
    V.—Remarks on The Lancet Tobacco Controversy of 1857, by the Author 31-41
    VI.—Mind your Mind and your Mind will mind your Body, and you will possess a sound Mind in a sound Body 42-53
    VII.—A Letter from G. J. Russell, M.D., dated from Christchurch, New Zealand, 1907, to the Editor of Beacon Light, the official organ of the British Anti-Tobacco League 54-59
    VIII.—The Evils of Tobacco Smoking in France. Letter from Dr. Hall. The Action of Tobacco on the Nervous System and the Heart. The Opinions of  

    -ix-

    French, English, and American Physicians. Malingering in the Army. Effects of Tobacco on Soldiers and Sailors60-69
    IX.—Twenty-four Cases of Tobacco Poisoning70-80
    X.—A Series of Thirty-eight Genealogical Histories of Families of Non-Smokers, with the number of Male and Female Births in each family; full particulars of the Miscarriages, Premature Births, Still-born Infants; Illnesses or Accidents in Pregnancy, Parturition, Lactation, and the ultimate Fate and State of each Child; with Tabular Abstract81-102
    XI.—A Series of Fifty-seven Histories of the Families of Smokers, with Similar Details; with Tabular Abstract103-137
    XII. —Tables of Comparison between Non-Smokers and Smokers in rates of Male and Female Infants; Conceptions; Abortions; Still-births; Ratio of Abortions and Still-births to Live-births; Mortality in first four years of life; Abnormal Confinements; Abscess of breast; Explanation of the causes of difference; Summary of defects in Class of Smokers138-152
    XIII.—Histories of the Families of ten Men who were Abusers of Alcohol and Tobacco, with Details as before, and Abstract153-160
    XIV.—Brief Records of the Families of Twenty-seven Non-Smokers among Acquaintances, Friends, and Patients not included in the other Histories; with Tabular Abstract161-166
    XV.—Abstract of the Families of Fifty-one Smokers among Acquaintances and Patients of all Classes; with Histories of selected Cases; Analytical Tables of Comparison and Explanations167-173

    -x-

    XVI—Ratio of Sexes at Birth. A Method for estimating the Annual Number of Cases of Abortion (including Still-born Infants) which may be traced to the Abuse of Tobacco by the Husbands; also the Number of Cases of Abortion from various Causes independent of Tobacco174-180
    XVII.—The Action of Tobacco Dust on Workers in Tobacco Factories; Dangers to Pregnant Women; Excessive Mortality among Children of the Workers; International Congress against the Abuse of Tobacco; Observations by Drs. Drysdale, Kostrall, and Omar Bey; The Influence of Tobacco in causing Abortion and Abscess of Breast; Children Poisoned by Tobacco in the Mother's Milk; Nicotism the Danger in Turkey; Alcoholism and Nicotine the Danger in England181-186
    CHAPTER XVIII.—Marriage; Causes of the falling Birth-rates in Great Britain and her Australian Colonies, and in many European Countries; Sterility in the Male and Female, considered separately and together; Opinions of Curling and Arthur Cooper on Causes of Male Sterility; Opinions of Dr. Matthews Duncan on Causes of Female Sterility; Tables showing age constitution of Bachelors and Spinsters at time of Marriage187-208
    XIX.—Table showing the Population of the United Kingdom each Year from 1821 to 1910, with the Annual Consumption of Tobacco; Table showing Increase of Population and Increase of Tobacco consumed in Decennial Periods; Table showing the fall in the Birth-rates in the United Kingdom, the Colonies of Australasia, the Chief Nations of Europe; Table showing Rise in Birth-rates in the Province of

    -xi-

    Ontario, Ceylon, Jamaica, Bulgaria, and Japan; Table showing Relative Fertility of Bich and Poor; Reasons for attributing these falling Birth-rates to the recent Increase in the Smoking Habit209-218
    XX —Analysis of Birth-rates of Smokers and Non-Smokers; Cause of low Birth-rate traced to great loss of Virile Power among Men, the result of habitual Abuse of Tobacco; Table covering a Period of Seventy Years, showing Marriage Rate, Birth-rate, Ratio of Births of Males to Females, and Ratio of Deaths of Males to Females; Table showing Fertility and Masculinity in my Classes; Table of Birth-rate and Masculinity in Scotland; Table showing Ratio of Males and Females in different Countries; Defects in general Birth-rate in population indentical with those of my Classes of Smokers219-232
    XXI.—Table showing Decline of Birth-rate and Masculinity in France; Table showing Masculinity in Illegitimate Births; Tables showing enormous excess of Male Infants to Females among Still-births in various Cities and Countries of Europe; Table showing Rate of Still-births in various Countries233-239
    XXII.—The Aim of Hygiene; The Office of Physicians; The Oath of Hippocrates; The Narcotic Slumbers of the British Medical Association, disturbed by the National Insurance Bill; The Baptismal Vow of the Christian240-246

    Ed. Note: Where footnotes or references to other books, or to medical journals, are given by Dr. Tidswell, generally they are in abbreviated form. The editor has provided a fuller bibliographic citation.

    -xii-

    CHAPTER I.

    AN APPEAL TO MEDICAL STUDENTS AND ALL MEMBERS OF
    THE MEDICAL PROFESSION WHO ARE TRUE CHRISTIANS,
    AND ZEALOUS IN THE CAUSE OF HYGIENE.

    BROTHER CHIPS AND FELLOW-LABOURERS,

    Let us consider for what purpose God has provided and trained a large body of medical practitioners? Why has He imparted to us knowledge and wisdom to relieve suffering, to prolong life, and even to stamp out or prevvent the spread of many terrible diseases which once devastated our land?

    I think God's purpose is that we should fulfil the work that Christ commenced, that is, the work of regenerating degenerate mankind. In order that we may fulfil our divine mission, God has bestowed upon us his Divine Spirit. His gifts of skill and wisdom are given now to His faithful ministers in answer to prayer, as in the days of the early Church.

    God is the giver of wisdom and knowledge through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The art of healing the sick and relievmg suffering is truly a divine gift, and we should consider ourselves highly honoured by God and the King, who rules by divine right, when we are admitted as members of the medical profession.

    It is necessary that we should be loyal to our spiritual Head, Christ the Savior; we must glorify His name and be faithful witnesses for Him. We are ministers of Christ m the same degree as the bishops, clergy, and other minsters of the Gospa, but we do not wish to exalt our office above theirs. Our work is only partly spiritual, their work is, or should be, entirely spiritual. We are

    -1-

    obliged to serve the needs of the body, but we do our work in a Christian spirit, knowing that the body of a Christian is a temple for the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

    Let each medical student and practitioner ask himself these questions:
    • What is my purpose in life?

    • Who comes first in all my thoughts in my daily work? God or self?
    Man's duty is to place God first, because man is the son of God. "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God" (Romans viii. 14).

    St. Paul was the greatest thinker and the clearest teacher that God has raised, and he wrote these trenchant and elevating words:
    "For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building. . . . Know ye not that ye are are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are" (1 Corinthians iii. 9, 16, 17).
    It is obvious that St. Paul taught that the body of a Christian is holy and must not be abused. We, therefore, who profess to be Christian medical men, must not forget the high position we occupy as fellow-workers with God. But if we make the mistake of placing our own glorification as the chief purpose of life, and forget to honour God as we should, then our work will be in vain, for God will not bless us. We are specially called upon to be living witnesses for Christ, and to lead "godly, righteous, and sober lives."

    How is it we have nearly all gone astray in our student days, and commenced our professional lives under false ideals? The two words "curriculum" and "examination" are the ruling factors in the life of a modern medical student.

    I spent my first two winters of the medical course in the unsavoury atmosphere of the dissecting room, in which smoking was permitted after one o'clock. Such is the usual environment of the medical student in his early days. Picture the scene, once so familiar! There is a table containing a corpse, with students commencing their dissections; at other tables separate limbs are being dissected. In the morning the demonstrator is always giving instruction, in the afternoon the scene is different. There is general conversation going on among some groups, and demonstrations among others. The results of football matches and

    -2-

    examinations are keenly discussed. In this way our higher instincts are blunted, and we acquire the smoking habit as we learn our anatomy. So we are handicapped in the beginning of our profession, for we retain a "blind spot" in all our future study. That "blind spot" for the evil of narcotism is responsible for the ruin of many men, not only in our profession but in all ranks of life, from the duke to the peasant. If you will pause and consider your responsibility, and seize your opportunity for getting right with God and your neighbour, take your Bible and read through the first chapter of the prophet Isaiah.

    I have tried to describe the true relation of a Christian medical man to the Divine Master, the Great Physician. I will now try to explain the duty of a medical man to the King whp rules over our Empire.

    The medical profession of the United Kingdom consists of an amalgamation of rival Corporations and Colleges, which can give degrees and diplomas. But, strange to say, there is no chief medical officer to speak with authority in the name of the whole profession.

    On reference to the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England, I find the following:

    Article XXXVII.— "Of the Civil Magistrates. The King's Majesty hath the chief power in this Realm of England, and other his Dominions, unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm, whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil, in all causes doth appertain, and is not, nor aught to be, subject to any foreign jurisdiction."

    We may regard our King as the head of the whole profession. Does he not trust to our honour and intelligence, as legally qualified and registered practitioners, to be faithful and diligent teachers of the laws of health in his realms and dominions?

    May I offer my brother practitioners a simple rule for their guidance amidst the perplexities of this modern life. In all questions remember that
    • our first duty is to the Great Physician of souls, the Christ;

    • our second duty is to our King and Country;

    • our third duty is towards our patients and ourselves.

    The whole object of our medical training is to acquire a sound knowledge of the laws of health, that we may help men and women and children, to avoid sickness and disease. The regeneration of humanity from moral, mental, and physical disorder is our appointed task. Our helper will be the Great Physician, who is able

    -3-

    to supply us with power and wisdom to fulfil his work. Our mission is to teach the gospel of hygiene.

    I may claim to have some experience of the effects of tobacco smoking on the human body, having studied the subject in all its bearings for over thirty-eight years. I commenced my medical studies in 1873 at St. George's Hospital Medical School. The habit of smoking tobacco was prevalent among the students, and I had the misfortune to follow the multitude in that respect. I learnt to smoke, and soon I experienced the slavery and fascination of narcotism. I did not give myself up to idleness or pleasure, but I found the habit a serious hindrance in the strenuous life which I had determined to follow. At length I discovered my health was beginning to suffer, and that I must break myself of the habit at all costs. The result was satisfactory; I soon recovered my health and then I began to warn others of the injurious effects of tobacco. It may be truly described as suicide or self-destruction by easy instalments.

    Can such a habit be defended by the members of the learned professions, divinity, law, and medicine? The members of these professions have been specially educated to act as preachers, judges, and medical advisers respectively. Consequently their habits, actions, and words are closely observed and copied by the less learned people. When learned men stoop to folly, it is not surprising that the unlearned follow their example. It is my desire to induce the members of the learned professions to inquire whether they are doing their duty in allowing themselves to indulge in the use of a narcotic (which tobacco is) which has been condemned by wise and good men on religious and scientific grounds. I urge all who wish to enjoy health of mind and body to abstain from all narcotics as tobacco, opium, cocaine, etc., and from the abuse of alcohol.

    The highest aim of medical men is to study the causes of diseases, in the hope of discovering some means for their prevention. We cannot hope to treat any disease successfully until we understand its cause and nature. We are told that property has its responsibility, so also has the possession of expert knowledge. Medical men are trusted as honourable men to warn their patients against all injurious articles of food and drink. Surely

    -4-

    also they should always be prepared to pronounce a verdict as to the use or non-use of tobacco. Unless it can be proved that the habitual use of tobacco for mere sensual gratification is essential to the health, and cannot possibly injure the user, or his wife, or his offspring, we should withhold our consent. That is surely a safe position to assume.

    A medical man is watched by many observing people, because he is looked upon as possessing special knowledge on health matters. His words and actions carry weight. Will he show a true light or a false one? Will he guide the ignorant to avoid tobacco, or will he encourage them in a habit which may lead to disease and death?

    Our profession has done and is still doing a noble work in educating the nation as to the dangers of excessive indulgence in alcoholic beverages. I trust I may persuade my brethren to study the diseases caused by the abuse of tobacco, with equal diligence and impartiality. We must then give the public the benefit of our knowledge. If you come to the concision that it engenders moral, mental, or physical degeneration, you will no doubt be true to the best traditions of medicine and protest on all sides, until you succeed in educating public opinion against the habit.

    I hope every man will do his best to warn innocent boys against cigarettes. The promotion of health and the prevention of disease is a work worthy of Prophets, Priests, and Kings.

    Owing to the recent advances in medical science [Ed. Note: meaning pre-1912 advances], the writings of authors of the last generation are seldom consulted, and are little known to the present generation.

    When I first began to search for medical opinions on the effects of tobacco, I was referred to The Lancet for 1857 (Vol. I.), and I was surprised to read the number of letters written on the subject. The writers engaged in that controversy were not men of one school of thought, but men who had seen practice in all parts of the world, and who had the interests of the human race at heart.

    Surely it is time for a revival of the [1857] Tobacco Controversy [exposing the tobacco hazard]. These [1857] letters prove that many members of the medical profession of the last generation were fully aware of the diseases caused by tobacco, and endeavoured to check the evil by warning the public.

    Many of the writers were men of mark and position in

    -5-

    their day, and their opinions deserve the attention of all earnest students and practitioners. Every generation must learn from the experience of former ones. Though science advance, the human body remains the same sensitive organism through all ages, re-acting to external influences in a similar manner. Nature changes not. As in the beginning, so is nature now. The customs of men may change, but if these are contrary to the laws of nature, they will be attended with evil consequences.

    The civilised inhabitants of Great Britain, Europe, and America have indulged in the use of tobacco for over three hundred years.

    It is high time to enquire if the result of this modern habit is good or bad? Surely wise men will not continue a habit of such a costly nature if they are convinced that it is injurious.

    I cannot regard tobacco as food. No one pretends to classify it under that heading. It is not drink, therefore it seems reasonable to classify it as a medicine or a drug. Therefore, I enquire why healthy men require to take medicine habitually? From my own experience, I am prepared to state that under no circumstances is there any advantage in this country from the smoking or chewing of tobacco. I am also firmly persuaded that the majority of intelligent physicians are of the same opinion.

    No writer on anatomy has yet described a structure in the human body specially created for burning tobacco. It is certainly an abuse of the respiratory passages to apply them to burning tobacco for the purpose of inhaling the smoke so produced. No writer on physiology or therapeutics has even ventured to suggest that any functions of the human body would be better performed under the influence of a narcotic drug. There is no room for doubt as to the harmful nature of tobacco when smoked, chewed, or used as snuff. Therefore, we cannot plead any excuse for such indulgence by ourselves or our patients.

    Every offence against the laws of the Creator invariably meets with some form of suffering or death. Illness often results from imperfect chemical changes (metabolism) in the digestive organs as the result of tobacco toxæmia.

    When a man commences a bad and unnatural habit, he injures not only his own nature, but the natures of those who are dependent on him. The wives and children are

    -6-

    made partakers of the husband's moral, mental, and physical sufferings and diseases. The husband is the head of the wife, both spiritually and socially, and when he dishonours himself, he dishonours his wife, because they have been made "one flesh," so that they re-act on each other—when the man rejoices, the wife rejoices; when the man is gloomy, the woman is gloomy; when the man is honoured, the wife is honoured.

    There is a proverb that "birds of a feather flock together," and it seems to apply to men who smoke, for they seem to flock together and to forsake the society of the gentler sex. Smokers congregate in clubs, public houses, cafés, at race meetings, football matches, etc., forsaking the partners of their joys and sorrows.

    Ed. Note: In 1868, James Parton had said likewise.

    Consequently the single and married women do not enjoy their due share of the society of the stronger and more selfish sex. The men have made a poor exchange, if they have forfeited the love and respect of womankind for the comfort and suffering associated with indulgence in narcotism.

    Is it possible that the tobacco weed has prevented the healing of the nations under the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit? We are living in a Christian country, and we boast of our civilisation, but we groan beneath a burden of unrest, discontent, hysteria, and insanity. We cry aloud to one another for relief, and want to be restored to health, and we appeal to our legislators to find a cure for the ills that afflict us.

    I have come to the conclusion that we have inflicted these ills on ourselves by disregarding the laws of the Creator, who is the lord of our health, and who has appointed physicians for the express purpose of teaching people how to preserve health.

    More than fifty years ago a plain and strong warning was published in the leading medical journal called The Lancet, describing the diseases caused by tobacco smoking.

    Since then the medical profession has carried on an active crusade against the drink curse. In spite of these warnings the drink bill for the United Kingdom reaches the fabulous sum of £160,000,000 each year; while the annual bill for tobacco and smokers' sundries, is over £25,000,000 a year.

    The nation is now groaning under self-bought and self-afflicted plagues which torment them day and night, and from which they see no way of escape. I venture to say that there is a way of escape, and I hope that the

    -7-

    medical professson will undertake to proclaim the same truth. I maintain that the way to restore health and wealth is to teach the people to live temperately and to work together in a spirit of brotherly love to promote national health and prosperity.

    Our aim as medical men should be to purify the homes of England, so that every home may be a sanatorium and a model dwelling-house. We are responsible for the health of 45,000,000 people, including 6,000,000 children in our elementary schools. We must interest ourselves more in guarding these children from the evil effects of cramming. It would be wise to begin with the children, for they need our help most, and we may hope to win over the parents to our principles by showing our love to their children. When they see we are working for the good of their children, we may ultimately gain the confidence of the parents and lead them to be temperate.

    Hygiene is a very wide subject, including the teaching of discipline, self-control, and temperance. We need a clear and precise definition of temperance that will be helpful to teachers in all classes of society. As medical men, we must not be bigoted or fanatical, but we must not suggest compromises with conscience or truth. We cannot go so far as to declare that moderate use of alcoholic beverages is harmful in all cases, therefore we cannot declare they are poisonous and therefore unlawful. We may feel sure that the safer course is to adopt total abstinence as a general rule, both for physiological and financial reasons, but we should not promote the interests of the nation by advocating extreme measures.

    The case of tobacco smoking is on a different footing. Custom in this country has so far limited the indulgence to the men, but now we are threatened with smoking women. We also have seen, with regret, the growth of the habit among boys under ten years of age.

    We have now the advantage of an Act of Parliament to prevent smoking under sixteen years of age. This is not a preventive, but it is a sign that the conscience of the nation can be stirred, and it must be the aim of the whole medical profession never to let the national conscience have ease until the habit of using tobacco becomes a stigma and a disgrace.

    Ed. Note: It was nearly a century later before this finally happened, when the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., DSM-III (1980), was issued, listing smoking as a mental disorder.

    We dare not give any encouragement to the continued indulgence in any drug

    -8-

    habit, and we regard the smoking habit as a form of narcophilia,* which may soon develop into narcomania.

    I will now give my definition of temperance for the guidance of medical reformers and others. Temperance should stand for: moderation in efforts at education and in all forms of school work and study; moderation in eating and drinking, especially the use of tea and alcoholic beverages; finally it should stand for total abstinence from all things which are not lawful, such as tobacco and other narcotic and stimulant drugs. One of the evils which afflict the children of our land is intemperate education.

    Our first duty will be to study the etiology of all diseases, and for this purpose we must visit the homes of our patients frequently, and keep in touch with them all the year round. After a few years experience one will know the constitution of each patient, and in time the practitioner will learn how many diseases are preventable. Each season brings its own dangers. Since the advent of the hot weather I have seen two boys suffering from chill, the result of bathing too long in the sea, and one girl with acute congestion of the liver from exposure to the sun. The basis of etiology is:
    • (1) A knowledge of the stimulants and narcotics our patients indulge in.

    • (2) A knowledge of the school-masters' methods of forcing the brains of children.

    • (3) A knowledge of the school environment.

    • (4) A knowledge of the home environment.

    • (5) A knowledge of the sports indulged in.

    • (6) A knowledge of the occupations of adults.

    • (7) A knowledge of the food and water, and sanitary state of the home and the workshop,

    • (8) A knowledge of the religious environment, whether normal, abnormal, or nil.

    The first essential for a practitioner to become a skilful etiologist is an earnest desire to search for truth, and never to be in a hurry. Every clinical fact should be written down at the time, in fact the note-book should always be
    ____________
    *Narcophilia = loving narcotism — idleness — dreaming.

    -9-

    in the hands ready to take down the sayings of the patient or his friends. The value of such a plan will become obvious to the reader, when he peruses my series of family histories of the non-smokers and smokers on genealogical lines. I venture to state that this method of taking histories will throw more light on the cause of the declining birth-rate than the haphazard method now adopted of collecting statistics of births, deaths and marriages. The utility of the Annual Reports of the Registrar General is seriously diminished, and the value of all statistics is uncertain, owing to the want of a definite nomenclature.

    We all admit the defects in our Public Health Service; in some Directions there is over-lapping of official departments, and in other directions there is under-lapping. All these State officials are useful, but we could spare them better than the under-paid and over-worked army of general practitioners; they still constitute the first line of defence against disease in its earliest stage. If they will become experts in etiology, and teach the value of temperance, they may deliver the Empire from the evils which threaten to destroy her existence. It is important to ascertain the nature and extent of diseases which are inherited, and then to enquire whether the parents were addicted to the use of tobacco, to state the exact amount smoked each week, and the age when the habit commenced.

    When there are a number of skilful etiologists in the profession, an effort should be made to induce the Government to take a census of the United Kingdom, by a staff consisting of medical men who have become specialists in etiology. By this means much valuable and correct information would be acquired as to the direct or indirect causes of tubercule, cancer, insanity, arterial degeneration, chorea, hay-fever, myopia, congenital defects of mind, etc. True progress must be slow at first, for we have to deal with vested interests and British prejudice, and pride and ignorance. But these will yield in due time if we faint not.

    I am confident that if the members of the three learned professions will abandon those habits which hinder their own spiritual and temporal progress, and that of the nation, and adopt habits of temperance, and work in a spirit of brotherly love, teaching the blessings that may be confidently anticipated from national tem-

    -10-

    perance, there will be a rapid decrease in the records of crime, disease, insanity, destitution and suicide.

    I appeal to the members of the three learned professions to form a society for promoting health and temperance in the homes of our Empire. Union gives strength. If you still doubt the need for temperance reform, read the newspapers and note how many Christians in name have become victims of sin and disease through alcohol and tobacco. If you will not become an active reformer, please pray for a blessing on my book.

    Consider the words of St. Paul, which were addressed to the Christian converts who were living in Rome: "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And be not fashioned according to this world: but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God." (Romans xii.1, 2).

    -11-
    CHAPTER II

    THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITY OF THE TOBACCO HABIT.

    GILBERT Burnettt, F.L.S., in his "Outlines of Botany," published 1835, writes,
    "There are about thirty species of nicotiana, and some of these are natives or naturalized in most parts of the world; for, although its use was unknown in Europe before the discovery of America, indulgence in its use is so common, nay universal, among the Chinese, and their forms of bamboo pipes and their methods of inhaling so peculiar, that Pallas and many others have been led to believe that the custom is aboriginal with them, and that they and other nations of the East were acquainted with its use before its introduction into the West. Two or more species, N. Sinensis and N. Fructicasa, are also believed to be natives of China, and N. Nepaulensis, of Hindustan.

    "Chardin states that its use was common in Persia, long before the discovery of America, and that it is a native of that country, or at least was naturalized there as early as 1260. The origin of the word tobacco is doubtful. Like coffee and Peruvian bark, tobacco encountered violent opposition when its half-inebriating and soothing properties recommended it to popular use.

    "Many governments attempted to restrain its consumption by penal edicts. The Sultan Amurath IV. forbade its importation into Turkey, and condemned to death those found guilty of smoking, from a fear that it produced barrenness. The Grand Duke of Moscow prohibited its entrance into his dominions under pain of the knout for the first offence, and death for the next; and in other parts of Russia the practice of smoking was denounced,

    -12-

    and all smokers condemned to have their noses cut off. The Shah of Persia and other sovereigns were equally severe in their enactments; and Pope Urban VIII. anathematized all those who smoked in churches.

    "In 1654 the Council of one of the Swiss cantons cited all smokers before them; every innkeeper was ordered to inform against all those who were found smoking in their houses. But not only legislators, but philosophers, entered into a crusade against tobacco."

    King James I. [1603-1625] had a strong dislike of smoking, and wrote a book to condemn its use. Here follows an extract from his famous "Counterblaste [(London: R. Barker, 1604)],"
    "Surely smoke becomes a kitchen, better than a dining chamber, and yet it makes a kitchen oftentimes in the inward parts of men, soyling and infecting them with an unctuous and oyly kind of soote as hath been found in some great tobacco takers, that after their death were opened [autopsied]."
    The smoking of tobacco has been practised in China, Hindostan, Burmah, and other countries of the East from time immemorial. I do not know whether the powerful nations of Assyria and Persia indulged in the habit, but I am not aware of any evidence being at hand from cylinders or stone carvings. How far it has kept back and helped to degrade different races in days of old, we shall never know.

    Ed. Note: Compare Prof. John Hinds' 1882 analysis.

    In later times when the Greeks and Romans raised their Empires, and cultivated the arts and sciences, they accomplished their grand work without the aid of tobacco. Chivalry, bravery, and religion flourished in England before the introduction of tobacco. It is worth while considering the manner in which the habit of smoking was introduced into this country.

    The tobacco plant is not a native of this country, and was not introduced till the time of Queen Elizabeth [1558-1603]. Sir Walter Ralegh [1552-1618] acquired the habit of smoking tobacco from the natives of North America. He brought the weed to England, and it appears that he recommended it as a remedy for dyspepsia; whether he described it as a panacea for other aches and pains I do not know. Probably he pushed it with all the assurance of a man who wished to derive a good income from it. He laid himself out to obtain a monopoly for its sale, and cultivated it on all his Irish estates. So we learn that people began to smoke tobacco at the advice and on the responsibility of a brave

    -13-

    adventurer and a gay courtier, who had obtained a powerfully poisonous drug that was much used by some of the ignorant savages of North America. The medical profession was in no way responsible for its introduction; it rapidly became a fashionable habit in the court of Queen Elizabeth [1558-1603], and we are told that even the ladies were enticed to draw the fumes into their mouths.

    At Sir Walter's house at Islington he frequently entertained his quests, the only refreshments he offered them being a mug of ale with nutmeg, and a pipe of tobacco. Raleigh became a victim to the charms of Lady Nicotine, and worshipped her to the day of his death. He was ambitious to accumulate wealth, and he turned his attention to the Liquor Trade, and secured from Queen Elizabeth a valuable patent of the monoply of licensing taverns, and retailing wines throughout all England. Thus he combined the business of growing tobacco and retailing wine.

    However, in the next reign he became mixed up with plots against his lawful sovereign King James [1603-1625] and was committed to the Tower. While a prisoner he attempted his life. He enjoyed the society of many learned men who were fellow prisoners. He was the favourite of Queen Elizabeth and was a man of great influence at her court.

    His misfortunes commenced in the court of King James. His later days were full to the brim of sorrow, sickness, and misfortune. When the morning of his execution came, he awaited his fate with calm, Christian fortitude. He poised the axe, felt its edge, and then said with a smile, "This is a sharp medicine, but it will cure all diseases." His estates were forfeited, and his widow left broken-hearted and penniless. Such was the unhappy end of the man who was responsible for starting the habit of smoking in England.

    It is interesting to learn from the writings of [William] Camden [1551-1623], the famous historian, what his opinions were on tobacco smoking. Speaking of the return of the first Colonists from Virginia in 1586, he writes thus:
    "These men that were thus brought back, were the first that, I know of, that brought into England, that Indian plant which they call tobacco and nicotia, which they used against crudities,*
    ____________
    *Crudities = an obsolete term applied to undigested substances in the stomach.

    -14-

    being taught it by the Indians. Certainly from that time forward it began to grow into great request, and to be sold at a high rate, whilst in a short time, many men, everywhere, some for wantonness, some for health sake, with an unsafciable depire and greediness, sucked in the stinking smoke thereof, through an earthen pipe, which presently they blew out again at their nostrils, insomuch that tobacco shops are now as ordinary as taverns and tap-houses."

    From a fair and temperate consideration of the origin of the smoking habit in the time of "good Queen Bess," it is evident that the spirit of scientific inquiry as to the real action and effect of tobacco was absent. Extravagant statements as to the valuable properties of tobacco for the relief of indigestion, probably helped to make it popular. It is also stated that it was considered a cure for syphilis by the American Indians, and that the Spanish sailors who returned to Spain with Columbus, infected with this disease, thoroughly believed it was the only cure for the malady.

    The new habit met with considerable opposition from King James I. He published a strong letter to his people pointing out the poisonous properties of tobacco and calling attention to the numerous diseases resulting therefrom. His warning did not cause the smokers to abandon the habit.

    In the year 1615 the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge found it necessary to proclaim that "No graduate, scholler, or student presume to take tobacco into St. Mary's Church, upon payne of final expellinge the Universitie."

    In 1651 the House of Commons considered the advisability of banishing tobacco from England.

    King Charles I. [1625-1649] was opposed to smoking; and King Charles II. [1660-1685] wrote a letter to the University of Cambridge forbidding the members to wear periwigs, smoke tobacco, or read their sermons

    In the time of James I. [1603-1625] the price of tobacco was 18/- per pound, and was chiefly sold in the shops of apothecaries.

    [Oliver] Cromwell [1653-1658] was an occasional smoker; many of the Puritans indulged in tobacco, and the following rhyme in

    -15-

    "The Wits Recreation, 1660," proves how general smoking was in the Commonwealth period [1649-1660]:

    "Tobacco engages
    Both sexes, all ages,
    The poor, as well as the wealthy,
    From court to the cottage,
    From childhood to dotage,
    Both those that are sick and the healthy.

    It plainly appears,
    That in a few years,
    Tobacco more custom hath gained
    Than sack or than ale,
    Though they double the tale,
    Of the times, wherein they have reigned."

    At the time of the Great Plague [1660's] in London people came to believe that smoking tobacco was a sure preventive against the disease, and so women and even children were encouraged to smoke. In some schools, even at Eton College, the boys had lessons in smoking every morning. It is related that a certain Etonian was soundly whipped for not "smoaking " at his master's bidding.

    It appears that the Quakers made a formal protest against tobacco smoking. Their aversion to it has continued up to the present, because they consider it contrary to the laws of the Creator for his children to depend on a narcotic drug for peace of mind and comfort.

    The habit continued to spread during the reign of William III [1689-1702]. It became so general among the members of the House of Commons that it became necessary to make a rule that no member was to take tobacco into the gallery or to the table sitting at Committees.

    In the time of Queen Anne [1702-1714] the poorer classes had become habitual smokers, the average cost being one penny a day all the year round.

    From the time of Queen Elizabeth [1558-1603] to that of Queen Anne [1702-1714] the smoking of pipes had been considered a sign of gentility and a fashionable accomplishment; but when the habit became general among the poor people, "the quality" became uneasy at the spectacle of the poor man doing the same as the rich, so they forsook their pipes and stopped the smoking, and started a new accomplishment which they learnt from the

    -16-

    French. When tobacco is finely powdered, it is called snuff; the leaders of society began to fill their nostrils with snuff, and to enjoy the new sensation.

    The habits of the upper class were thus described in the year 1711 by some writers in the Spectator:

    "To such a height with these is fashion grown,
    They feed their very nostrils with a spoon."

    Another writer complained of the handing round of the snuff box in church and chapel. It appears that chewing was much in vogue in churches, for he adds, "kneeling in church is prevented by the large amount of tobacco saliva ejected in all directions."

    The smoking of cigars was introduced into England by the military, who had learnt the habit in Spain, during the Peninsular War, while the habit of smoking cigarettes was acquired by our soldiers during the Crimean War.

    In the year 1795, the Wesleyan Conference passed a rule, that "no preacher shall use tobacco for smoking, for chewing or in snuff, unless it be prescribed by a physician." In the year 1877, the Wesleyan Conference refused to rescind this rule. This rule is now ignored. At most of the Conferences smoking rooms are provided.

    The habit of smoking has been indulged in by a large number of the Bishops and Clergy of the Church of England. The only prohibitions of which I have knowledge, are the "Counterblaste" of King James I., and the letter written by King Charles II. to the University of Cambridge. There are many of the Bishops and Clergy who do not smoke, but what a sad example a smoking clergyman sets the world. I presume they acquired the habit at the same time they were attending divinity lectures and did it with the knowledge, if not the sanction, of their tutors and professors.

    I cannot believe it is right for the authorities at our Universities to permit the undergraduates to acquire a habit which lowers the moral nature, and lessens mental energy and bodily vigour. It would be better for a young man to be deprived of the advantages of a University than to run the risk of acquiring one of the worst habits of modern times.

    It is truly a difficult task to rouse this nation to the danger of this habit. Indeed the task is beyond the power of man, singly or in comnbination, but with God, nothing is impossible. Our Lord's orders to His disciples

    -17-

    were simple, "Watch and pray." If we obey as a nation we shall conquer the habit and flourish as a nation, but if the nation continues in disobedience, smoking and slumbering, the nation will suffer.

    About the year 1880, the cigarette became the fashion, and was soon taken up by boys and by foolish women. The evil of juvenile smoking soon became so great as to cause alarm. In the year 1907, the Legislature passed an Act, rendering smoking illegal under the age of sixteen.

    In the year 1909, I made inquiries of "General Booth" as to the regulations in the Salvation Army, and I received the following statement in reply:—

    "Great Britain—  
     Local Officers32,229
     Bandsmen13,904
     Corps Cadets5,088
    "Colonies and Foreign Countries—  
     Local Officers24,457
     Bandsmen7,208
     Corps Cadets5,191

    "All these officers are total abstainers from alcohol and tobacco.

    (Signed), Theodore Kitching, Lieut. Col."

    If General Booth has authority to insist on all his officers and bandsmen being abstainers from alcohol and tobacco, I wonder why the leaders of our own Church of England do not follow his excellent example. I have no doubt that one of the reasons of the energy and zeal of the Salvation Army is the power they receive from the Holy Spirit which dwells only in temples which are sweet and holy. The activities and philanthropic works of the Salvation Army are the admiration of Christendom. There is no depressing narcotic in their blood to cause languor and hebetude. Their minds are clear, their nerves are steady, because they lead natural lives. Many smokers have set up pharyngeal and laryngeal catarrh and loss of power of singing and reading through the irritation of smoke on the mucous membranes.

    -18-
    CHAPTER III.

    A LIST OF THE NAMES OF THE MEDICAL MEN WHO
    CONTRIBUTED LETTERS TO The Lancet, TO BE FOUND
    IN VOL. I., 1857, CONDEMNING THE USE OF TOBACCO.

    (1) Samuel Solly, F.R.S., Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital, London.

    (2) David Johnson, M.R.C.S., Dudley

    (3) J. Pidduck, M.D., London.

    (4) W. Pugh, M.D.

    (5) Maurice Evans, M.R.C.S.

    (6) W. Cortis, M.R.C.S., Filey.

    (7) J. Ronald Martin, F.R.S., London.

    (8) J. Higginbottom, F.R.S., Nottingham.

    (9) S. Booth, L.S.A., Huddersfield.

    (10) W. McDonald.

    (11) C. B. Garrett, M.D., Hastings.

    (12) G. Butler, M.R.C.S.

    (13) Dr. Schneider.

    I regard the letters written by the above-named gentlemen as worth reading, for they contain an amount of clinical knowledge on the evils of tobacco never before collected and brought to a focus. The whole controversy is too long to be included in my book, but I may state there is not one opinion or one fact which is not true. I will content myself by quoting the following:

    Letter from an Oxford graduate to the editor of The Lancet:

    "Sir,—I have perused with great interest the tobacco controversy that has lately been carried on in your pages. Permit me, as an Oxford man, to bear witness to the

    -19-


    bad effects of 'the weed and the pipe.' As far as my experience goes, it is my opinion that nine out of ten first-class men are non-smokers, or, at least, smoke so little as not to deserve the name of smokers. Again, its weakening effects are borne witness to by the fact that men in training for boat races are strictly prohibited tobacco.

    "When, sir, I see the pale and sallow faces of habitual smokers; when hear them deplore the habit (or rather the necessity); when I hear them confess that they are unable to begin their day's work without a pipe (or, at least, they would be miserable without the indulgence); when I see our College servants aping their masters, and thinking it fine to be seen with a villainous cigar or 'short clay' in their mouths; when I see the boys of Oxford (and even the little white-robed choristers of our College chapel) taking up the odious habit, making their little faces thin and pale, and running their constitutions; when I see all this, what conclusion can I come to but that tobacco is an evil—a tremendous evil; that Sir Walter Ralegh has been a curse to his country; that to him the sickly faces, stunted forms, and shortened lives of so many of our once sturdy countrymen, are in a great degree owing."

    Extract from Editor's Article in The Lancet, [4 April] 1857:

    "To the young man, and more especially to the medical student, in whom we are peculiarly interested, we would say: Shun the habit of smoking as you would shun self-destruction. As you value your physical and moral well-being, avoid a habit, which for you can offer no advantage to compare with the dangers you incur by using it. The bright hopefulness of youth, its undaunted aspirations, and its ardent impulses, require no halo of smoke though which to look forward upon the approaching struggle of life. Your manner of living must be bad indeed if you require anything further than sleep, exercise, and diet, to fit you for your duties as students. Your minds must be emasculated indeed, and arrant cowards must you be, totally unfit for the stern realities of what is to come, if you cannot face your present few and comparatively small anxieties, without having recourse to the daily use of narcotics. We speak from a large experience of medical students, when we say that the intemperate smoker is the intemperate indulger, as a general rule, in all that partakes of the nature of sensual gratification. It matters not that

    -20-


    many may, and do, pass through the ordeal unscathed. Vast numbers do not. Listless minds and languid bodies, slakeless thirst and shaking hands, delirium tremens, madness, and death, we have distinctly and surely seen to follow the unhallowed indulgence in youths who began their studies with bright promise of success, with fair characters, and honest purposes. It is not open to impressible and wavering youths to say, 'Thus far will I go, and no further.'

    "To commence the downward course is too easy—to retrace the false step is too difficult; the risk is too great, the advantage too infinitesimally small, the interests at stake too supremely important, to allow the student once to begin. It is no sign of manliness to toy with danger, and sport upon the brink of a precipice. The impulse which may plunge the unreflecting boy into ruin may come, he knows not when, nor with how great force; let him prove his strength by avoiding, not by courting, danger.

    "Let us enquire further, whether the physiological effects produced in the course of smoking afford any indications to what constitutes excess. Profuse salvation can hardly be compatible with the idea of moderation. Perpetual irritation of a mucous membrane can hardly be kept up with impunity. A large proportion of smokers must be aware that heartburn, eructations and apepsia surely follow one or two pipes, or one or two cigars, beyond the wonted allowance. The same excess is certainly followed by loss of appetite, and especially by loss of morning relish of food. Let the pulse be watched. Does it not decline in frequency below the normal standard, and is it not irregular after a very slight excess? Do not palpitation and prœcordial anxiety much oftener annoy the habitual smoker than he would exactly like to confess? Is not the inclination to seek the recumbent posture, or to respire cold air, of frequent occurrence, when the smoker would hardly like to own it? Do not giddiness, dimness of vision, tremors, nausea, clammy perspirations, and tinnitus aurium frequently occur in the course of a long smoke? And do not each and all of these effects clearly and irrefragably establish excess in every case? We affirm most unhesitatingly that, setting aside idiosyncrasies, there is hardly an habitual smoker to excess who cannot be

    -21-

    condemned by the most casual observation of his bodily functions. And the further we move upwards in the social gamut, the more striking will be the physiological evidences of excess in every individual case.

    "It is almost unnecessary to make a separate inquiry into the pathological conditions which follow upon excessive smoking. They have been referred to by the way. Moreover, abundant evidence has been adduced in the correspondence in our columns of the gigantic evils which attend the abuse of tobacco. Let it be granted at once that there is such a thing as moderate smoking, and let it be admitted that we cannot accuse tobacco of being guilty of the whole of Cullen's "Nosology," it still remains that there is a long catalogue of frightful penalties attached to its abuse.

    "Let us briefly recapitulate:

      "(1) To smoke early in the day is excess.

      "(2) As people are generally constituted, to smoke more than one or two pipes of tobacco, or one or two cigars daily is excess.

      "(3) Youthful indulgence in smoking is excess.

      "(4) There are physiological indications which, occurring in any individual case, are criteria of excess.

    "We most earnestly desire to see the habit of smoking diminished, and we entreat the youth of this country to abandon it altogether. Let them to give up a dubious pleasure for a certain good. Ten years hence we shall receive their thanks."

    Ed Note: This 1857 definition of excess smoking = abolishment of smoking by 1867.
    Tobacco pushers are cited as killing about a thousand of their best customers every day. Tobacco pushing thus cannot continue unless, daily, new youths are hooked. This is what the FDA found to be so.
    Tobacco craving does not allow for the non-excess criteria, e.g., no morning smoking, hence typically most all smokers smoke to excess. See the 99½% data.

    ARGUMENTS OF A DEFENDER OF TOBACCO,
    AND THE ANSWER THERETO.

    A defender of the use of tobacco, a member of the medical profession, wrote to The Lancet, 17 January, 1857, as follows:

    "The fact of smoking being almost universal, appears alone to indicate that there can be no very great harm in it; and so long as thousands and thousands by their acts and its results prove to me that smoking is not injurious, so long shall I despise all theories and statements to the contrary."

    In answer to this remark, a letter appeared in The Lancet, January 31, 1857, by Dr. D. Johnson, as follows:

    -22-

    "The absurdity of this argument for this worse than useless practice, appears evident from the following similar examples of reasoning. Opium eating is very prevalent in some other countries, intemperance in others; ergo, there can be no very great harm resulting from them. It is, in my judgment, anything but an evidence of wisdom, to argue the harmlessness of any practice on the ground of its universality."

    Further on, Dr. Johnson wrote:

    "It seems very difficult for any man to go through this world with his eyes open, without perceiving thousands of persons who are suffering physically, mentally and morally, through indulgence in this obnoxious habit. What then is the testimony of facts on the subject of smoking? Why, for one inveterate smoker who will bear testimony favourable to the practice, ninety-nine such of the candid of these, are found to declare their belief, that this practice is injurious; and I scarcely ever met one habitual smoker, who did not in his candid moments, regret his commencement of the practice. It is a certain fact, that devoted smokers are liable both to constitutional and local disorders, of very serious characters. Among the former we notice giddiness, sickness, vomiting, dyspepsia, diarrhœa, angina pectoris; diseases of the liver, pancreas, and heart, nervousness, amaurosis, paralysis, apoplexy, atrophy, deafness, and mania.

    "Most of these results I have selected from authors of some locus standi, amongst whom I may mention Doctors Prout, Brigat, Laycock, Radcliffe, Ranking, Pereira, Orfeila, Trousseau, Johnstone, Sir Benjamin Brodie, and Professor Lizars."

    Dr. Taylor in his valuable work on poisons, says,

    "That a poisonous substance like tobacco, whether in powder, juice, or vapour cannot be brought in obntact with an absorbing surface like mucous membrane without in many cases producing disorder of the system, which the consumer is probable quite ready to attribute to any other cause than that which could render it necessary for him to deprive himself of what he considers not merely a luxury, but an article actually necessary for his existence.

    "The quantity of this poisonous weed entered for 'home consumption,' in the eleven months ending November 1856, was 29,776,082 pounds. The deleterious

    -23-

    effects which this enormous amount of tobacco produced upon its victims, both physically, mentally and morally, admits of no possible calculation."

    Dr. Schneider wrote as follows to The Lancet, January 31, 1857:

    "Sir,—Having had much experience of the baneful effects of smoking in my own country, Germany, which may be considered 'the great tobacco furnace of the age,' which is affected by her reeking atmosphere in many ways. I trust that my opinion may have some weight with your readers.

    "The tendency of Germans to diseases of the lungs may be traced to their incredible passion for smoking, and our principal medical men and physiologists compute that out of twenty deaths of men between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, ten originate in the waste of the constitution by smoking.

    "So frequently is vision impaired by the constant use of tobacco, that spectacles may be said, to be a part and parcel of a German, as a hat is to an Englishman.

    "In America, likewise, where my practice has extended, I have noted the same pernicious effects, and it is a well attested fact that the Americans wear themselves out by the use of tobacco."

    -24-

    CHAPTER IV.

    ON "THE USE AND ABUSE OF TOBACCO,"
    BY WM. MARSDEN, M.D., LIVING IN QUEBEC IN 1860,
    FELLOW OF THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.

    "I WAS asked a few days since by one of our ablest surgeons and most distinguished physicians, whether I had remarked the decided increase in the number of deaths from diseases of the brain since my coming into practice. Having admitted the proposition, my friend whose shrewdness and quickness of perception is characteristic, was disposed to assign as the principal cause the character and quality of the spirituous liquors so largely indulged in by all classes. My own experience and opinion, however, turn to another cause—the excessive use of tobacco, and had I not since laid my hand on Dr. Lizar's invaluable book, my own observation in the course of a long and extensive practice would have furnished me with proofs innumerable.

    "For several years past the discussion of what has been called the 'tobacco question' has engaged the attention of medical, as well as non-medical writers in Great Britain, and my quondam fellow-student, Mr. Solly, now a surgeon of St. Thomas's Hospital, London, has taken a prominent part in the discussion, and although the evils of excessive smoking prevail as extensively in Quebec, as in Great Britain, the medical profession to which the public looks as the rational exponent of sound principles in relation to man's health and physical habits, has hitherto been almost silent on the subject. If any medical man feels that by simply raising his voice he may

    -25-

    be the means of saving the life, or preserving the health of a single fellow being, who may he unconsciously shortening his days by indulging in what he calls an innocent pastime and luxury, he is culpably negligent if he remains silent.

    "'The profession,' says Mr. Solly, 'have no idea of the ignorance of the public regarding the nature of tobacco. Even intelligent, well educated men stare in astonishment when you tell them tobacco is one of the most powerful poisons we possess. Now is this right? Has the medical profession done its duty? Ought we not, as a body, to have told the public that of all our poisons, it is the most insidious, uncertain, and in full doses the most deadly?'

    "Dr. Lizars enumerates the constitutional effects of tobacco by stating that they are 'numerous and varied, consisting of giddiness, sickness, vomiting, dyspepsia, vitiated taste of the mouth, loose bowels, diseased liver, congestion of the brain, apoplexy, palsy, mania, loss of memory, amaurosis, deafness, nervousness, emasculation, and cowardice.'

    "Frightful as is this list of ills, I can from my own experience endorse its accuracy, and yet how large a number of our own profession are addicted to the vice, and how fatal must be the effect of their example upon the unthinking.

    "Professor Laycock, of Edinburgh University, says in a most temperate paper in the Medical Gazette, October 2, 1846: 'I have known many instances in which I was unable to prove that the ordinary use of tobacco did any harm; I have known many more in which I could prove that it did do harm; and I have not known any good from it that might not have been obtained by other less objectionable means.'

    "I will only make a few more extracts from Dr. Lizar's paper, in order to support the view I have enunciated that tobacco is the fruitful source of paralytic affections:

    "'Congestion of the brain, which is a frequent precursor of palsy, occurs almost only in those much addicted to smoking, in whom a cigar is never out of the mouth. It is denoted by headache, want of sleep, or rather restless nights, and occasionally flushing of the countenance. Apoplexy has been noticed by several authors supervening the smoking of tobacco, also the immoderate use of snuff.

    -26-

    The form of palsy produced by excessive smoking is almost always hemiplegia, and is usually incurable. Mania is a fearful result of the excessive use of tobacco, two cases of which I have witnessed. I have also to mention that a gentleman called on me and thanked me for my observations on tobacco, and related to me with deep emotion what had occurred in his own family from smoking tobacco. Two amiable younger brothers had gone deranged and committed suicide.'

    "'I lately visited a gentleman in a lunatic asylum,' says Dr. Lizars, 'labouring under general paralysis, and his mind becoming idiotic. On corresponding with his former medical attendant, I understand his habits were temperate as regarded drink, but he worked hard in a mercantile house and smoked to excess.'

    "Dr. Webster cites among the causes of mental diseases the great use of tobacco, and he supports this opinion by a reference to the statistics of insanity in Germany.

    "'Loss of memory,' says Dr. Lizars, 'takes place in an extraordinary degree in the smoker, much more so than in the drunkard.'

    "A valued and talented medical friend, whose pipe is scarcely out of his mouth when at leisure, is an instance of the foregoing condition, and who, besides, suffers from fearful neuralgic attacks of the head; but alas! I have failed to convince him that tobacco is in any way the cause. To all who have suffered or may be suffering under the pernicious influences of tobacco, I cannot give any more useful or proper advice than is contained in the stereotyped phrase of Dr. Lizars, in the treatment of the different species of disease, induced by the use of tobacco, 'Throw away tobacco for ever.'

    "(Signed) W. Marsden."

    I think it should greatly aid me in my task, if I here insert an extract from "Essays by the late Sir Morell Mackenzie, M.D.," etc. The MSS. came to the hands of his brother, by whom they were published in 1898.

    There can be no doubt but that the professional opinions of that eminent throat specialist must have very great weight in the minds of my readers, especially so if they will consider the fact, that although Sir Morell was a smoker, yet, in his "Essay on Tobacco," with the whole force of his professional talent, he gave his unbiased opinion to the world, as to the detrimental effects of the

    -27-

    tobacco habit. Surely these opinions are worth credence, and must inevitably carry conviction to all reasonable minds.

    Sir Morell Mackenzie wrote thus:

    Medical men, who have eyes for such things, can see the baneful effects of immoderate smoking writ large on nearly every part of the mucous membrane of the throat. It is often the abuse of tobacco that is at the bottom of chronic congestion or other deviations from the normal condition of the throat which are put down to other causes.

    "The effects of tobacco on the body are both general and local; it acts on the nervous centres and on the heart, as well as on the parts with which the smoke or the juice comes immediately in contact. It usually finds expression in what is vaguely called 'nervousness,' the pulse becomes flurried, and the muscles more or less relaxed and unsteady: this is why smoking is so strictly forbidden to men training for athletic feats.

    "An occasional pipe or cigar would probably not be hurtful, but trainers are unanimous in forbidding tobacco in any form. The cause of their attitude in this matter is, no doubt, the fear that moderation might lead to excess, and convinced as I am of the deplorable effects of over-indulgence in smoking on steadiness and precision of muscular movement, I cannot say that I feel surprised at the apprehension of trainers.

    "So marked is the effect of tobacco in relaxing the whole of the muscular system, that before the days of chloroform it was employed in surgical operation, in which it was necessary that the muscles should be perfectly limp.

    "It will thus be readily understood that under the influence of a drug possessing these properties, the delicate adjustments of the complicated vocal machinery are to some extent disordered, and the voice is out of tune and harsh.

    "Something analagous to what takes place in the eye as the result of the abuse of tobacco occurs in the larynx, or in the part of the brain which governs the movement of that organ. Oculists are familiar with "tobacco amblyopia," that is, dimness of sight, due to what may be called figuratively, blurring of the retina by tobacco smoke.

    "The tongue often suffers severely from the effects of tobacco. Small excoriations, blisters, superficial inflammation, and white patches are formed on the surface of the organ, and a permanently unhealthy condition is

    -28-

    induced, which in those predisposed to cancer is apt, under the influence of advancing age, or as the result of prlonged vocal irritation, to lead to the development of that disease.

    "The same observation applies to the superficial ulceration which affects the sides of the root of the tongue. In this situation there are a number of delicate projections, or so-called "papillœ," the exquisitely fine points of which readily become inflamed when exposed to irritation. It is in this situation that cancer of the tongue is exceedingly apt to commence.

    "Smoking at times causes chronic inflammation of the lips, which gives rise to cracks which are always very troublesome, and not infrequently end in deadly disease.

    "The effects of smoking on the throat, when the habit has not been too long indulged in, can as a rule be easily cured by the simple remedy of discontinuing the practice which engenders them. In considering the evils produced by smoking, it should be borne in mind that there are two bad qualities in the fumes of tobacco: the one is the poisonous nicotine, and the other is the high temperature of the burning tobacco. The Oriental hookah, in which the smoke is cooled by being passed through water before reaching the mouth, is probably the least harmful form of indulgence in tobacco; and the cigarette, which is so much in vogue now-a-days, is most certainly the worst. It owes this 'bad eminence' to the very mildness of its action, people being tempted to smoke all day long, and easily accustoming themselves to inhale the fumes into their lungs, and thus saturating their lungs with poison.

    "If smoking is indulged in to excess the habit is always injurious, and I am sure that a great many persons either cannot see, or wilfully shut their eys to, the 'scientific frontier' which separates moderation from abuse.

    "To conclude with a little practical advice: Let him who wishes to keep in the 'perfect way' refrain from inhaling smoke, and take it as an axiom, that the man in whom tobacco increases the flow of saliva to any marked degree is not intended by nature to smoke."

    Ed. Note: Related practical actions are: an Iowa-type cigarette manufacturing ban, and prosecuting pushers for the deaths they have caused.

    The Opinions of A Parsee

    Smoking," he says, "juvenile or adult, is to be condemned from a worldly as well as a medical point of

    -29-

    view. One of the smallest and yet most prosperous nations in the world, the Bombay merchants—the Parsees—who number no more than a hundred thousand, is forbidden by its religion to smoke; and as a result, it stands at the head of the myriad races and castes and creeds of India, all of them addicted to the luxuries of the smoking habit; and it can claim to have a higher percentage of clever men than any other nation."

    HOW TO CHECK JUVENILE SMOKING.

    Employers of youths, doctors and teachers, should unite in opposing cigarette smoking among youths. Many expensive blunders in business may be traced to a tobacco brain-fagged clerk. In a great school the head-master asks every boy on leaving to sign, if he will, a promise not to touch tobacco or alcohol till he is twenty-one. It is not surprising that the school has a fine record for successful pupils, seeing that the majority of boys have signed.

    A DISSERTATION ON THE USE AND ABUSE OF TOBACCO,
    BY ADAM CLARKE.

    "To those who are not yet incorporated in the fashionable company of tobacco smokers I would say: Never enter.

    "To those who are entered I would say: Desist.
    • First, for the sake of your health, which must be seriously affected by it.

    • Secondly, for the sake of your property, which, if you are a poor man, must be seriously impaired by it.

    • Thirdly, for the sake of your time.

    • Fourthly, for the sake of your friends who may be annoyed.

    • Fifthly, for the sake of your voice, which will be ruined by smoke.

    • Sixthly, for the sake of your memory, that it may be clear and retentive to the end.

    • Lastly, for the sake of your soul. Do you not think that God will visit you for your waste of your talents, your time and your money, and needless self-indulgence?

    "Have you not seen that the use of tobacco leads to drunkenness?"

    -30-

    CHAPTER V.

    REMARKS ON The Lancet TOBACCO CONTROVERSY OF 1857,
    BY THE AUTHOR.

    IT must not be supposed that those medical men who enjoyed the charms of "Lady Nicotine" were not greatly excited when their habit was assailed. Many letters were written to justify the uses of tobacco and praise its virtues, but no facts were mentioned to prove its benefit, and therefore I refrain from reproducing the letters.

    The views of the Editor of The Lancet were expressed in a diplomatic spirit; he did not deny the terrible evils of excessive smoking, and he wisely urged all youths under twenty-one years to abstain entirely. His advice to all confirmed smokers to be strictly moderate, seems to show that he either under estimated the seducing power of tobacco to make slaves of its votaries, or he over estimated the self-control of the ordinary smoker.

    It is morally wrong, in my opinion, to recommend a bad habit even in moderation. Give the devil an inch and he will take a mile.

    I think the former Editor would be grieved and alarmed for the future of the British race if he were alive now, and witnessed the crowded smoking carriages on the railways, full of men on their way to business, commencing the day by filling their lungs with poisonhabit which can do no good and may do much harm, and which certainly is a self imposed tax.

    It is true that many great thinkers and writers have praised tobacco at some time while they were

    -31-

    under the influence of its soothing effects, but could we only hear their final verdict daring the declining years of life, it might be different.

    The medical profession has a great responsibility, and if we fail as a body to realize the evil effects of the tobacco habit, we shall be unworthy of the confidence of the public. I can quite endorse Mr. Solly's statement of the widespread ignorance of the public as to the poisonous nature of tobacco.

    Is it not possible for the medical officers in the Army and Navy to take steps to check this evil? How can we expect to preserve health, while the springs of life are poisoned by tobacco? We know that professional athletes and others always abstain from tobacco when in training; should not our soldiers and sailors take the same care of their health? Is it not their duty, as defenders of their country, to be always fit and ready for any emergency?

    Many critics will doubtless argue that the opponents of tobacco have described only the evil effects of excessive smoking, and they will perhaps try to prove that smoking in moderation is harmless and perhaps beneficial in a medical or therapeutic sense. If tobacco is of use in the treatment of disease, it is strange that no place is found for it in the British Pharmacopœia. Is there any evidence to prove that smoking in moderation is beneficial to a healthy man? It seems absurd to suggest that a healthy man can require a moderate dose of narcotic poison every day to quieten and soothe his nerves.

    I think I know enough of human nature to realise that young men, when they begin to smoke, do not inquire as to the action of tobacco smoking on the mind and body, but are only influenced by a desire to do as their elders, because it is considered a sign of manliness by boys. I sympathise with boys in their desire to be manly, but I regret that they should have such a false idea of manliness.

    I do not deny there are many moderate smokers [Ed. Note: ½%], but I am convinced there are far more immoderate smokers [Ed. Note: 99½%], while the transition from the one class to t/he other goes on constantly and imperceptibly. A man who boasts that he is a moderate smoker, and says he does not injure his mind or body, is a [Ed. Note: universal malice] danger to society, because his example is likely to be followed by young lads who may become slaves to the habit and shorten their days thereby. I admit it is

    -32-

    possible for a man who possesses a strong will to limit himself to one pipe or cigar a day, and not to know that his organism is injuriously affected thereby; but my opinion, as a medical man, is that it is extremely unwise and hazardous to indulge in a narcotic poison even in strict moderation. I ask if it is right to allow the rising generation to acquire a habit that may do infinite harm to mind and body and cannot possibly do any good.

    I remember once noticing a friend of mine smoking a large wooden pipe with the word "hebetude" carved on the bowl. I asked him the meaning of the word. He smiled, and told me his father had frequently told him that he would smoke himself into a state of "hebetude," but he offered me no explanation of the meaning of the word. His father's words were true. My friend continued to smoke heavily all his life, and became incapable of active bodily exercise; he was abstemious in alcohol, but I verily believe his whole system was always saturated with nicotine. He died recently in the prime of life after a short illness.


    I must now explain the meaning of the word "hebetude," it is a noun meaning dulness or stupidity; it is derived from the Latin word,

    "Hebeto," I make blunt or dull; I dim, deaden, or weaken.

    There is also the verb,

    "Hebeo," I am blunt or dull, sluggish, inactive, not lively, lounge about.

    The English language derives the following words from the Latin:

  • "Hebetate," to blunt, stupefy; as, to hebetate the intellectual faculties.

  • "Hebetation," the act of rendering blunt, dull or stupid.

  • "Hebetude," meaning dulness, stupidity.

    Does not this word describe accurately the state of mind produced by excessive smoking?

    Am I correct in my opinion that a part of the British nation is silently, heedlessly, blindly, drifting into a state of hebetude, idleness and decrepitude? Am I correct in thinking that the propheac words of Mr. Solly, which he wrote fifty years ago, have proved true? "I believe, if

    -33-

    the habit of smoking in England advances as it has done in the last ten or twelve years, that the English character will lose that combintion of energy and solidity which has hitherto distinguished it, and that England will sink in the scale of nations."

    Ed. Note: As per what happened to other tobacco-dominated nations.

    Mr. Solly was an eminent surgeon in his day, and a Fellow of the Royal Society. He could not shut his eyes to the evil effects of the tobacco habit, and he tried to influence his professional brothers to speak the truth as far as they could of the different diseases resulting from smoking.
    Ed. Note: Books by Dr. Samuel Solly
    The Human Brain: Its Configuration, Structure, Development, and Physiology (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman, 1836)
    The Human Brain: Its Structure, Physiology and Diseases, With a Description of the Typical Forms of Brain in the Animal Kingdom (London, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1847)
    The Human Brain: Its Structure, Physiology and Diseases, With a Description of the Typical Forms of Brain in the Animal Kingdom (Philadelphia, Lea and Blanchard, 1848)
    The Human Brain: Its Structure, Physiology and Diseases, With a Description of the Typical Forms of Brain in the Animal Kingdom. From the 2d London ed. (Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard, 1848)
    Surgical Experiences, The Substance of Clinical Lectures (London, Hardwicke, 1865)

    His efforts were successful in rousing great interest, and a vast amount of reliable evidence was recorded in the pages of The Lancet. The fact that these letters were written fifty years ago does not detract from their value. They bear the stamp of careful enquiry and sincerity, and are the experience of men who practised medicine in different parts of our empire. Many of them had been smokers and experienced in themselves unpleasant symptoms, hence they wisely gave it up. When they emerged from darkness into light, they hastened to spread the truth, to prevent others groping in darkness.

    I still rejoice at my own liberation from the delusion that tobacco is a panacea for all the ills of life. I am convinced that smoking is a hindrance to the full enjoyment and exercise of the faculties of mind and body. What is the verdict of many an honest smoker? I have heard many smokers express deep regret at being slaves to the habit, confessing its uselessness and its expense, and other drawbacks.

    Tobacco tends to make the bread-winner dull of intellect, disinclined for hard work, feeble of digestion, short-winded, short-sighted, dry in the throat, and often thirsting for intoxicating drink. So the unfortunate man has to supply his craving for tobacco and drink before he satisfy the claim of his wife and children. The wife and children are deprived of necessary food and clothing and become feeble and debilitated, if not actually victims to disease. We cannot eradicate disease entirely, but we acknowledge that a great many diseases are preventable, and certainly those which are induced by tobacco and alcohol are preventable

    The medical profession has, at last, roused itself to warn the public about the dangers of excessive drinking, and at last it recognises that the value of alcohol as medicine

    -34-

    has been greatly over-rated—the cause of truth advances slowly in our country, because we are so disinclined to think for ourselves and to break through old customs. Is it not our duty to help the rising generation to grow up strong and healthy and free from narcotic taint? Is not hygiene a neglected science amongst the rich and poor? Books on hygiene do not recommend the use of tobacco even in moderation.

    The evils of tobacco inebriety are truthfully described by Dr. Crothers in his work on "Morphinism and Narcomanias from other Drugs," published by Saunders & Co., London, 1902, he writes thus: "The tobacco addiction is usually associated with alcohol or other drugs, hence the tobacco disability is seldom considered. In reality, tobacco is a narcotic poison, and its use is not only dangerous, but it is certain to be followed with debility, mental perversion and exhaustion. Statistics show that students and brain workers who use tobacco have less vigour, both mental and physical, and are more liable to disease."

    I maintain that the education of a medical man is not complete if he fails to realize the harm of smoking. The subject should be taught in all medical schools as a part of the curriculum. It is unreasonable to expect greater knowledge among the laity than medical men. We must lead the way, teach the truth, and show our consistency by acting up to our knowledge. Who can deny the truth of the evidence contained in the pages of The Lancet which I have quoted? The fact that a few men can smoke without harmful consequences, does not prove that it is beneficial to them. No man is justified in playing with poison. I am convinced that the smoker has less resisting power to disease than others.

    My opinion is corroborated by the results of the experiments of [zoologist and bacteriologist Élie] Metchnikoff [1845-1916], who has discovered that the white corpuscles of the blood, which he calls phagocytes, eat up intrusive bacteria and other germs, and are the chief means in warding off disease; so that the man or animal who has the normal quantity of healthy active phagocytes is immune, that is to say, he cannot be effectively attacked by disease germs.

    Metchnikoff's conclusion is that the phagocytes in our bodies should be stimulated in their activity, in order to

    -35-

    successfully fight the germs of infection. He states that alcohol, opium, and quinine hinder the phagocytic action. He does not refer to tobacco, as far as I know, but he declares that opium hinders the activity of the phagocytes (vide Address by Professor Ray Lankester, at the meeting of the British Association, reported in the British Medical Journal of August 11, 1906). For all we know to the contrary, tobacco may be extremely fatal to them. We depend for immunity, from the attacks of disease germs, on the efficiency of our phagocytes; they form the first line of defence, therefore it is the height of folly, and almost suicdal, to impair their efficiency.

    What about the old belief that smoking was a safeguard against infection? It was based on a want of knowledge, and it was a capital excuse for those who liked tobacco. The light of scientific investigation has come to our help, and clearly indicates the dangers of tobacco and other narcotics in rendering the phagocytes inefficient for their physiological functions. We owe a debt of gratitude to Metchnikoff for his discoveries. There is now no excuse for using tobacco, except for simple indulgence, as a form of mental intoxication. Whether it is dear at the price is a matter of opinion. Chacun à son goût.

    This consideration opens up an important question for medical officers in the Army and Navy. Ought they not to avoid smoking, and teach their men to do the same? It is a serious question and demands instant attention.

    We want an efficient army and navy to protect our country, our colonies, our Indian empire and our commerce.

    We need efficient, clear-headed, far-seeing statesmen and legislators to govern wisely.

    We need ministers of religion to set an example of the Christian life, aind to show us the advantage of leading a "godly, righteous, and sober life."

    We need medical men who will live up to the spirit of the ancient Hippocrates, and warn their patients against "anything harmful and mischievous."

    We need parents and teachers to persuade boys, girls, young men and women to avoid the smoking mania.

    We need a long pull, a strong pull, and a pull all together, to save the rising generation from falling victims to a big snare and delusion.

    Does smoking promote frivolity of mind? I think no

    -36-

    one will deny that the present generation is frivolous. It may appear absurd to connect this phase of character with tobacco, but I know from my personal experience that my own character underwent an extraordinary change under the influence of tobacco. I account for it in this way:

    one of the known effects of tobacco is to
    cause forgetfulness
    , especially of higher things.

    A dreamy reverie takes the place of manly activity. The discipline and simplicity of early days is forgotten in the clouds of tobacco, and the man who was once in serious earnest in his work may become frivolous, capricious and lethargic.

    Look at the countries of Europe now, mostly absorbed in frivolous amusements, and doing little to help the oppressed, or to relieve the sufferings of humanity. The whole body is sick, but the frivolous take no heed. "Let us eat and drink and smoke and enjoy ourselves" is the guiding principle of the multitude. Frivolity must be considered a disease of the mind.

    We want healthy minds and bodies, and I ask how can one reasonably expect to be strong, vigorous, and contented who perpetually imbibe a narcotic poison which stupifies the brain? I am quite certain that smoking does cause forgetfulness and stupidity, and I am of opinion that many serious accidents are the result of temporary oblivion, the immediate result of narcotic poison.

    Seeing that tobacco obscures the reason and the intellectual powers, it may be answerable for the want of chivalry, and the want of religion, which we deplore among the Christian nations of Europe and America. It is obvious that forgetfulness is a common result of smoking. I notice it every day of my life. The young men who are smokers are most forgetful, even in the ordinary affairs of business. Many notes of warning have been recently uttered by thoughtful men of various schools, but the people heed them not. The only remedy is to teach the rising generation to abstain from tobacco.

    PERSONAL EXPERIENCES

    I dread touching on this subject, for I consider that the day when I began to smoke was the most unfortunate day in my whole life. I have often testified to the injurious effect it had on me, morally, mentally and physically. I

    -37-

    broke myself of the habit finally, with great difficulty, many years ago, and I would not take it up again if I were offered untold wealth to do so.

    I decline to describe the sufferings I endured, and the painful struggles of conscience; it is enough for me to say that I am fully convinced that tobacco can become a quencher of the Holy Spirit in a man. I may mention one of the ill effects I experienced from tobacco, viz., occasional loss of sleep after smoking a cigar; only those who have been deprived of a good night's sleep can appreciate its value. Natural sleep is the most precious medicine Nature can give. Art can supply no substitute. This proves that tobacco has a disturbing or exciting action on the brain, resulting from the weak action of the heart, and not to the direct action of tobacco on the nerve cells of the brain.

    Insomnia is one of the evils of the day, and is often the result of excessive brain work and anxiety. Can tobacco be recommended as an antidote for a weary, overworked brain? My prescription would be—rest, and food, and fresh air, together with entire abstinence from alcohol and tobacco.

    How does tobacco affect a married man in his home? Under the influence of tobacco he becomes lazy, and disinclined for any exertion. He is tempted to shirk many little domestic duties which he might perform, but he hopes his wife will save him all trouble and let him enjoy his reverie. He is no comfort to his wife, and she gets little sympathy from him. Her life becomes one long dreary never-ending task; if sickness attacks the children, all the responsibility is thrust on her shoulders; if the husband is out of work, the wife must go out as a charwoman to provide bread for the husband and children. The willing horse does all the work, but she must be a strong woman if her health will stand such a heavy strain. I think this is no exceptional case: I see so many pale, haggard, thin, care-worn, wrinkled, and yet young women, and I wonder what are the causes, and I think I have pointed out one, at least. Not only is the poor wife overworked all day, but she is liable to be poisoned by night by the exhalations of nicotine which rise from the skin and the lungs of her husband. Then she has headache, faintness, and giddiness, but no one

    -38-

    suspects these are the symptoms of nicotine poisoning! The true causes of such symptoms are never suspected.

    It is nobody's business to trace disease to its original causes, unless the general practitioner undertakes it. As a rule he has little time for such an enquiry, or feels that it is useless.

    I have heard medical men argue that smoking cannot be one of the chief causes of insanity because the asylums have more female inmates than male. I ask if it is unreasonable to suggest that the gross and brutal selfishness on the part of a husband is not calculated to cause insanity in the wife?

    Nothing is more difficult than to trace mental disease or insanity to its true origin; there is, however, only too much evidence to show that excessive smoking has often caused insanity. Experience teaches that the mental condition of a husband influences that of his wife: if he is cheerful, hopeful and contented, it helps the wife to be like him; on the other hand, when the husband is morose, dull, idle, or fond of drink and tobacco, he exerts a bad influence over the wife. Hence, the husband who abuses himself with tobacco and alcohol will ultimately destroy his wife's health and happiness. An unhealthy woman is unable to rear healthy children, even in a good environment, and this, I believe, is the explanation of the excessive amount of disease amongst the children of the rich and poor in the countries of Great Britain, Europe and America. Sickly children are always peevish and fretful, and when the parents get weary of their crying they give them sweets to pacify them. A craving for sweets is acquired early in life, and prevents the proper nourishment of the child. The sickly and stunted children that now crowd the schools of this country are a source of grave anxiety to all thoughtful people.

    The report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration contains ample evidence of the widespread evil of alcoholic excess among men and women, both as a cause of disease and poverty. The evils of juvenile smoking in checking growth were emphasized by Professor Cunningham, but no inquiries were made as to the evils of excessive smoking among adults. This is a serious omission, as superficial observers are apt to conclude that smoking is a harmless pastime. In my opinion it is a

    -39-

    dangerous habit for a youth under twenty-one, and is liable to lead to gambling, drinking and other vices.

    It always seems illogical to suggest or assert that smoking is harmful before the age of twenty-one, and harmless after that age. I have never received an explanation on this point.

    It puzzles me to know how boys will be prevented from smoking and injuring their prospects so long as they see their parents and teachers set such store on it. I was speaking to a man lately, and he said, "smoking is the only pleasure I have in life." Are there not many like him?

    When I was in London two years ago I noticed a number of "unemployed" sitting contentedly on the seats and parapets on the Thames Embankment. The majority had their pipes in their mouths and their hands in their pockets, and they did not look eager for work. Now everyone knows that tobacco is not food, but the craving for a smoke is so strong in some men that they are content to starve their stomachs in order to satisfy the craving for a whiff of poison. Such men soon fall victims to consumption and other diseases.

    All observers are agreed that the chief factor in causing disease are over-crowding in small tenements, female factory labour, and want of proper care of infants and children. We must not be content with these statements, but we must inquire how it happens that these people are living under such conditions. Why are they so poor that they cannot afford to pay the rent of a nice cottage?

    In too many cases their poverty is caused by their indulgence in tobacco and strong drink. What proof can I give of this statentent? Is there any village or town so poor that it cannot support one or more public houses and many tobacconists? The very poorest districts can pay for these injurious luxuries.

    The law takes care of the property of youths under twenty-one, and does not allow a minor to have control of his property, he is placed under guardians: why does not the law also take an equal care for the health of his body? The most critical time of a lad's life is just after leaving school; if he forms bad habits then he may never be able to regain his self-reapect; he needs guidance, help, and protection till he reaches the age of twenty-one. Do fathers and mothers always realize their responsibilities?

    -40-

    and do they behave themselves in such a way as to be entitled to the "honour" which children are commanded by God to give to their parents? Do parents try and help their children to keep the Fifth Commandment? Can children honour and obey parents who stagger, and fight like demons, when under the influence of drink?

    Have we traced the craving for alcohol to its origin? It is not a natural craving, it is acquired. In my experience non-smokers hardly ever become drunkards, while nearly all drunkards are smokers.

    I am of opinion that the only way to check intemperance is to persuade the lads of our country to pledge themselves to abstain from tobacco and alcohol until they reach the age of twenty-one. Does this suggestion seem impossible? by no means, if the Christian men and women combine and determine to organize societies all over the country to effect this purpose; the majority of lads will see that it is for their good and gladly give the pledge. I appeal to all those who love and serve our Lord Jesus Christ to help in this work.

    Ed. Note: By 2001, we know education does not work. Better solutions: adopting Iowa-style cigarette manufacturing bans everywhere; criminal prosecutions of tobacco pushers for the deaths they have caused.

    The words of the poet [Henry Wadsworth] Longfellow [1807-1882] must be our watchword and our motto:

    "The wrong shall fail,
    The right prevail,
    With peace on earth,
    Goodwill to men."

    It will be a hard fight to reclaim our lads for purity and sobriety, but "if God be for us, who can be against us?"

    -41-
    CHAPTER VI.

    MIND YOUR MIND AND YOUR MIND WILL MIND YOUR BODY,
    AND YOU WILL POSSESS A SOUND MIND IN A SOUND BODY.

    IT is my opinion, that many diseases which are now ascribed to alcohol, are really due to tobacco. It seems strange that the medical teachers should fail to see the connection between tobacco and the ever increasing disorders of the nervous system, the arterial system, the digestive system and the pulmonary system. Last, but not least, are the disorders of the sexual system which occur in the male and the female. When the costs and penalties of the tobacco habit are fully and fairly considered, we must certainly agree with the opinion of the late Sir B. Ward Richardson, M.D., "that smoking is a doubtful pleasure with a certain penalty."

    I have heard many arguments from all sorts of men, and many ingenious excuses for a puff, but the only one that meets my approval is the case of a man with a scolding wife, who goes out of doors to look at the stars and smoke a pipe to keep his wife at a safe distance. I plead specially with medical men, because they are trusted by the public to speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, in all matters which concern the health. We are not compelled to denounce the use of alcoholic beverages in moderation, but we ought to denounce every drug habit as highly dangerous.

    I regard the smoking of tobacco as the most universal and pernicious of all drug habits. It is instructive to trace the origin of the tobacco habit, and compare it with the origin of the alcoholic habit. Wine is mentioned frequently in the Holy Scriptures, and our Lord, by a miracle at

    -42-

    the marriage feast in Cana, turned water into wine. The use of wine has the best credentials, but the smoking habit was copied from unlettered savages. It is still a universal habit among uncivilised races. It is more common among women than men in Uganda. I hope some smoker may follow the example of the black woman, who of her own free will gave up smoking when she became a Christian, because the missionaries had taught her, that her body was intended to be a temple for the dwelling of the Holy Spirit, and she felt it would be wrong to blacken such a temple with tobacco smoke.

    "HONOUR THY FATHER AND THY MOTHER, THAT
    THY DAYS MAY BE LONG IN THE LAND."

    To disobey is to dishonour. I know of many young men of great promise, and of excellent character, who after beginning to smoke, have come to utter grief, and brought sorrow and shame on their parents. When I lived in London I was intimate with five young men, all brothers, well educated men, with good prospects; four of them began to smoke, and one by one they died off, having accomplished nothing to their credit. Tobacco and drink were the causes of their downfall. The only one of that family, now alive, refrained from smoking, and he is an active, clever, and prosperous mnan. There is nothing more distressing than to see a man become a wreck through his own folly. I know these young men acted contrary to the wishes of their father, for I know he hated smoking. The habits of his sons were a source of great grief to him.

    There are some people who try to argue that tobacco is good for some, and bad for others. Every medical man knows that tobacco contains a deadly poison called nicotine. If a man swallows a few drops of nicotine, he will fall down insensible at once, and probably die from the effects in a few minutes.

    Some men argue that smoking is not forbidden in the Bible. I think that the Sixth Commandment is applicable, "Thou shalt do no murder." There are different ways of committing murder; there is the sudden murder, and the slow murder. If a man takes frequent whiffs of poisonous smoke, he is shortening his life, therefore he is killing himself by slow degrees; this is murder by slow processes. There is a great uncertainty about the effects of tobacco; sometimes

    -43-

    it causes sudden death by stopping the heart's action.

    We know that God has great respect for human life. Cain was banished for killing his brother Abel [Genesis 4:8-12]. The answer which went up from the first murderer is often repeated in our own day,

    "Am I my brother's keeper?"

    What answer does our Lord give to this question; he answers,

    "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."
    [Leviticus 19:18; Matthew 19:19; Matthew 22:39]

    It seems to me, thefore, it is the duty of all who know the evil effects of smoking, to do all they can to warn those who are ignorant. Every man knows that smoking is particularly detrimental to boys under twenty-one. It will stop their growth, weaken their minds, and make them short-winded and weak. Do boys know all this?

    Now I venture to say, if men and women would combine and use their authority, the boys could soon be reduced to obedience. It requires a little patient remonstrance, and a few words of kind warning.

    I cannot imagine why boys smoke, it is very unpleasant. No one would dream of climbing on the roof of a house and holding his head over a chimney and breathing the smoke, and yet coal smoke is less poisonous than tobacco smoke.

    Ed. Note: In contrast to Dr. Tidswell's 1912 non-law-based explanation below, note modern legal and historical data on
  • informed consent,
  • pusher fraud,
  • pusher intent,
  • natural and probable consequences,
  • targeting children,
  • coumarin, and
  • murder precedents.
  • The only explanation I can give is, that we have a great idol in this land called Fashion. Fashion is stronger than the King. Fashion is an autocratic tyrant, his subjects are slaves, and are not allowed to think for themselves or choose between right and wrong. This is not right; we are the children of God, and we must not let Fashion rule over us. God alone should rule over us; He should be our supreme Ruler, and we should disregard the fashion of the world when it is contrary