TCPG Presents
Criminology 001, Lecture 001:
Profiling Criminals: Identifying
WHO
Commits Most of the Crimes
PREVENT CRIME AND VIOLENCE
Here's How—According to Medical Studies

The U.S. is No. 1 in incarcerations in the world. The U.S. has more people per capita incarcerated than any other nation in the world.

This site assists in opposing crime and violence
  • by citing the medical data on the subject 1836 to present, and

  • by revealing what judges "everywhere" know, via data generated in the criminal processing system.

  • First, let's note that doctors and other researchers have thoroughly and long studied the crime problem. They have studied, in short, the process how noncriminals are changed, turned, into criminals.

    Criminals are, in other words, manufactured. Medical researchers analyze and show how this manufacturing process is done. Such people know, describe, and report the manufacturing process. This site reveals that information; and now you too can know what they have found about the criminal-manufacturing process.

    Medical research techniques are well-established. They have been thoroughly established and fine-tuned since the 1530's, as particularly applied by Dr. James Lind's 1740's - 1790's activism campaign, discussed more below.

    A bibliography, and a section quoting judges, follows, after these introductory comments:

    The underlying factor in crime is the single most-studied health risk factor in the history of medicine, in the history of mankind.

    The underlying studies are in the tens of thousands. The data is voluminous. The subject is, has long been, very long been, important to researchers. It is about time that you be told what doctors found so long ago on the subject, and continue to verify, re-verify, and re-re-verify.

    Doctors long ago found that the 90% factor underlying crime is the same one underlying

  • lung cancer,

  • alcoholism,

  • drug abuse, and

  • suicide.
  • What is that factor? What is the common 90% factor in all these seemingly different matters? What did researchers find out about criminals? How are non-criminals turned into criminals? What is the common link? When did doctors find out? How long ago did they begin publishing the data?

    A detailed journal and volume listing is below, but please read this introduction first.

    This is significant data that they found. If used, this data
  • could and would prevent most crimes,

  • prevent non-criminals being turned into criminals,

  • prevent you and loved ones becoming victimized,

  • prevent media citing you, and your tragedy, in one of their news "sob stories" ("if it bleeds, it leads"), and

  • reduce the pressures for phony 'tough' or 'feel-good' solutions and punishments.
  • It is about time that you be told what doctors found, what has been published in medical journals and other places not easily available to the non-specialist.

    Remember the question: What did doctors (using their long and well-established methods) discover about criminals?

    Answer: They found—and repeatedly published voluminously time and time again, 1836 to present—that about 90% of crime is committed by one specific, discrete, easily identifiable population category. That one group doing 90% of the lung cancer, the alcoholism, and the suicide is also doing the crime.

    Before you go on, you must get out of your head, the media myth, the innuendo of the media pundits on "Action News," that doctors are too stupid to have ever studied the crime subject!

    Media, and politicians, would have you believe that doctors, though they had a great proven technique for problem-solving, did not use it to analyze crime causation!

    According to them, doctors are just too stupid to use their proven cause-finding technique,
    • to study the crime subject,
    • to study who commits crime,
    • to study to see if they can find any solution to prevent crime.

    If you believe the media and politicians, there is nothing further for this webpage to say. Sorry, we researchers just don't know, we never studied the subject!!

    Too bad, doctors just never looked into the crime-causation subject! Sorry, doctors study everything else, not this!! Sorry, doctors just don't know!

    That's the impression you get from the media pundits, and politicians.

    But ask yourself, "If doctors did study the subject, just WHO did doctors find commits about 90% of the crimes?" Take your time before answering. . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    It is about time that you be told what doctors and other researchers found; that you be told what law enforcement officials and judges a CENTURY ago told our ancestors about.

    "[I]t is evident that . . . punishment is not imposed until after the deed is done. It is . . . directed against effects, but it does not touch the causes, the roots, of the evil."

    "[W]e have but to look around us . . . to see that the criminal code . . . remedies nothing."

    The hope is "That which has happened in medicine [prevention] will happen in criminology."—Enrico Ferri, Lecture (Univ. of Naples, 24 April 1901), in The Positive School of Criminology: Three Lectures Given at the University of Naples, Italy, on April 22, 23 and 24, 1901 (Chicago: C.H. Kerr & Co., 1906 and 1912).

    Ferri (1856-1929) was a legal scholar involved in developing criminology as an academic discipline.


    Eliminate the cause; the effect disappears. "Sublatâ causa, tollitur effectus: Otez la cause, l'effet disparaît."—Dr. Hippolyte Adéon Depierris, Physiologie Sociale (Paris: Dentu, 1876), p 328.

    Dr. Depierris (1810-1889) was a contemporary researcher on this subject in Ferri's era.


    "[L]ike eruptions on the human body," crimes "are symptoms of more fundamental conditions of personal or social deficiency or imbalance."

    For "the crime problem to be solved, the attack must be made at the source of the trouble and the remedy must be found in the removal of the causes."—Henry W. Anderson, Chairman, Committee on the Causes of Crime, National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement (1931).


    See a similar analysis by Charles B. Towns, Ph.D., Habits That Handicap (New York: The Century Co, 1915), pp 248-249.
    Flatly, or ironically, "punishment does not deter."—C. R. Jeffery, "Criminal Behavior and Learning Theory," 56 J. Crim. Law, Criminology & Pol. Sci. 294-300 (1965), a fact learned by every criminology student.
    If you would prefer to NOT be a crime victim, and would rather that the incident (e.g., your being murdered) be prevented, as distinct from your name being added to the list of those re whom the perpetrator was 'punished' or 'rehabilitated,' you should know that the 90% factor in prevention has long, long been known.

    Doctors found the specific operative factor in the criminal manufacturing process.

    Yes, they found it.

    What did they find?

    They found that most, about 90% of crime, is due to mental disorder, brain damage, impairing memory.

    Knowledge of laws, ethics, self-control, involves the memory. When brain damage (like a "shot through the head," explained below) impairs the memory, criminals don't follow the laws because they can't remember the laws.

    Nor can they remember the concept of 'getting caught.'

    Vernon H. Mark, M.D., and Frank R. Ervin, M.D., in their book Violence and the Brain (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), explain in exhaustive detail this basic medical fact.

    This basic medical fact has been reported for a century and a half, that most criminals have brain damage tantamount to having suffered "a shot through the head". It has been researched and reported in great detail.

    This lecture, this site, long as it is, provides an introductory overview of that voluminous data, and, especially, the cause of that said brain damage so common among criminals.

    As Dr. Samuel Solly said in 1856, it would help readers on this subject if they would go to medical school, to study anatomy and physiology! Our ancestors did.

    This site can't send you to medical school, but it can give you an overview of this one narrow facet of what is known, and some pertinent bibliography. So please keep reading this, the linked sites, and the medical references.

    'The life you save may be your own.'

               When medical researchers state that they have found the cause (the 90% factor) of lung cancer, that assertion is not deemed unacceptable. But let's see how people react when told that, by the same analytical process, the same occupation has found the 90% factor in crime.

               Let's dare to say what was found. But first, be aware that the reason you have not been told this is . . . the answer offends some people. Yes, offends people, just as in the Middle Ages, people were offended to be told that their bad sanitary practices were what was causing the plague. Doctors' research is ok, except . . . when they find facts that some people don't like. So as you have kept reading, it is hoped that you won't be offended.

    Who is the one discrete, identifiable population group with the memory problem that is involved in about 90% of the crime? What did doctors find, and report? ________________________

    Decide Your Answer, Then
    Check Your Answer Below




















    That one group with the memory problem is called

    "smokers."

    Do not be surprised at this, and at the role of memory loss in crime. Smokers are also the people disproportionately getting Alzheimer's Disease disproportionately.

    Oops, the media pundits never told you that medical fact either! It is realized that you likely have never been taught this fact (the cigarette-crime link) though children of the turn-of-the-century were.

    Education a century ago on the cigarette-crime link was then so comprehensive, even among children, and so widely known, that in 1897, Iowa and Tennessee, and in 1909 Michigan, passed laws to ban this 90% factor—another fact you likely have never heard of. Quotes from the vast literature on the subject are listed below.

    Doctors have been trying hard for well over a century (since at least 1836) to get the public to realize the tobacco-role-in-crime, and to favor crime prevention via tobacco control. The courts know this; here's a quote from a recent court decision upheld by the United States Supreme Court:

    "Nationwide, the [ratio] of smokers [to non-smokers] in prisons is 90 percent." McKinney v Anderson, 924 F2d 1500, 1507 n 21 (CA 9, 1991), affirmed and remanded by U.S. Supreme Court, 509 US 25; 113 S Ct 2475; 125 L Ed 2d 22 (1993).

    The courts, the judges, know that most criminals are smokers. You should too!

               "Maternal prenatal smoking predicts persistent criminal outcome in male offspring."—Patrica A. Brennan, Ph.D., Emily R. Grekin, Sarnoff A. Mednick, Ph.D., Dr.Med., "Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Adult Male Criminal Outcomes," 56 Arch Gen Psychiatry (#3) 215-219 (March 1999).

               A 1997 study had likewise linked maternal smoking and subsequent aggression by the child. See Jacob F. Orlebeke, Dirk L. Knol, and Frank C. Verhulst, "Increase in Child Behavior Problems Resulting from Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy," 52 Archives of Environmental Health (#4) 317-321 (July/Aug. 1997).

    These studies, and others, involve doctors repeatedly citing an aspect of the tobacco-crime link, yet more studies added to the stack since 1833.

                This webpage summarizes the repeatedly medically-verified role of cigarettes in the crime process (the cigarettes-crime link). Here are details.

    Cigarettes are the gateway drug delivery agent, initiating children into the drug lifestyle. Cigarettes contain toxic chemicals, and cause abulia or anomie (impaired impulse and ethical controls—the medical terminology for a deadened conscience). Wherefore (as published since the 1830's), about 90% of crime is by smokers. This fact analysis may seem unusual, but here is an example of the analysis-process we may remember from grade school.

             We learned (as alluded to above) that Dr. James Lind (who was aware of similar 1537 data), observed in 1747 that statistics showed a scurvy-fruit juice link, or correlation. Sailors who drank fruit juice (from oranges, lemons, or limes) did not get scurvy. The others who did not, did get scurvy.

    Dr. Lind did not know why the statistics showing a scurvy-fruit juice link were true. (Vitamins such as vitamin C would not be discovered for almost two centuries.)

             Since Dr. Lind had nothing to prove his link claim but statistics ("who" gets the scurvy, not, "why" they get it), the government, the politicians, refused to accept Lind's statistics for almost fifty years. Many people suffered as a result.

    Doctors pleaded that the statistics be acted on. NO. NO. No. No. NO. NO, was the government's answer, the politicians' answer, 'We hate your d—n statistics.'

    Dr. Lind died. People kept suffering from scurvy.

    Finally, in 1795, the British navy agreed not to wait for proof the statistics are true in terms of why, but simply to respect them, in terms of who. The navy put limes on its ships, so many that British sailors would sometimes be called "limeys." Scurvy ceased among them!

    Knowing who gets a problem and dealing with that, works, doctors said. Knowing the who factor alone is sufficient to act—no need to wait centuries until some research doctor discovers why!

             Not until almost two centuries after Dr. Lind's discovery did chemist Jack C. Drummond call the mysterious statistical thing that was working—"Vitamin C"—in 1920.

    A reader-friendly book on this subject is by Isaac Asimov, Ph.D., How Did We Find Out About Vitamins? (New York: Walker and Co, 1974), pages 8-10.

    A number of lives were saved, many were made healthier, beginning in 1795, by finally simply accepting the 1747 statistics, and not waiting for that 1920 discovery.

    And doctors likewise solved (without knowing "why," just "who") problems such as smallpox, rabies, streptococcus infections, sewage-caused diseases, etc.

    Do NOT believe the innuendo of the media pundits on "Action News," do not believe the politicians, do not believe that doctors NEVER studied the crime subject! Never used the proven technique for problem-solving. Never studied who commits crime. Never studied to see if they can find any common factor in crime.

    Sorry, doctors study everything else, not this!! Sorry, doctors just don't know!

    Remember, media don't get viewers by giving boring statistical "background" news! They give "action news." Politicians don't get votes by citing scholarly data. They get votes by being good ole' boys, smoozing, talking surface talk, no depth. These people (media, politicians) are personally lazy arrogant 'know-it-alls.' They hate doing in-depth work themselves; they resent people who do do it; and they don't want to know about those people who do do it. (If you don't believe this, try contacting such types about the data here; listen to their disbelief, their ridicule of same!) They make their living, feeding (like vultures) off your tragedies. If you don't have tragedies, lots of them, they won't have "talking points," they'll be unemployed!

    You are still reading. You believe it likely that doctors did, in fact, apply their long proven type of successful, result-oriented analysis to crime.

    You are right. Of course they did. Of course they found the common factor. They found out "who" does the crimes:

    "Nationwide, the [ratio] of smokers [to non-smokers] in prisons is 90 percent." McKinney, supra, 924 F2d 1507, affirmed and remanded, 509 US 25, supra.

    "In a survey of . . . incarcerated youths with an average age of 15.5 years, 94% were smokers. . . . Drivers who smoke are arrested for drunken driving more than three times as often as nonsmokers . . . receive 46% more traffic citations and are involved in 50% more automobile accidents than are nonsmokers, even when alcohol is taken into account." J. R. DiFranza, and M. P. Guerrera, "Alcoholism and Smoking," 51 J Studies Alcohol (#2) 130-135 (1990), p 134.

    Statistics show the cigarette-crime link. The government, the politicians, should act on those statistics, not wait for two centuries, with many suffering needlessly and dying while we wait for the proof of "why" the statistics are true.

    Actually, we don't need to wait. We already know the proof for, the why of, the statistics on the cigarette-crime link. We have known for over four centureies.

    Yes, we already long ago, centuries ago, knew why the cigarettes-crime link exists, and have known since the 1600's. We know why as a "natural and probable consequence," it is statistically smokers who commit most (90%) crime.

    The same type of analysis as done on scurvy is true on the cigarette-crime link. Doctors long ago found that cigarettes' toxic chemicals cause brain "injury" that impairs memory, e.g., "takes away the power of resistance" to impulses and harm up to and including death. Cigarettes' toxic chemicals lead to abulia, a "state of dethronement of reason from its governing power," People v Carmichael, 5 Mich 10, 21, 71 Am Dec 769 (1858) [And see full text].

    We know, and have known for over a century, what specific part of the brain burns out so to speak, opening the door to sociopathic and psychopathic behavior such as crime and violence. In law, of course, ignorance is no defense, so in law, we all know this—in law, not necessarily in reality.

    That is why this website exists, to let you know in fact, what you and everybody already "knows" by reason of the legal doctrine that ignorance is not a defense.
    See examples of data on the subject of smoker mental disorder, e.g.,
    *Lennox Johnston, "Tobacco Smoking and Nicotine," 243 The Lancet 741, 742 (19 Dec 1942).
    *Johnston, Smoking Cure, 263 Lancet 480-482 (6 Sep 1952);
    *Brown, Tobacco Addiction, 50 Tex St J Med 35-36 (Jan 1954);
    *Am Psychiatric Ass'n (APA), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1980) pp 159-160, 176-178, and (1987) pp 150-151, 181-182;
    *Nat'l Org. for Reform of Marijuana Laws v Bell, 488 F Supp 123, 138 (D DC, 1980) (referencing tobacco as a drug)
    *Caprin v Harris, 511 F Supp 589, 590 n 3 (D ND NY, 1981);
    *Comment, Tobacco Addiction, 81 Mich Law Rev 237-258 (Nov 1982); and
    *A. Ott, et al., Smoking, Dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease, 351 Lancet 1840-1843 (20 June 1998). (To acess Ott's article, register at the journal's website, http://www.thelancet.com.)

    See also Ronald M. Davis, M.D., (a health authority working for Michigan Governor John Engler during his first term), "The Language of Nicotine Addiction: Purging the Word 'Habit' From Our Lexicon," 1 Tobacco Control 163-164 (1992), opposing the malicious tobacco lobby / politician / media lie that smoking is merely a habit.

    Cigarettes' toxic chemicals impair impulse and ethical controls, impair self-control, i.e., cause anomie and abulia (typically understated as mere addiction). Cigarettes are the delivery agent for nicotine, the gateway (starter) drug for children (average age 12). Alcohol follows, average age 12.6; then marijuana, average age 14. Drug dependence develops in stages, requiring intervention at the earliest stage—cigarettes.

    References:
  • Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 17, Research on Smoking Behavior, DHEW Publication ADM 78-581 p vi (Dec 1977);

  • Robert DuPont, M.D., Teen Drug Use, 102 J Pediatrics 1003-1007 (June 1983);

  • Fleming, et al., Cigarettes' Role in The Initiation And Progression Of Early Substance Use, 14 Addictive Behaviors 261-272 (1989); and

  • Department of Health and Human Services, Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: Surgeon General Report (1994). Page 10 supports law enforcement, saying, "Illegal sales of tobacco products are common."
  •           Smokers suffer, then many self-medicate with alcohol. Drunk drivers are typically smokers, as police often see. "Smoking prevalence among active alcoholics approaches 90%."—J. T. Hayes, et al., Alcoholism and Nicotine Dependence Treatment, 15 J Addictive Diseases 135 (1996).

    So cigarettes lead, in turn, to licentiousness, promiscuity, pregnancy, SIDS, birth defects, and abortion. See for example the Surgeon General Report (1994), supra; and Joseph DiFranza, M.D., et al., "Effect of Maternal Cigarette Smoking," 40 J Family Practice 385-394 (April 1995).

    "When we take a thorough drug history, we are forced to admit that nicotine—not alcohol or cannabis—is the drug of entry for most young people."—Emanuel Peluso and Lucy Silvay Peluso, "The Challenge of Treating Teenagers," 9 Alcoholism & Addiction (#2) 21 (Dec 1988).

    "The first step toward addiction may be as innocent as a boy's puff on a cigarette in an alleyway," said the U.S. Supreme Court in Robinson v California, 370 US 660, 670; 82 S Ct 1417; 8 L Ed 2d 758 (1962).

    Once the abulic process of impairing ethical and impulse controls occurs, tobacco's 90% role in crime results. Most crime is committed by smokers, just as most lung cancer, suicide, etc., not to say that all smokers get/do such. "Maternal prenatal smoking predicts persistent criminal outcome in male offspring." See Brennan, et al., 56 Arch Gen Psychiatry 215-219 (March 1999). (This significant fact—doctors once again pointing out a facet of the cigarettes-crime link—received scant media attention.) There was also little media notice of the July 1997 study by Lauren S. Wakschlag, Ph.D., Benjamin B. Lahey, Ph.D., Bennett L. Leventhal, M.D., Rolf Loeber, Ph.D., stating the same in Archives of General Psychiatry.

               It is well-established in significant detail (far beyond mere "correlation") how cigarettes can have the brain effects that lead to decisions to commit crime. Tobacco smoke emits high quantities of carbon monoxide (42,000 particles though carbon monoxide is unsafe in quantities above 100 particles), as our site on cigarettes' toxic chemicals shows.

               Additionally, cigarette smoke is quite radioactive, as noted by, e.g., E. A. Martell, "Tobacco Radioactivity and Cancer in Smokers," 63 American Scientist 404-412 (July-August 1975). Radioactivity renders artery walls "highly permeable to the passage of red cells."

    That permeability fact, helps explain what was described a century ago:

  • "Autopsies have revealed large foci of softening in the brain, hemorrhages into the meninges, and capillary apoplexies in the brain substance."—G. W. Jacoby, 50 New York Medical Journal 172 (17 August 1889).

  • "Ecchymosis occurs in the pleura and peritoneum. Hyperemia of the lungs, brain, and cord is found. . . . Coarse lesions have been found in the brain and spinal cord."—L. P. Clark, 71 Medical Record (#26) 1073 (29 June 1907).

  • Tobacco damages the conscience, says Count Leo Tolstoy, Why Do People Intoxicate Themselves? (1890), p 5, thus leads to crime, p 10.
  •            This combination of brain damage effects from cigarettes' toxic chemicals such as carbon monoxide and radioactivity, foreseeably, as a "natural and probable consequence," leads to mental disorder and crime.

              The tobacco-crime link has been cited many times by prison officials, judges, doctors, and crime analysts since Dr. Alcott (1836), e.g., by the Auburn Report (1854); by Hodgkin, 1857; Buckley and Trask, 1860; Ellis, 1901; Lindsay, 1914; Torrance, 1916; Brum, 1924; Danis, 1925; Healy and Bonner, 1926; Crane, Dawson, Pollock and Shaw, 1931; Gehman, 1943; Wood, 1944, etc., etc.

               As these experts have shown, the 90% factor in crime has remained constant, unchanged across all the variables, societal changes 1836 to present, including radio, movies, television, Internet, pornography, depictions of graphic violence, and all other alleged factors. (Such irrelevant factors/variables are cited typically by persons who have NOT studied the subject, and/or are malicious, and/or wish to make money off crime and the suffering of others, by their circulating sensationalist disinformation to the gullible).

    For in-depth background, see
  • Eric Schlosser, “The Prison-Industrial Complex,” 282 Atlantic Monthly (#6) 51-77 (Dec 1998). “Crime is down, but the prison biz is booming--it creates jobs and corporate profits.” “[E]very one of them . . . becomes another lasting monument . . . to the fear and greed and political cowardice that now pervade American society,” p 77.
  • Prof. Michael A. Hallett, “Faith-Based Corrections as Symbolic Crusade,” 25 Humanity & Society (#4) 219-238 (2002) (notes misdirection of cited anti-crime activities)
  • Prof. Michael A. Hallett, “Commerce with Criminals: The New Colonialism in Criminal Justice,” 21 Rev Policy Research (#1) 49-62 (January 2004) (cites links between slavery and modern day private prisons)
  • Connie Cass, “Report: 1 of Every 75 U.S. Men in Prison” (Associated Press, Friday, 28 May 2004)
  • Sasha Abramsky, "Incarceration, Inc.," 279 The Nation (#5) 19/26 July 2004, pp 22-25 ("Under the current Administration, the private prison industry has aggressively expanded its reach at both the state and federal levels [p 23]." "Many impoverished counties have in recent years essentially converted themselves into for-profit prison speculators [p 24].")
  • Fr. John S. Rausch, Director, Catholic Committee of Appalachia, "It isn't 'I was up for charges and you made sure they threw the book at me.'" (Cited by the Associated Press, Samira Jafari, in "'Get saved or get busted': Kentucky churches toughen up on addicts," in The Macomb Daily, p 3B (21 July 2007). See also his article on prisons, "Rural Gulags" in Glenmary Challenge (Spring 2007), citing data that, e.g., “the prison population has been escalating to cataclysmic proportions.”
  • Adam Liptak, "Inmate Count in US Dwarfs Other Nations’" (The New York Times, 23 April 2008) ("The United States has less than 5 percent of the world’s population. But it has almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners. . . . The United States . . . has 751 people in prison or jail for every 100,000 in population. . . . The only other major industrialized nation that even comes close is Russia, with 627 prisoners for every 100,000 people. The others have much lower rates. England’s rate is 151; Germany’s is 88; and Japan’s is 63. The median among all nations is about 125, roughly a sixth of the American rate.")
    Note the contrast with the ancient world, "the Germanic tribes of the north" and "in England." "By and large, imprisonment was not used as a punishment," say Phyllis Elperin Clark, M.A., and Robert Lehrman, M.F.A., Doing Time: A Look at Crime and Prisons (New York: Hastings House, 1980, p 24. Restitution was made "to their victims," p 25.
    Indeed, note the contrast with even modern nations. The U.S. has a much higher incarceration rate than even so-called "dictatorships" (e.g., Libya, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, China and Pakistan). Their incarceration rate is from 57 - 207 per 100,000. In contrast, New Jersey does 313 per 100,000, and 600 per 100,000 in Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas. See data from Ronald Fraser, "Nation of gulags in land of the free" (Tuesday, 22 May 2007).
  •            This cigarette-crime link's constancy 1830's - present confirms beyond the court standard of "reasonable doubt," i.e., beyond ALL doubt, that the only, the exclusive, the sole 90% factor in crime is tobacco, ruling out all other alleged factors/variables.

    Statistics (and chemistry) ARE how doctors know this, have long known this, and more, as the analysis is of the same typical medical type done since at least the year 1537.

             Just as with scurvy, all other variables have been ruled out. (Doctors knew how to do that long ago, as our website refuting alleged variables allegedly causing cancer in the 1920's shows.) The same data analysis is true with crime.

    All other alleged variables—the 2% correlations (the Internet, guns, TV, pornography, even saying '98% of criminals eat bread, or drink milk' [as buttheads have told the web-writer] etc.)—have been proven irrelevant. But the latter are the only ones the public hears!! and loves to hear on "Action News"!! (some media-pundit airhead's 2¢ worth).

    A classic example of an exposé of the scam of citing a common factor, a non-variable, in the crime-causation field, was published at the turn of the twentieth century. This exposé was in the book by Charles Goring, M.D., The English Convict: A Statistical Study (Darling and Son, Ltd, for H.M. Stationery Office, 1913). Goring was debunking mythology of that era, phony assertions about criminals purporting to explain causation, but which included factors common to non-criminals!! Including common factors, vs focusing on the genuine variables, is an obvious methodology error. But it was scamming people then, so Dr. Goring took aim at it! Such an error is obviously a "fatal flaw" in methodology! as competent honest researchers well know! But watch, you see this scam perpetrated over and over again, even yet. The scammers (media, politicians, etc.) are confident that most people are uneducated compared to a century ago, so can not recognize that the scam was detected, exposed, debunked as long ago as 1913. (Our statistics site has more details).

    Note the term “press prostitute” concerning media types, by George Seldes, Witness to a Century (New York: Ballantine Books, 1987), pp. 331, 347, and 297. Note the phrase, “crooked and prostituted journalist,” p 347. Seldes also said of one such, that “he had sold himself . . . for money,” p 399. Sadly, the term “press prostitute” is a “now disused term,” says p 331.
    “You cannot hope to bribe or twist,
    thank God! the   .   .   .   journalist.
    But, seeing what the man will do
    unbribed, there's no occasion to!”
      —Humbert Wolfe (1930)
            (1886-1940)

    Though the post-gateway drugs, alcohol and other drugs, get media-blame for crime, the real truth is that the cigarette-crime link (90%) is higher; and tobacco is the starter drug, leding to the others in the first place.

    A 1997 U.S. Department of Justice survey found that what media-pundits tirade about, is not verified. Other factors such as they often allege, are significantly lesser in number. Hardly slightly over half, 52.4%, of state and federal prison inmates convicted of murder, reported having been under the influence of alcohol or drugs when they committed the offense. 52.4% is far less than 90%; yet the former is what media-pundit airheads emphasize. This site brings you the rest of the story.

              Here is something that should be clear even to an airhead . . . smoking and fires! Smokers' abulia results in fire-setting and rule-defying rebelliousness, as courts repeatedly deal with, e.g., in cases such as Haller v City of Lansing, 195 Mich 753; 162 NW 335 (1917); Tanton v McKenney, 226 Mich 245; 197 NW 510 (1924); Jacobs v Michigan State Mental Health Dep't, 88 Mich App 503; 276 NW2d 627 (1979); and Stevens v Inland Waters, Inc, 220 Mich App 212; 559 NW2d 61 (1996).


    "Nowhere is the practice of smoking more imbedded than in the nation's prisons and jails, where the proportion of smokers to non-smokers is many times higher than that of society in general." Doughty v Board, 731 F Supp 423, 424 (D Colorado, 1989). [See ALR Context].

    "Nationwide, the [ratio] of smokers [to non-smokers] in prisons is 90 percent." McKinney v Anderson, 924 F2d 1500, 1507 n 21 (CA 9, 1991), affirmed and remanded, 509 US 25; 113 S Ct 2475; 125 L Ed 2d 22 (1993).

    "William Wilkes, a Canewdon shepherd, was hanged on 19th July 1898 for murdering his wife by kicking her to death after they had quarreled over some tobacco." Source: "Tobacco causes crime of passion," in the History Notebook (Issue # 32, November 1998) by the Essex Police.

    By 1904, "it was found that nearly all of the incorrigible truants were cigaret fiends," and that "the Police Magistrates of this and other cities have stated again and again that the majority of juvenile delinquents appearing before them are cigaret fiends whose moral nature has been warped or destroyed through the instrumentality of this vice."—Charles B. Hubbell, President, New York City Board of Education (1904).

    "Recent careful investigations by many persons show that cigarette smoking not only clouds the intellect, but tends to make criminals of boys. Dr. Hutchison, of the Kansas State Reformatory, says: 'Using cigarettes is the cause of the downfall of more of the inmates of this institution than all other vicious habits combined.' Of 4117 boys received into the Illinois State Reformatory, 4000 were in the habit of using tobacco, and over 3000 were cigarette smokers."—Alvin Davison, The Human Body and Health: A Text-book of Essential Anatomy, Applied Physiology, and Practical Hygiene: Advanced (New York: American Book Co., 1908).

    "Investigations in prisons, and houses of correction, and State reform schools show that a vast majority of their inmates used Tobacco before they committed crime. . . . 'The more Tobacco, . . . the more . . . licentiousness, crime.'"—B. W. Chase, M.A., Tobacco: Its Physical, Mental, Moral and Social Influences (New York: Wm. B. Mucklow Pub, 1878), pp 70-71.

    "The Chaplain of the State Prison, at Auburn, for the year 1854 . . . reports. . . that five-sixths, or five hundred, out of six hundred who were convicted for crime . . . use . . . tobacco. Outside of this statistical statement, my own investigations, in a much larger measure, corroborate the truth of this record."—James C. Jackson, M.D., Tobacco and Its Effect Upon the Health and Character (Dansville, NY: Austin, Jackson & Co, Pub, 1879), p 19.

    And, "The testimony of those who have the care of our prisons and penitentiaries, is, that the inmates, most of whom have been habituated to using tobacco before they come there. . . . "—William A. Alcott, M.D., The Use of Tobacco: Its Physical, Intellectual, and Moral Effects on The Human System (New York: Fowler and Wells, 1836), p 19.

              In Iowa, the Legislature in 1897 reacted to such data, and made cigarettes illegal. Michigan's Legislature in 1909 made cigarettes with deleterious ingredients illegal. Cigarettes are not to be here—no manufacture, no sale, no giveaway. Contraband is "any property which is unlawful to produce." Black's Law Dictionary (St. Paul: West Publishing Co, 1990), p 322. Cigarettes are contraband. There is no right to use contraband. Bringing cigarettes into Michigan is "smuggling."

    "'Smuggling has well-understood meaning . . . signifying bringing . . . goods
    . . . importation . . . whereof is prohibited. Williamson v U.S., 310 F2d 192, 195 [CA 9, 1962]; 18 USC §§ 545-546.'" Black's Law Dict, supra, p 1389.

             The eminent Thomas Alva Edison in 1914 identified one factor—acrolein—in the permanent and irreversible brain damage that cigarettes cause. This evidence is in addition to the fact that a century+ of unvarying statistics conclusively show the cigarette-crime link.

    The government should act on those statistics, not wait for two centuries, with many suffering from crime needlessly (by being robbed, raped, murdered, etc. by criminals 90% of whom are smokers) while we wait for more proof of why the statistics are true. We already have adequate evidence. (Tennessee thought so in 1897! And so did Iowa.)

             In fact, in 1909, during the administration of three-term activist Governor Fred Warner, the Michigan legislature passed a law forbidding cigarettes for reasons such as this one. The data on the cigarette-crime link was already well-established then. Members of the clergy were concerned. That 1909 law, MCL § 750.27, MSA § 28.216, bans

    "any person within the state" from action that "manufactures, sells or gives to anyone,
    any cigarette containing any ingredient deleterious to health or foreign to tobacco . . . ."
    Analysis of the Michigan Cigarette Control Law

             By the law attacking the 90% factor in crime, the idea is to reduce the resultant crime significantly. The intent is to reduce crime so much so that the suppliers and sellers will cease operation, reducing availability, thus potentially eliminating both crime and other cigarette effects, examples of which are listed or detailed at our home page and its various links.


    "There are certainly studies documenting the different growth and brain development [of children whose mothers smoke while pregnant]."--Pamela Spry, Certified Nurse-Midwife, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA. "Babies of women who smoke tend to have less brain development, a lower birth weight, and less growth. Smokers also tend to have more problems with premature births, and the placenta separating during pregnancy. Women who smoke restrict the amount of oxygen going to the unborn child. Tar, nicotine, carbon dioxide, and other harmful substances replace the oxygen, Spry said."--Kristin Storey, "Smoke now, pay later with bratty children?," The Detroit News (10 Jan 1996), p 3J.

    According to "Tobacco Causes Crime?" (16 May 1996), the Texas Commission for Alcohol and Drug Abuse surveyed pre-incarceration drug use, and found the following:

    Females
    Males
    LifetimePast MonthLifetimePast Month
    Tobacco
    95%
    78%
    90%
    74%
    Alcohol
    94%
    46%
    98%
    54%
    Marijuana
    83%
    14%
    85%
    19%
    Cocaine/Crack
    77%
    31%
    60%
    19%

    Mother's StatusChild Conduct Disorders
    Nonsmoker40%
    Under 10 Cigarettes Daily70%
    10 or More Cigarettes Daily81%
    --University of Chicago Study,reported Jan 1996

    According to David Ingram of the Winston-Salem Journal (North Carolina), 16 January 2006 article, “Tougher Times: Prisons adjusting to limitations on smoking: New State Law: Inmates Must Step Outside to Smoke,” “an estimate last year said that 70 percent of inmates do, about triple the percentage in the population at-large.”


    "The action of smoking on the brain" includes "great irritability of temper," Samuel Booth, LSA, 1 The Lancet (#1748) 229 (28 Feb 1857).

    Thus, "crime keeps pace with the increased consumption of tobacco . . . . Statistics will bear me out in this assertion. Witness the necessity of providing 'reformatory schools' for juvenile delinquents—the inveterate smokers of the present,"—Dr. Hodgkin, 1 The Lancet (#1751) 303 (21 March 1857).

    Smoker behavior includes "an alarming passion for fraudulently obtaining . . . money. This propensity to . . . vicious habits . . . I . . . ascribe . . . to . . . tobacco," J. Taylor, LSA, 1 The Lancet (#1749) 250 (7 March 1857).

    "It is an undisputable fact, and one that should give us considerable concern, that . . . nearly all criminals are cigarette smokers. . . . [Toxicity] present in the smoke of the cigarette acts upon the brain cells and nerve tissues in such a manner as to bring about a degeneracy of these structures . . . develops criminal tendencies. . . . Whenever I read of a dastardly crime's having been committed, by inquiry I have found that in practically every such case the criminal was a cigarette addict. Go with me to any . . . court and ask the judge what percentage of . . . offenders . . . are cigarette smokers. He will tell you that nearly all of them are. I have never heard a lower estimate than 93 per cent." Daniel H. Kress, M.D., The Cigarette As A Physician Sees It (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press Publishing Ass'n, 1931), p 67.

    "John D. Quackenbos, M.D., of Columbia University, has said that 'the gravest of all the evils resulting from cigarette addiction is the lessening or complete loss of moral sensibility, with a conspicuous tendency to falsehood and theft. The moral propensities are eventually destroyed because of the destruction of those elements of the brain through which moral force is expressed. The [smoker] degenerates . . . for the penitentiary or the asylum.'" (Kress, supra, p 68).

    The foregoing data explains why our great-grandparents' era, far more so than now, was concerned about national and adults' example,
    • for setting a good one,

    • against setting a bad one:

    See instances of that era's writings (1833-1916):

    1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16;
    17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29;
    30; 31; 32; 33; 34; 35; 36; 37; 38; 39; 40; 41; 42;
    43; 44; 45; 46; 47; 48; 49; 50; 51; 52; 53; 54; 55, 56

    Naturally, in that era, laws such as Michigan's cigarette-making ban followed, to ensure that adults would set a good example for children, thus prevent crime, tobacco effects, and tobacco costs to society.


    Judges, prosecutors, police, etc., know of the distinction between "criminals or would-be criminals" and "those of us who have never needed a deterrent."––Leslie Wilkins, "Criminology, An Occupational Research Approach," in Alan T. Welford (ed.), Society: Problems and Methods of Study (New York: Philosophical Library, 1962), p 323.

    Judges, prosecutors, police, etc., also know that

    "as a result of toxic or other organic destructive processes [the brain can be] considerably damaged or totally paralyzed."––Franz G. Alexander and Hugo Staub, The Criminal, the Judge, and the Public: A Psychological Analysis, 2d ed (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956), p 119.

    And these officials know that "very great" number of "neurotic criminals" are being made, who "cannot help doing" crimes. Only a tiny "very small" number of deterrable individuals are involved in crime, Alexander and Staub, supra, pp 209-11.

    Who constitutes the "very great" group, the large, disproportionate preponderance of criminals? What is the criminal-making process? Judges, prosecutors, police, etc., know the answer. You should too.


    Pertinent Quotes From Judges,
    by Dr. Kress,
    Pp 72-74

    "Judge Crane of New York City says: 'Cigarettes are ruining our children, endangering their lives, dwarfing their intellects, and making them criminals fast. [Smokers] seem to lose all sense of right, decency, and righteousness.'"

    Judge Ben Lindsey, former judge of the Denver Juvenile Court, has said: 'One of the very worst 'habits' . . . is the cigarette habit. This has long been recognized by all the judges of the courts who deal with young criminals, and especially by judges of police courts, before whom pass thousands of men every year who are addicted to intemperate habits. These judges know that in nearly every case the [alcoholics] who appear before them . . . began [by] smoking cigarettes. One bad habit led to another. The nicotine and poison in the cigarette created an appetite for alcoholic drink. The cigarette habit not only had a grip upon them . . . but it invited all the other demons of habit to come in and add to the degradation that the cigarette began.'”

    “Hon. George Torrance, former superintendent of the Illinois State Reformatory, says: 'I am sure cigarettes are destroying and making criminals of more [youth] than liquor. . . . We have found that when a [youth] is guilty of a grievous offense, he is generally found to be a user of cigarettes.'”

    "Judge B. S. Shaw of Hart, Michigan, says: 'In every instance of juvenile delinquency in this court I have found that the boys were cigarette users.'"

    "Judge Allen of Lisbon, North Dakota, says: 'Every male juvenile delinquent brought before me for the last seventeen years has been a cigarette smoker.'"

    "Judge Pollock of Fargo, North Dakota, said: 'Every boy brought into this court the past sixteen years was a cigarette smoker.'"

    Pertinent Quotes From Others, Pp 72-74

    "Dr. Hutchinson of the Kansas State Reformatory, said: 'Cigarettes are the cause of the downfall of more boys in this institution that all other vicious habits combined.'"

    "Dr. Coffin, who for over twenty years was connected with the Whittier Reform School of California, said: 'Fully 98 per cent of all youthful offenders who have been confined to this institution were cigarette [smokers], and 95 per cent were cigarette [addicts].'"

    "Miss Winters, principal of one of the largest schools for delinquent girls in America, has said concerning her institution, 'Out of over eleven hundred inmates, only twenty were nonsmokers of cigarettes.'" [about 1.8%!.]

    "Prof. Templeton P. Twiggs, for many years principal of the largest grammar school in Detroit, and later supervisor of the Department of School Attendance . . . says: 'Through his [the smoker's] loss of self-control, he has no moral standard. He seems unable to distinguish between right and wrong, or to possess sufficient will power to do what is right even if he knows. He is absolutely untrustworthy, and there is usually no extreme to which he will not go.'" Kress, supra, pp 74-75.

    An example of smoker's impaired impulse control is this: to have the "sadistic life quite unimpeded," "liked blood," and the "powerless" aspects of the victim, said A. A. Brill, 3 International Journal of Psychoanalysis (#4) 430-444 at 437-8 (Dec 1922).

    "[C]igarettes are . . . making criminals . . . . Cigarettes are not the effect of crime, but they are the cause of it. . . . Dr. Gentry, of Chicago, says . . . 'The only way to stop the increase of . . . criminals . . . is to stop the use of tobacco, and also the raising and manufacture of it. . . . The use of tobacco is a great crime.'" Theodore F. Frech and Rev. Luther H. Higley, The Evils of Tobacco and Cigarettes (Butler, Indiana: Higley Printing Co, 1916), pp 123-124.

    Cigarettes render smokers "dépossédés du sens humain . . . par une impulsion qu'on ne peut qualifier que de folie . . . désordre . . . comme les bêtes fauves . . . . dégradation narcotique les abaisse . . . rage . . . déchirent, ils mutilent sans nécessité, par instinct féroce."—Dr. Hippolyte A. Dépierris, Physiologie Sociale, supra, p 342.

    Dr. Depierris explained the entire crime-causing process of tobacco:
  • tobacco's violent and behavior-altering effects on animals, p 129,

  • how it had already been used to poison somone (the 1851 Bocarmé murder case), pp 79ff,

  • tobacco's mind-altering, behavior-impairing effects on people, pp 345-372,

  • tobacco-produced delirium, p 202 (concept cited by Dr. Kolb, 1968, infra),

  • tobacco's violence-producing effects (like that on animals) on people, p 342,

  • and examples of this effect, pp 326-344.

  • "the cause," "the only way"
    to prevent crime
    1916

    “Judges . . . have remarked on [tobacco] as an almost invariable accompaniment and aggravator of juvenile delinquency.”—Pryns Hopkins, Ph.D., Gone Up in Smoke: An Analysis of Tobaccoism (Culver City, CA: Highland Press, 1948), p 254. And, “one will almost never find an adult criminal nor even a juvenile delinquent but who is a smoker,” p 43.

    “[J]udges of juvenile courts everywhere recognize the close relationship that exists between cigarettes and crime. . . . Not only does the use of cigarettes produce a criminal tendency . . . it also produces what might be termed [psychopathy aka abulia aka anomie aka empathy-loss] . . . a condition in which lying, thieving, and murder become as natural as eating and drinking . . . .”—Bernarr MacFadden, The Truth about Tobacco (New York: Physical Culture Corp, 1924), pp 87 and 77, respectively, describing the psychopath (“predator”) concept, as per smoker deviance/licentiousness.

    For an example of this smoker brain-damage induced lack of empathy, note this example of smoker Jayne's reaction after causing a crash by his ignoring a stop sign, hitting oncoming traffic, killing five people and injuring others: “after Jayne caused the incident he got out, sat on the side of the road and said 'this is going to mean a world of hurt for me.' He lit up a cigarette and waited for the police.”
    “Yes [says commentary], poor Jayne is in a world of hurt. Sounds like he didn’t even care that he killed 5 people and injured 3 more. 4 of the dead were children” (Details.)

    "Judge Brum, of Pottsville, Pa., charging the jury in the case of a young cigarette fiend, accused of murder, said: 'The fact that the prisoner is a cigarette fiend must be taken into consideration.' Pointing to the cigarette-stained fingers of the prisoner, he said that the number of cigarettes used by him 'was proof in his mind that the prisoner's brain was affected.'" (Pp. 88-89).

    "What has been called a 'crime wave' in the United States the past few years has been misnamed. It is not a wave. It is a harvest—the natural result of the sowing . . . 'Sow tobacco, and reap crime' [i.e., tobacco causes crime]. The Criminal, published for detectives and police officers, says 93 per cent. of all criminals use tobacco before committing the crimes leading to their arrests. . . . Hon. George Torrance says: 'Of 4,117 boys received into the Illinois State Reformatory, since its organization on Jan. 8, 1893, 95 per cent. had the tobacco habit, and nearly all were cigarette smokers.'"—Will H. Brown, Tobacco Under the Searchlight (Cincinnati: The Standard Publishing Co, 1925), pp 62-64.

    "The cigarette is often responsible for the worst sort of insanity—moral insanity; more than half the shocking crimes we hear of being committed by young lads are directly traceable to the cigarette habit. This is tobacco in the worst form. It deadens the sensibilities [including empathy for victims], wrecks the nervous system, weakens the brain, and all the evils of over-stimulation are the natural result. . . . It is like a pathologic moral version of Hogarth's 'Rake's Progress.'"—Dr. Bremen, cited by Meta Lander in The Tobacco Problem (Boston: Lee and Shepard, 1882), p 166.

    Due to cigarettes' 90% role in crime, Judge Leroy B. Crane recommended, "Congress should stop the manufacture, sale, and importation of cigarettes."—Quoted by Prof. Bruce Fink, Tobacco (Cincinnati: Abingdon Press, 1915), p 19.
    As in 1892, Congress refused.

    Smoker deviance, propensity to lie including making false accusations, commit crime including domestic assault, is notorious, including in movies. For example, recall the smoker (a) assaulting his daughter, (b) arranging false accusation of rape, (c) menacing a widow, (d) attempted breaking and entering into a judge’s house, and (e) assaulting the neighbor's children in the movie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Scene 32, (1962) with Gregory Peck, based on the book (1960) by Harper Lee.
    Note also the movie, The Star Chamber (1983), with Michael Douglas, Hal Holbrook, Yaphet Kotto, etc., which emotionalized but carefully avoided citing causation, and had the star smoking throughout!! Avoiding causation/prevention information, is typical of "crime" movies and TV.
    And note also the crime-related movie A Clockwork Orange (1971) by smoker director Stanley Kubrick. He hallucinated a nonsense aversion approach to crime, carefully avoiding the 90% tobacco factor! Typical! of the censorship of this type data.

    In 1925, the French word "éclatement" (referring to a tire blow-out) is used graphically to describe the effect of nicotine (significant cellular level destruction) on the brain. That same year saw publication of data linking smoking and cancer.

    In 1884, Dr. Claude E. Bourdin, Le Tabac et les Prisonniers (Reims, France: P. Lajoye, 1884), p 8, summarized the tobacco role in criminal-making: "le tabac [is] l'herbe de la servitude (the herb of servitude)."

    Analysts also had already long noted that all three Presidential assassins
  • (John Wilkes Booth [FC # 9,899; FC # 16,423; 6 DC 306] accessory to tobacco farmer activity),

  • Charles Guiteau [10 F 161; 14 Am St Trials 1-158],

  • Leon Czolgosz [14 Am St Trials 159-231)
  • up to that time were smokers.

    That fact, unknown nowadays as education has deteriorated from the high 19th century level, is from the 19th century; three presidential assassinations in forty years did get people's attention!—and the common factor, smoking.

    The assassins had widely different political ideas, so it was evident that tobacco's bad effects impact people regardless of beliefs, and smokers kill up to the limits of their means, which vary by their societal role. Note the variations in political views among these tobacco-induced killers:
  • Adolf Hitler (Nazi)

  • Catherine de Medici (royalty)

  • P. S. Ferré (anti-royalist)

  • Joseph Stalin (Bolshevik)

  • Mao-Tse Tung (Communist).
  • Despite their varying beliefs, each killed in a method that would be called "serial killer murders" if committed by private citizens. Their killings were in larger numbers than common (smoker) criminals can, as per their governmental roles. Modern pro-tobacco politicians kill too, as per their aiding and abetting the tobacco pusher holocaust.

    See other smoker examples when "the only way" of prevention is rejected:
    *Herman Mudgett (1861-1896) (built a private gas chamber and crematorium in his 1880's hotel in downtown Chicago for the killing of hundreds of people) (Case at Com v Mudgett, 4 Dist 739 (30 Nov 1895) aff'd 174 Pa 211; 34 A 588 [4 March 1896] )
    *Jack the Ripper (London killer, 1880's)
    *Bonnie and Clyde Barrow (1930's robbers and killers)
    *The Lisenba Case, the smoker who murdered his wives, 1932-1935, using hammer blows, snake bite, drowning, to collect accidental death insurance policies, deaths seeming so accidental the police were convinced, but fortunately not the insurance company. (Case at Lisenba v People of State of California, 314 US 219; 62 S Ct 280; 86 L Ed 166 (8 Dec 1941) (Context))
    *Al Capone, Chicago smoker and crime boss (Tax conviction case at Capone v U.S., 56 F2d 927; 30 STC 885 (CA 7, 27 Feb 1932) cert den 286 US 553; 52 S Ct 503; 76 L Ed 1288 (2 May 1932))
    *The Sadistic Burning-by-Cigarette Case (Case at Commonwealth v Farrell, 322 Mass 606; 78 NE2d 697 (12 April 1948) )
    * Harry Strauss ("Pittsburgh Phil," killed about 500 people, 1930's)
    *William Heirens (killed four, 1946)
    *Howard Unruh (killed 13, Camden, New Jersey, 1949)
    *William Cook (an habitual criminal, Missouri, killed ten people 1950-1951)
    *Edward Gein (killed three women, Wisconsin, 1950's (details in book Deviant, by Prof Harold Schechter; and movie Ed Gein)
    *Charles Starkweather (killed eight, Nebraska, 1957-1958)
    *Houseboy Crooker murdered his paramour when she said she'd leave him. (Case at Crooker v California, 47 Cal 2d 348; 303 P2d 753 (1957) aff'd 357 US 433; 78 S Ct 1287; 2 L Ed 2d 1448 (30 June 1958) (Context))
    *In this brain-damaged smoker murder case, Robinson, a smoker with suicidal tendencies, shot himself in the head, killed his infant son and common-law wife, and was convicted and jailed. (Case at Pate v Robinson, 22 Ill 2d 162; 174 NE2d 820 (1961) cert den 368 US 995 (1962) rev 345 F2d 691 (CA 7) aff'd 383 US 375; 86 S Ct 836; 15 L Ed 2d 815 (7 March 1966) (Context))
    *Mr. Giles: In this rape case, the three defendants had accosted a girl on a date parked by woods, "demanded money and cigarettes," then raped the girl.

    GILES CASE AND APPEALS LIST
    Giles v Maryland, 229 Md 370, 183 A2d 359 (18 July 1962) app dism 372 US 767; 83 S Ct 1102; 10 L Ed 2d 137 (22 April 1963) (initial case)
    Giles v Maryland, 231 Md 387, 190 A2d 627 (6 May 1963) (denial of motion for new trial)
    Giles v Maryland, 239 Md 458, 212 A2d 101 (13 July 1965) vacated and remanded 386 US 66; 87 S Ct 793; 17 L Ed 2d 737 (20 Feb 1967) (post-conviction proceedings)

    *Robert Charles Browne (Colorado killer of 20 - 48, from 1970 - 1995, "A Life of Killing"; "Affidavit details Colo. killer's claims")

    *Mr. Innis: In this crime case, the smoker was involved in kidnapping, robbery, and murder. (Case at Rhode Island v Innis, 120 RI; 391 A2d 1158 rev'd 446 US 291; 100 S Ct 1682; 64 L Ed 2d 297 [12 May 1980])

    *John Wayne Gacy (Illinois killer, exploited contractor job to entice victims, killed 33)

    GACY CASE AND APPEALS LIST
    People v John Wayne Gacy, 103 Ill 2d 1; 82 Ill Dec 391; 468 NE2d 1171 (6 June 1984) cert den 470 US 1037; 105 S Ct 1410; 84 L Ed 2d 799 (4 March 1985) (initial case)
    People v John Wayne Gacy, 125 Ill 2d 117; 125 Ill Dec 770; 530 NE2d 1340 (5 Dec 1988) cert den 490 US 1085; 109 S Ct 2111; 104 L Ed 671 (22 May 1989) (post-conviction issues)
    Gacy v Welborn, 1992 WL 211018 aff'd 994 F2d 305 (CA 7, Ill, 12 April 1993) cert den 510 US 899; 114 S Ct 269; 126 L Ed 2d 220 (3 Oct 1993) (habeas corpus issues)

    *Jeffrey Dahmer (the Wisconsin cannibal, 1991—demanded and got a court order to be allowed to smoke in the smoke-free jail, or he'd refuse to tell where the bodies were!)
    *Adolf Hitler, Catherine de Medici, P. S. Ferré, Joseph Stalin, Mao-Tse Tung (who killed in their governmental roles)
    *Charles Manson, a life of crime ending in four murders (Cases at State v Manson, 61 Cal App 3d 102; 132 Cal Rptr 265 (1976) (Tate murders) and 71 Cal App 3d 1; 139 Cal Rptr 275 (1977) (Spahn murders))
    *The Giles Cigarette Assault Case. It involved bodily injury to a child caused by a lighted cigarette. (Case at State v Giles, 183 Neb 296; 159 NW2d 826 (21 June 1968))
    *Ferrandin (killed family, 1842)
    *Troppmann (killed family, 1800's)

    *Albert Fisher (killed women)

    *Lee Harvey Oswald (1963; "had a history of repeated episodes of uncontrolled impulsive assaultive behavior . . . in a number of street fights and tried to commit suicide"—classic smoker symptoms)

    *Ted Bundy (killed women) (Incidently, telling a putative authority, Dr. James Dobson, what he evidently wanted to hear, Bundy blamed pornography!! not his tobacco-induced brain damage!)

    BUNDY CASE AND APPEALS LIST
    Bundy v State of Florida, 471 So 2d 9 (9 May 1985) cert den 479 US 894; 107 S Ct 295; 93 L Ed 2d 269 (14 Oct 1986) (initial case)
    Bundy v Dugger, 816 F2d 564 (CA 11, 2 April 1987) cert den 484 US 870; 108 S Ct 198; 98 L Ed 2d 149 (5 Oct 1987) (habeas corpus case)
    488 US 1036; 109 S Ct 887; 102 L Ed 2d 1009 (23 Jan 1989) (issue of a stay)

    *Charles Whitman (Texas tower shooter, shot 41, killed 17, had brain cancer)
    *Lawrence Brewer (Texas dragging death case, 1998)
    *Richard Speck (had "symptoms of serious brain disease," killed 8 nurses, Chicago, July 1966). At People v Richard Speck, 41 Ill 2d 177; 242 NE2d 208 (22 Nov 1968) rev 403 US 946; 91 S Ct 2279; 29 L Ed 2d 855 (28 June 1971)

    *E. W. Hensley (age 17, killed 28 people, Texas, 1973)

    * Richard Allen Davis (lifelong criminal, who while on parole kidnapped and brutally murdered 11 year old Polly Klauss in 1993. While interrogated, Davis was smoking one cigarette after another. [Shown on TV program American Justice which mentioned that Davis has no conscience nor empathy for his victims--classic smoker symptoms.]

    *Larry Ashbrook (At Wedgwood Baptist Church, Texas, killed seven, then himself, September 1999)

    * Gary Ridgway, Seattle's Green River Killer (note profile item 24, the probable tobacco connection, known in law enforcement since the 1830's!)

    *John Muhammad (Maryland sniper, killed several, has smoker symptom pattern, October 2002)
    *Charles A. McCoy Jr. (smoker Ohio sniper late 2003-early 2004, a gambler, "history of mental illness" known to occur disproportionately among smokers)

    *Dennis Rader, the Kansas "BTK" killer of ten (has smoker symptom pattern including conscienceless and aphasia)

    *Steve Green, killer in the Haditha massacre, embarrassing US Army (photo, smoking, p 35, in Sarah Childress and Michael Hirsh, "An Itchy Trigger Finger," Newsweek pp 34-35 (7 August 2006)

    *Ronald Jayne, Jr., after causing a crash while rushing out to buy cigarettes, by his ignoring a stop sign, hitting oncoming traffic, killing five people and injuring others: “after Jayne caused the incident he got out, sat on the side of the road and said 'this is going to mean a world of hurt for me.' He lit up a cigarette and waited for the police.” *nbsp; “Yes [says commentary], poor Jayne is in a world of hurt. Sounds like he didn’t even care that he killed 5 people and injured 3 more. 4 of the dead were children” (Details; Subsequent Sentencing. (June 2007)

    *Steven Phillip Kazmierczak, tatooed Northern Illinois University shooter of five persons (February 2008)

    "Most of the domestic mass murders, assassinations, homicides, and assaults have individual psychopathological aspects which overshadow the general social themes. Seventy percent of homicides in America are not even crime-related, and extremely few are truly political," say Neil Burch and H. L. Altshuler, Behavior and Brain Electrical Activity (NY: Plenum Press, 1975), p 535.

    Murder "often results from quarrels combined with a lowering of inner reality and ethical restraints; for example, intoxicants [underlie] the motivational picture in about half of all homicide cases. . . . homicide may be involved with such [disproportionately smoker] mental disorders as schizophrenia and paranoia," says James C. Coleman, Ph.D., Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life, 5th ed (Scott, Foresman & Co, 1976), p 400.

    As stated above, "[m]aternal prenatal smoking predicts persistent criminal outcome in male offspring." See Brennan, et al., 56 Arch Gen Psychiatry 215-219 (March 1999).

    As this site shows, data linking smoking and crime is not new. However, politicians typically refuse to act on the data.

    Instead of prevention, what do politicians prefer? "The usual method employed to prevent crime is punishment," says Ronald A. Anderson and Walter A. Kempf, Business Law - Principles and Cases (Cincinnati: Smith-Western Pub Co, 1967), p 53. The fact that that approach does not work, indeed, is NOT prevention, but after-the fact, is brazenly disregarded.

    (Inherently, punishment is after-the-fact, so inherently cannot be deemed "prevention." When politicians and media label "punishment" as "prevention," be assured, their mislabeling in that way is malicious, intentional, sadistic, intending to harm you. How so? In law and fact, the "natural and probable consequence" of not doing genuine prevention is more crime, thus is intended.)

    Note the contrast between modern law and the example of the ancient world, "the Germanic tribes of the north" and "the two . . . Germanic tribes, the Angles and the Saxons, [who] settled in England." "By and large, imprisonment was not used as a punishment," say Phyllis Elperin Clark, M.A., and Robert Lehrman, M.F.A., Doing Time: A Look at Crime and Prisons (New York: Hastings House, 1980), p 24. Instead, restitution was made "to their victims," p 25.

    So, "we should ask how the idea of prison took root in our culture. . . . for most of Western history, the prison sentence was practically unknown," p 18.

    What changed? "When the Normans conquered England in 1066, two different forms of [so-called] justice met. The [power-mad] Norman kings were not 25used to the Anglo-Saxon idea of leaving justice in private hands, but they were quick to see the advantage of fines as a form of punishment. They made one change . . . instead of paying the fines [restitution] to their victims, offenders were now ordered to pay the money to the king," pp 24-25. "We do know that crime simply does not decrease as penalties get tougher," p 119.


    One “important factor [in the British monarchy having decided to begin defining crimes] was . . . to build up a strong central government. Acts [previously legal] became crimes.

    “As the king [government] became more powerful, legislation against private crime increased and after the Norman conquest [of England by William the Conqueror, 1066] a distinct body of criminal law evolved for the first time. . . ."

    “As part of his policy of strengthening the central government, Henry II (1154-89) established the system [leading to modern] judges.

    “[In the] reign of Henry VII [1485-1509] . . . a strong central government [did] emerge . . . reflected by a great increase in the types of crimes against which legislation was passed. . . .

    “Under the Stuarts [1603-1689; King James I, Charles I, Charles II, James II], the need to raise money for the crown led to [yet more] new crimes being defined.”—“Crime,” Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol 6, pp 754-758 (this quote, pp 756-757) (1963).


    One “device of Edward [IV] [1461-1483] for filling his exchequer was a very stringent [law] enforcement [policy]; small infractions of the laws being made the excuse for exorbitant fines. This was a trick which Henry VII. [1485-1509] was to turn to still greater effect.”—“English History,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., Vol 9, pp 466-587 (this quote, p 520) (1910).
    “Queen Elizabeth I preferred to use convicts as [forced labor]. By 1602 . . . Elizabeth appointed a commission to enlarge the list of crimes for which offenders could be sent [into forced labor for the government]”—Doing Time, supra, p 30.
    The bottom line is, many politicians and their accessories do NOT want to prevent crime. They have motives to assure that more and more crimes are committed.

    On all other subjects, everyone knows that after-the-fact action is not before-the-fact action. Shutting the barn door after the horse is stolen is not prevention of the horse being stolen!! "After-the-fact" is NOT "before-the-fact." Is this a hard one to understand? No, not for anyone, except a malicious politician or media-pundit, on the crime subject.

               Prevention, as our better educated turn-of-the century ancestors knew, means before-the-fact. Prevention means preventing the 90% factor from even beginning, from even being manufactured. We need to resume the wisdom of our ancestors, resume genuine prevention.


    The brain, including "the cingulum, the hippocampus, the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei, and the more complex masses of the basal ganglia, midbrain, and amygdala . . . has . . . functions including the modulation and control of . . . behavior . . . especially violent behavior . . . brain disease can disrupt [the brain's] ability to control behavior." And, "alterations in the structure . . . invariably produce changes in . . . behavior, with results ranging [up to] terrifying rage." See Vernon H. Mark, M.D., and Frank R. Ervin, M.D., Violence and the Brain (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), p 24.

    "The injury or destruction of critical parts of the brain . . . affects behavior in a most dramatic fashion. A tiny damage to the midbrain, for example, will put an end to all meaningful behavior by producing profound and permanent coma," p 140.

    Even a single "lesion in the brain is able to destroy even [otherwise permanent ability to obey] "rules governing behavior, " p 142. Wherefore "we physicians have almost all encountered as a symptom of disease, violent behavior. . . ," p viii. (This is another way of saying the 1924 observation that "[J]udges of juvenile courts everywhere recognize the close relationship that exists between cigarettes and crime," supra.)

    "The brain is unique among body organs in that it does not function exclusively within the confines of the body. . . . the brain operates outside the skull, confirming and interacting with . . . outside events . . . it has the capacity, after perceiving these events, to store them for future reference in its own tissue. This process, of course, is what we call memory, and it is an essential part of learning," p 140. Memory "is imbedded in our brain and its use is dependent on the function or malfunction of the cerebral tissue. Major parts of the memory circuit are in the same anatomical location as the limbic brain," p 141.

    An "aspect of 'memory' in the social sense is the ability to retain and follow cultural rules governing behavior. . . . A lesion in the brain is able to destroy [this process, thus degrade] behavior," p 142. "Basically, then, violent behavior is governed most closely by the structures of the limbic brain," p 16.

    "[S]tudies of patients with injuries known to involve chiefly the temporal lobe indicate that these patients tend to be inappropriately combative—that is, they show the effects of limbic dysfunction," p 57.

    Many criminals they analyzed "were not only impulsively violent, they had difficulty in restraining their impulses in all other areas of their lives too. [They were not] deterred by the knowledge or threat of punishment, because the [brain] mechanisms that keep most of us from immediately acting on our impulses were deficient or absent in them . . . unable to control their behavior, no matter what the circumstances. . . . It is impossible . . . to re-educate [counsel, rehabilitate] or to threaten such people into behaving rationally. They are too easily provoked . . . too unable to control their inappropriate reactions," p 147.

    "As doctors, we view individual violence as a medical as well as a social problem . . . many of the individuals who act violently have brain diseases . . . . [M]ore often than not . . . violence . . . is related to brain dysfunction," p 5.

    "Most people consider brain disease to be a rare phenomenon. It is likely, however, that more than ten million Americans [1970] suffer from an obvious brain disease. . . . We do not mean to say that all of these brain-diseased people are violent. What we are saying is that an appreciable percentage of the relatively few individuals guilty of repeated personal violence are to be found in this . . . population whose brains do not function in a perfectly normal way," p 5.

    "The classical example of a [damage] of the brain that produces changes in behavior is the virus encephatlitis that causes rabies—a disease whose very name, rage in French, rabia in Italian, and Wut in German—means madness or rage. The early symptoms of rabies may include mental aberrations . . . assault, alcoholism, and periods of violent rage. . . . In animals . . . a prominent symptom is the occurrence of an extremely vicious, and uncontrolled attack of rage, which is why the cry of 'mad dog' has always provoked such fear . . . the rabies virus . . . characteristically infects the limbic system of the brain," p 58.

    Violence results as brain damage affects "how the brain perceives, fails to perceive, or misperceives incoming stimuli. For instance, [such] a person . . . generally does not attack others without what he considers to be provocation. What happens is that the brain misperceives some incoming stimulus—a harmless gesture, or a joking remark, let us say—as extremely threatening or enraging, when it is in fact not so. If another driver cuts his car off at a stoplight, his brain interprets it as a deadly insult, and he reacts accordingly," pp 6-7. (Such inappropriate reaction to what is not in fact "provocation" constitutes "universal malice.")

    The misperception becomes so severe as to render smokers "dépossédés du sens humain . . . par une impulsion qu'on ne peut qualifier que de folie . . . désordre . . . comme les bêtes fauves . . . . dégradation narcotique les abaisse . . . rage . . . déchirent, ils mutilent sans nécessité, par instinct féroce."—Dr. Hippolyte A. Dépierris, Physiologie Sociale, supra, p 342.

    This effect of tobacco smoking was noted as long ago as 1845: "Tobacco prepares its victims for acts of barbarity . . . . We do not insinuate that all who use tobacco are cruel . . . . But tobacco frets and irritates the nerves, and after the system begins seriously to suffer from its use, it excites the passions, and things are seen with a false shape and coloring:

    "As in the night, imagining some fear,
    How easy is a bush supposed a bear."
    —Benjamin I. Lane, The Mysteries of Tobacco
    (New York: Wiley and Putnam, 1845), p 85.

    Smoker failure to correctly perceive reality can result from the reality-impairing hallucinogenic effect of tobacco.

    ". . . . a long literature exists on use of tobacco and its derivatives in [Indian] ceremonial trance induction, witchcraft, divination . . . . Native use of tobacco parallels that of other hallucinogenic substances . . . .
    "The amounts of harman and norharman in cigarette smoke are about 10-20 mcg. per cigarette. This is about 40 to 100 times greater than that found in the tobacco leaf, indicating that pyrosynthesis occurs in the leaves during the burning . . . .
    "harmine in relatively small doses crosses the blood-brain barrier and causes changes in the neural transmission in the visual system."—Oscar Janiger, M.D., and Marlene Dobkin De Rios, M.D., "Nicotiana an Hallucinogen?," 30 Econ Bot 149-151 (April-June 1976).

    Pre-Columbian Indians used tobacco for its hallucinogenic effect, says Jan G. R. Elferink, "The Narcotic and Hallucinogenic Use of Tobacco in Pre-Columbian Central America," 7 Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111-122 (1983). Conquistadores took note.

    Wherefore, "one of the known effects of tobacco is to cause forgetfulness , especially of higher things . . . . It is obvious that forgetfulness is a common result of smoking."—Herbert H. Tidswell, M.D., The Tobacco Habit: Its History and Pathology (London: J. & A. Churchill, 1912), p 37.

    Notwithstanding these facts, lawmakers and others corruptly and maliciously—so as to keep crime continuing—refuse to acknowledge this fact. They maliciously prefer "largely discredited" notions and write them "in our laws," Violence and the Brain, p 144. They maliciously disregard the fact that "violence is one of our major public health problems," p 4.

    As Violence and the Brain, p 142 shows, even one brain lesion can seriously deteriorate behavior.

    By 1907, there was "a full . . . knowledge of the effects of tobacco on the nervous system. . . . A variety of substances have been found in tobacco aside from nicotine. Some of these are pyridin, picolin, tulidin, parvolin, collodin, rubidin, varidin; also carbolic acid and marsh gas." The result is that tobacco "registers a permanent and definite impression in nervous structures when it is used for months or years." "Tobacco is a powerful depressant to the motor or efferent nerves, acting primarily upon their peripheral filaments. . . . The sympathetic ganglia are first stimulated and then depressed by nicotine. . . . In chronic poisoning there is more or less gastroenteritis of a hemorrhagic nature. Ecchymosis occurs in the pleura and peritioneum. Hyperemia of the lungs, brain and cord is found. . . . Coarse lesions have been found in the brain and spinal cord."—L. Pierce Clark, M.D., 71 Medical Record (#26) 1072-1073 (29 June 1907).

    Thomas A. Edison made a smilar point seven years later, 1914, about the role of acrolein in smokers' brain damage.

    In addition, smoking deprives the brain of sufficient oxygen. Maternal smoking doubles a child's risk of developing attention deficit disorder, as shown in the study by Sharon Milberger, Sc.D., Joseph Biederman, M.D., Stephen V. Faraone, Ph.D., et al., "Is maternal smoking during pregnancy a risk factor for attention hyperactivity disorder in children?" 153 American Journal of Psychiatry (#9) 1138-1142 (September 1996), details at our birth defects prevention website. Naturally, a person who can't pay attention, can't remember the laws, so can't obey them, thus again reaffirming the cigarette role in crime.

    Smokers' typical brain-damage symptoms include "distorted time perception," they "spoke about time moving slowly," thus displayed "marked denial of concern . . . about any dangers associated with tobacco."—Peter H. Knapp, M.D., et al, 119 Am J Psychiatry (#10) 966-972 (April 1963). Dangers, consequences, are future matters, time matters. Likewise in crime, smoker criminals typically do not visualize and comprehend time-related matters, e.g., future consequences: most basically, getting caught.

    By 1836, it was already well-established "that thousands and tens of thousands die of diseases of the lungs generally brought on by tobacco smoking. . . . How is it possible to be otherwise? Tobacco is a poison. A man will die of an infusion of tobacco as of a shot through the head."—Samuel Green, New England Almanack and Farmer's Friend (1836). A person who has been "shot through the head" . . . likely he'll have some brain damage impairing his actions, huh?! Yes, I think so? Wonder if any doctors noticed!? and wrote about this effect on smokers? and the role in crime?

    Examples of Harm From Mind-Altering Drugs
    "Drugs . . . increase aggression. . . . Radioactive labeling . . . reveals that it [a brain-impacting drug] exerts its influence within the limbic system, effectively shutting off the emotional parts of the brain from the influence of the overarching cortex. Insight, judgment, and reasoning are impaired. Reponsibility and intention melt away, leaving the individual at the mercy of his now unleashed aggressive impulses. Episodes of sudden unprovoked violence . . . have become common."—Richard M. Restak, M.D., The Mind (New York, Bantam Books, 1988), p 283.

    In fact "as a rule [people] are not going to commit murder unless . . . head injury [brain damage] significant neurological impairments are . . . present. . . . brain damage, the major cause of such impairments, is very common in persons who have been examined by a neurologist because of their violent behavior or acts. The damage is confirmed by abnmormal EEG readings and PET scans." Restak, supra, p 282.

    There is "clear evidence that control, responsibility, and intention can be altered by abnormal electrical discharges within the brain. . . ." Restak, supra, p 282.

    "Violence [due to] mental illness may involve hallucinations, delusions . . . violence can also be cold, casual, callous . . . . 'They have little or no conscience or sense of guilt, tend to project blame when they get into trouble. They are unreliable, untruthful . . . but they are often convincing because they believe their own lies. There is a vast gult between what they say and what they do. They are impulsive, the whim of the moment being paramount. They are given to periodic and often senseless antisocial behavior which may be either aggressive or passive and parasitic.'" "'They lie and steal, seemingly with total disregard for the consequences.'" Restak, supra, p 310, quoting neuropsychiatrist Frank Elliott.

    Centuries of evidence shows "that our [human] rationality is dependent on the normal functioning of tissue within our skulls. . . . in the presence of a barely measurable electrical impulse within the nlimbic system, our much vaunted rationality can be replaced by savage attacks and seemingly inexplicable violence. What's more, the violent mind is violent only sporadically and explosively." "Moments later [the person is] contrite and puzzled. 'What happened?' . . . 'Why did I do that?'" Restak, supra, pp 280-282.

    “In a study of 300 [criminals], MacDonald (1959) found not only a high incidence of psychopathic personalities and chronic alcoholics, but also a . . . number of schizophrenics, manics, seniles, and mentally retarded individuals. In general, the most common forms of psychopathy associated with serious crimes appear to be antisocial personality, alcoholism, and drug dependence; however, there is also a disproportionately high number of borderline and actual psychotics (Guze, Goodwin, & Crane, 1969; Sutker & Moan, 1973).”—James C. Coleman, Ph.D., Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life, 5th ed (Scott, Foresman & Co, 1976), p 399.

    There certainly has been plenty of analysis of the role of drugs and crime. See for example, the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, website entitled “Statistics on Drugs and Crime.” See also its
  • 30 June 2006 Report showing "2,245,189 prisoners were held in Federal or State prisons or in local jails"

  • Wednesday, 29 November 2006, report showing that a record seven million people — or one in every 32 American adults — were behind bars, on probation, or on parole at the end of last year. Of those, an astounding 2.2 million people were actually in prison or jail, an increase of 2.7% over 2005. From 1995 to 2003, inmates in federal prison for drug offenses have accounted for 49% of the growth in the total federal prison population.
  • So naturally, in view of the long known tobacco-drrug connection, there has been much analysis, and far longer, of the role of the gateway drug and crime.

    Example of Crime Rates Per 100,000
    With Smokers Committing 90% of 100 Crimes
    POPULATIONCRIMESRATIO
    Nonsmokers
    71,000
    10 
    1:7100
    Smokers
    29,000
    90
    1:322
    Total
    100,000
    100
    1:1000

    Everyone A Nonsmoker: 86% Crime Reduction
    POPULATIONCRIMESRATIO
    Nonsmokers
    71,000
    10 
    1:7100
    New Nonsmokers
    29,000
    4
    1:7250
    Total
    100,000
    14
    1:7143

    Results of Having A Mere 14
    Crimes When There Had Been 100
  • Massive layoffs of prosecutors, police officers, prison guards, prison administrators, judges, court staff, prison builders, "treatment-," "empathy-enhancement-," and "rehabilitation-" counselors, defense attorneys, etc., etc.
  • And: tax reductions for taxpayers, local, state and federal-wide.
  • And: prevention of DWB incidents.
    Suggestion:
  • Ask your jurisdiction officials to tell you the police-population ratio.
    (That of the U.S. in 2004 is 870,000 officers for
    294,000,000 people: 87:29400, a 1:338 ratio.)
  • Calculate the ratio with an 80% reduction.
  • Write the new, lower, police-population ratio into the jurisdiction's constitution or charter. The purpose is to prevent easy 'new hiring.'
  • Include a proviso specifying that crime prevention via tobacco control is mandatory. Forbid the 'crime fighting' focus.
    Easy hiring (along with disregarding 'crime prevention' in order to, instead, do so-called 'crime fighting') was a factor leading to the current excess of officers.
    All in the system know this. However, in agencies, it is management policy that "every action or decision . . . must be intended to keep the institutional machinery working," says David W. Ewing, "Canning Directions: How the Government Rids Itself of Troublemakers," Harpers 16, 18, 22 (August 1979).
    For example, in the FBI, a supervisor who found an employee working too diligently, fired her, to keep budgets and staffing high! Too bad about Americans who might be endangered, or killed!
    Re officers who want to "blow the whistle," want to actually proactively prevent crime via the long-established data of which you seeing an overview here, they can easily foresee being fired, because whistle blower protection laws are worthless to actually protect employees.
    The subject of worthlessness of employee-protection laws has been cited by many analysts including but not limited to Thomas M. Devine and Donald G. Aplin, "Whistleblower Protection—Gap Between Law and Reality," 31 Howard Law J (#2) 223 (1988).
  •            As the subject of crime (including brain damage, with symptoms of abulia aka psychopathy or anomie, leading to crime) is a "major public health problem" (a euphemism for smoking), many studies have been done on the subject. Many studies.

    There have been many studies, progressing in accuracy from the initial hesitancies to the now quite confidently reported findings. You already have read (above) the medical research technique developed over a long period, let's say, to keep it short, since 1537, and re-confirmed successfully through 1795. Let's continue now, this time focusing on crime-related studies, in the last 250 years. Here is a partial list of pertinent analyses, references, observations, studies, and commentaries 1751 to present:

    Bibliography of Crime Studies and Books
    by Physicians and Others (1751-2008)
    Fielding, Henry, An Enquiry into the Causes of the Late Increase of Robbers, &c. (London: A. Millar, 1751) von Haller, Albrecht, Elementa Physiologiae: Elements of Physiology (Lausannae, 1757) (cited brain importance in pyschic functions; advocated post-mortem brain examinations)
    Beccaria, Cesare, Crime and Punishments (1764) (established the science of criminology, advocated deterrence) John Howard, LL.D., F.R.S. (1726-1790), The State of the Prisons in England and Wales,With Preliminary Observations and an Account of Some Foreign Prisons and Hospitals (Warrington, W. Eyres, 1777; repr. Abingdon, Oxon.: Professional Books, 1977)
    Rush, Benjamin, M.D. (1746-1813), Two Essays on The Mind: An Enquiry into the Influence of Physical Causes upon the Moral Faculty, and On the Influence of Physical Causes in Promoting an Increase of the Strength and Activity of the Intellectual Faculties of Man (New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1786 reprinted 1972) Rush, Benjamin, M.D., A Plan for the Punishment of Crime: Two Essays (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Prison Society, 1787 reprinted 1991)
    Alcott, Wm. A., M.D., The Use of Tobacco (New York: Fowler and Wells, 1836), p 19 Ray, Isaac, A Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity (London: G. Henderson Pub, 1839)
    Griesinger, Wilhelm, Die Pathologie und Therapie der Psychischen Krankheiten: Pathology and Therapy of Psychic Disorders (Stuttgart: Krabbe, 1845) (explained all mental disorders in brain pathology terms) Quetelet, Adolphe Jacques, Sur la Statistique Morale et Les Principes Qui Doivent en Former la Base [On Moral Statistics and the Principles Which Must Form The Basis] (Belgium, 1848)
    Harlow JM, "Passage of an Iron Rod Through The Head," 39 Boston Med and Surg J (#20) 389-393 (13 Dec 1848) [like the above-cited "shot through the head" cited by Green, supra] Bigelow HJ, "Dr. Harlow's Case of Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Rod Through The Head," 19 Am J Med Sci 13-22 (1850) [He didn't.]
    Howison, Robert Reid, Reports of Criminal Trials (Richmond: Geo. M. West & Bro, 1851) (published "in hope of learning the origin and cure of crime") Auburn, NY, State Prison Observations (1854)
    Broca P, "Sur la faculté du langage acticulé," 6 Bull Soc Anthropol, Paris 337-393 (1865) Harlow JM, "Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Rod Through The Head," 2 Pub Mass Med Soc 327-347 (1868) [Confirming no recovery.]
    Wernicke C, Der Aphasische Symptomencomplex (Breslau: Cohn und Weigert, 1874) Depierris, H A. "Le Tabac Pousse Au Crime," pp 326-344 of Physiologie Sociale: Le Tabac (Paris: Dentu, 1876)
    Ferrier David, MD, FRS, FRCP, "The Goulstonian Lectures on the Localisation of Cerebral Disease," 1 Brit Med J 399-447 (23 March 1878) Sizer N, Forty Years in Phrenology: Embracing Recollections of History, Anecdote and Experience (New York: Fowler and Wells, 1882)
    Kraepelin, Emil, Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie (1883) (cited brain pathology in mental disorders, citing symptom patterns, developing systematic classification) Bourdin, Claude E., Le Tabac et les Prisonniers (Reims, France: P. Lajoye, 1884)
    Fleury, Maurice de, L'âme du Criminel (Paris: F. Alcan, 1898) Ellis, Henry Havelock (1859-1939), The Criminal, 3rd ed (London: Walter Scott Pub, 1901) [Quoted]
    Ferri, Enrico, Lecture (Univ of Naples, 24 April 1901) Charles Goring, MD, The English Convict: A Statistical Study (Darling and Son, Ltd, for H.M. Stationery Office, 1913) (details)
    Healy, William, The Individual Delinquent: A Text-book of Diagnosis and Prognosis for All Concerned in Understanding Offenders (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1920) Healy, William, Mental Conflicts and Misconduct (Boston: Little, Brown, 1920)
    Healy, William, and Augusta F. Bronner, Delinquents and Criminals: Their Making and Unmaking: Studies in Two American Cities (New York, Macmillan Co, 1926) Healy, William, and Augusta F. Bronner, The Structure and Meaning of Psychoanalysis as Related to Personality and Behavior (New York: A.A. Knopf, 1930)
    McDougall, William, "Of the Words Character and Personality," 1 Character and Personality 3-16 (1932) Thurstone LL, "The Vectors of Mind," 41 Psychol Rev (#1) 1-32 (Jan 1934)
    Alpers BJ, "Relation of the Hypothalamus to Disorders of Personality: Report of A Case," 38 Arch Neur Psych 291 (1937) Cleckley H, The Mask of Sanity (St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1941)
    Brill NQ, Seidemann H, Montague H, Balser B, "Electroencephalographic Studies in Delinquent Behavior Problem Children," 98 Am J Psychiatry (#4) 494-498 (Jan 1942) Brown WT, Solomon CI, "Delinquency and the Electroencephalograph," 98 Am J Psychiatry (#4) 499-503 (Jan 1942)
    Hill D, Watterson D, "Electroencephalograph Studies of Psychopathic Personalities," 5 J Neurol Psych 47 (1942) Gehman, JM, "Tobacco and Juvenile Delinquency," pp 217-241 of Smoke over America (NY: Roycrofters, 1943)
    Curran D and Mallinson P, "Psychopathic Personality," 90 J Mental Science 266-286 (1944) Hill D, "Cerebral Dysrhythmia: Its Significance in Aggressive Behavior," 37 Proc R Soc Med 317 (1944)
    Kennedy, Foster; Hoffman, Harry R.; and Haines, William H., "Psychiatric Study of William Heirens," 38 J Crim Law and Criminology (#3) 311-341 (1947-8)

    Stafford-Clark D, Taylor FH, "Clinical and Electroencephalograph Studies of Prisoners Charged With Murder," 12 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 325 (1949)

    Morris, Norval, LL.M., Ph.D., The Habitual Criminal (New York: Longmans, Green & Co, 1951) Hill D, Pond DA, "Reflections on One Hundred Capital Cases Submitted to Electroencephalo-graphy," 98 J Ment Sci 23-43 (Jan 1952)
    Alexander, Franz G., and Hugo Staub, The Criminal, the Judge, and the Public: A Psychological Analysis, 2d ed (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956) J. M. MacDonald, "A Psychiatric Study of Check Offenders," 116 Amer J. Psychiat. 438-442 (November 1959)
    Karpman, Ben, MD, "The Structure of Neurosis," 4 Arch Criminal Psychodynamics 599-647 (Fall 1961) Parker, Tony, and Robert Allerton, The Courage of His Convictions (New York: Norton, 1962)
    Guze SB, Tuason VB, Gatfield PD et al., "Psychiatric Illness and Crime With Particular Reference to Alcoholism," 134 J Nerv Ment Dis 512-521 (1962) McCord W, McCord J, The Psychopath: An Essay on the Criminal Mind (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1964)
    Malamud N, "Psychiatric Disorder with Intracranial Tumors of Limbic System," 17 Arch Neurol 113 (1967) Brown B, "Some Characteristic EEG Differences Between Heavy Smoker and Non-Smoker Subjects," 6 Neuropsychologia (#4) 381-388 (Dec 1968)
    Guze SB, Goodwin DW, Crane, JB, "Criminality and Psychiatric Disorders," 20 Arch Gen Psychiat 583-591 (May 1969) Williams, Denis, "Neural Factors Related to Habitual Aggression," 92 Brain 503-520 (1969)
    Reeves AG, Plum F, "Hyperphagia, Rage and Dementia Accompanying A Ventromedial Hypothalamic Neoplasm," 20 Arch Neurol 616 (1969) Ounstead C, "Aggression and Epilepsy: Rage in Children With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy," 13 J Psychosom Res 237 (1969)
    Sayed ZA, Lewis SA, Britain RP, "An Electroencephalograph and Psychiatric Study of 32 Insane Murderers," 27 Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 335 (1969) Parker, Tony, The Frying-Pan: A Prison and its Prisoners (New York: Basic Books, 1970)
    Killefer, Fred A, and W. Eugene Stern, MD, "Chronic Effects of Hypothalamic Injury: Report of a Case of Near Total Hypothalamic Destruction Resulting from Removal of a Craniopharyngioma," 22 Arch Neurol 419-429 (May 1970) Currie S, Heathfield KWG, Henson RA, Scott DF, "Clinical Course and Prognosis of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy," 95 Brain 173 (1971)
    Falconer MA, "Reversibility by Temporal Lobe Resection of the Behavior Abnormalities of Temoral Lobe Epilepsy," 289 N Engl J Med 451 (1973) Rodin, Ernst A, "Psychomotor Epilepsy and Aggressive Behavior," 28 Arch Gen Psych 210-213 (Feb 1973)
    Zimring, Franklin E., Gordon J. Hawkins, Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control (Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press, 1973) P. B. Sutker & C. E. Moan, "A Psychosocial Description of Penitentiary Inmates," 29 Arch. Gen. Psychiat. (#5) 663-667 (Nov 1973)
    Fingarette, Herbert, "Addiction and Criminal Responsibility," 84 Yale Law J 413 (1975) Fingarette, Herbert, and Anne F. Hasse, Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibil-ity (Berkeley: U of Cal Press, 1979) (Example)
    Lehrman, Robert, and Phyllis E. Clark, Doing Time: A Look at Crime and Prisons (Hastings House, Jan 1980) (Excerpt) Esling PJ, Damasio AR, "Severe Disturbance of Higher Cognation After Bilateral Frontal Lobe Ablation: Patient EVR," 35 Neurology 1731-1741 (Dec 1985)
    DiFranza, J. R., and M. P. Guerrera, "Alcoholism and Smoking," 51 J Studies Alcohol (#2) 130-135 (1990), p 134 Lynam, Donald R., T. E. Moffitt, and M.A. Stouthamer-Loeber, "Explaining the Relation Between IQ and Delinquency: Class, Race, Test Motivation, School Achievement, or Self-Control? 102 J Abnormal Psy (#2) 187-196 (May 1993)
    Moffitt, Terrie E; Donald R. Lynam; and Phil A. Silva, "Neuropsychological Tests Predicting Persistent Male Delinquency," 32 Criminology (#2) 277-300 (May 1994) Parker, Tony, The Violence of our Lives: Interviews with American Murderers (New York: H. Holt, 1995)
    Martell DA, "Causal Relation Between Brain Damage and Homicide: The Prosecution," 1 Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry (#3) 184-194 (July 1996) Raine A, Brennan P, Mednick B, Mednick SA, "High Rates of Violence, Crime, Academic Problems, and Behavioral Problems in Males With Both Early Neuromotor Deficits and Unstable Family Environments," 53 Arch Gen Psych 544-549 (1 June 1996)
    Eronen M, Hakola P, Tiihonen J, "Mental Disorders and Homicidal Behavior in Finland," 53 Arch Gen Psych 497-501 (1 June 1996) Teplin LA, Abram KM, McClelland GM, "Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among Incarcerated Women: I. Pretrial Jail Detainees," 53 Arch Gen Psych 505-512 (1 June 1996)
    Jordan BK, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA, Caddell JM, "Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among Incarcerated Women : II. Convicted Felons Entering Prison," 53 Arch Gen Psych 513-519 (1 June 1996) Virkkunen M, Eggert M, Rawlings R, Linnoila M, "Prospective follow-up study of alcoholic violent offenders and fire setters," 53 Arch Gen Psych 523-529 (1 June 1996)
    Hodgins S, Mednick SA, Brennan PA, Schulsinger F, Engberg M, "Mental Disorder and Crime: Evidence From a Danish Birth Cohort," 53 Arch Gen Psych 489-496 (1 June 1996) Fergusson DM, Lynskey MT, Horwood LJ, "Comorbidity Between Depressive Disorders and Nicotine Dependence in a Cohort of 16-Year-Olds," 53 Arch Gen Psych 1043-1047 (1 Nov 1996)
    Lynam, Donald R, "The Early Identification of Chronic Offenders: Who Is The Fledgling Psychopath?" 120 Psychol Bull (#2) 209-234 (1996) Lynam DR, "Pursuing the Psychopath: Capturing the Fledgling Psychopath in a Nomological Net," 106 J Abnormal Psy (#3) 425-438 (1997)
    Sarazin M, Pillon B, Giannakopoulos P, Rancurel G, Samson Y, Dubois B, "Clinicometabolic Dissociation of Cognitive Functions and Social Behavior in Frontal Lobe Lesions," 51 Neurology 142-148 (July 1998) Lynam DR, "Early Identification of The Fledgling Psychopath: Locating the Psychopathic Child in The Current Nomenclature," 107 J Abnormal Psy (#4) 566-575 (Nov 1998)
    Widiger TA, Lynam DR, "Psychopathy and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." In T Millon (Ed), Psychopathy: Antisocial, Criminal, and Violent Behaviors (pp 171-187) (New York: Guilford, 1998) Cohen L, Angladette L, Benoit N, Pierrot-Deseilligny C, "A Man Who Borrowed Cars," 353 Lancet (#9146) 34 (2 Jan 1999). (For access, register at www.thelancet.com)
    Brennan, PA, et al, "Relationship of Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy With Criminal Arrest and Hospitalization for Substance Abuse in Male and Female Adult Offspring," 159 Am J Psychiatry (#1) 48-54 (Jan 2002)
    Williams, K, "The Demand for Order and the Birth of Modern Policing" 55 Monthly Review (#7) (December 2003)
    Michael Gossop, Katia Trakada, Duncan Stewart and John Witton, "Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up" (79 Drug and Alcohol Dependence (# 3) 295-302 (1 Sep 2005) Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., "Criminals With Badges" (2 January 2008)
    National Library of Medicine
     

    Here are some quotes from the above analyses:
    "The observed reductions in crime among drug misusers after treatment represent substantial changes in behaviour and have considerable personal, social and clinical significance. Reduced criminality also provides substantial economic benefits to society," say Michael Gossop, et al, supra.

    Fergusson, et al., said, "Comorbidities between depression and nicotine dependence seem to be well established by the age of 16 years. Much of this comorbidity can be explained by common or correlated risk factors associated with depression or nicotine dependence," in Comorbidity between depressive disorders and nicotine dependence in a cohort of 16-year-olds," supra.

    The link between smoking, depression, and crime was noted over two centuries ago. The Surgeon General under George Washington was Dr. Benjamin Rush. Rush, who had signed the Declaration of Independence, opposed "the habitual use of tobacco, which he thought led to a desire for strong drink and was injurious both to health and morals."—Dr. Carl Binger, Revolutionary Doctor: Benjamin Rush (1746-1813) (1966), p 201. "Rush read the work of Sir Alexander Crichton . . . an expert in mental illness . . .Crichton's works . . . today they seem remarkable in view of the fact that they were published in 1798. For example, he said that murder was not uncommonly committed from despair and hid the wish for suicide," p 258.

    Teplin, et al., found "substantial psychiatric morbidity among female jail detainees." "Over 80% of the sample met criteria for one or more lifetime psychiatric disorders; 70% were symptomatic within 6 months of the interview. The most common disorders were [linked to smoking, the gateway drug, as they involved post-gateway] "drug abuse or dependence, alcohol abuse or dependence, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Major depressive episode was the most prevalent major mental disorder. Rates were generally highest among non-Hispanic whites and among older detainees. Rates for all disorders were significantly higher than general population rates, except for schizophrenia. Most detainees with psychiatric disorders were arrested for nonviolent crimes" in "Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women: I. pretrial jail detainees," supra.

    Eronen, et al., say, "Owing to the fact that Finnish police have been able to solve about 95% o